MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894154990 · doi:10.5284/1109272

A Programme of Archaeological Mitigation at Land at Foxley Wood, Buxton Road, Spixworth

2023· article· en· W6894154990 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrenchExcavationFencingGeoarchaeologySection (typography)Feature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the trial trenching was to record any archaeological evidence revealed to evaluate the development area for potential sub-surface archaeological features. Three 1.8m wide trenches were excavated under archaeological control using a 3-ton 3600 machine fitted with a ditching bucket. Spoil, exposed surfaces and features were scanned with a metal detector (Minelab XTerra 705). All metal-detected and hand-collected finds were retained for inspection, other than those which were obviously modern. All archaeological features and deposits were recorded using Norvic Archaeology pro forma sheets. The trench location, plans and sections were recorded at appropriate scales and digital images were taken of all relevant features and deposits. The results of an archaeological evaluation by trial trenching of land of land at Foxley Wood, Buxton Road, Spixworth. At the time of works the grassed field area (c.3400m2) was proposed for the development of x4 residential houses with garages. The proposed development site is located immediately adjacent to the route of a possible section of Roman road which runs from Brampton to Thorpe St Andrew. The feature is visible on aerial photographs as a series of linear bank features, showing up as cropmarks. In addition, recent archaeological investigation immediately to the south identified post-medieval activity of uncertain nature which includes man-made ponds, a flint lined well, a trackway and field boundaries. Only three features were identified, in the form of three shallow posthole bases of post-medieval date, all within Trench 3. The function of any posts here is likely to relate to post-medieval stock management of temporary fencing on land that was historically rather wet and clay heavy for pre-industrial ploughing. Only a small number of 18th to 20th century residual finds were recovered from the subsoil and ploughsoil. The discovery of a clay natural here in the form of a dense 'brickearth', primarily at the eastern end of the development plot, is worthy of note in relation to a concentration of post-medieval activity previously identified to the southwest through excavation in 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207