First Nations Council of Elders and Leaders (FNCEL): Pilot project report 2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As a multiplex organisation with diverse ambitions, aspirations and purposes, CQUniversity provides for the collective education and research needs of staff and students and meets the demands of engagement with external industry, government and community stakeholders. Inherent to these obligations is an associated and contemporary expectation of culturally diverse inclusion in all University activities. The CQUniversity’s Strategic Plan Central Queensland University (2019) includes a commitment to increased employment and education opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Pathways to achieving this aspiration are outlined by the Indigenous Leadership and Engagement Strategy (2019-2021) and supported by Universities Australia Indigenous Strategies (2017-2022 & 2022-2025). These documents proport that to meet current cultural expectation, the organisation included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture and knowledge in the University’s various landscapes: governance, research, education and engagement. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with the purpose of obtaining strategic and culturally appropriate advice to support and guide policy, procedure and research, requires a mechanism and formal process. Commonly specialist committees guide university governance. The First Nations Council of Elders and Leaders (FNCEL) was established as a special committee under the governance structure of the University and was initially trialed as a pilot research project. This first iteration of the FNCEL was inaugurated under a Terms of Reference and functioned as a special committee made up of nine First Nations community-based members who sat for six consecutive formal monthly meetings. To evaluate the efficacy and veracity of the chosen model, two new policies were created with input from the members of the FNCEL: The Confirmation of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander /First Nations Identity Protocol and Engaging and Communicating with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander/First Nation People Protocol, over the six-month trial. The pilot trial was conducted to explore the most beneficial paradigm of practice for the advisory group’s function. It also served as a first iteration of what is intended to become an established body for advising the University on the inclusion of First Nations culture and knowledge into the governance and management of the University. Primary data for the project was suppled and collated through interviews held with each of the nine members post meeting. Interviews led by the researcher were based on a series of questions, conducted online and recorded, with transcripts of the resultant recordings forming evidence for analysis. After examining, analysing and transforming data into overarching themes, and outlining the methodology and outcomes of testing the FNCEL model, the pilot project was deemed a successful foundation for a future iteration of the Council. FNCEL members felt their participation in the process and their cultural insight and contribution was valued and respected. They also expressed that their representative responsibilities on behalf of and in service to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students, staff and stakeholder communities was fulfilled by the creation of two new policies for the University. The new policies created by the pilot project iteration of the FNCEL have been approved by the University Management Committee and have been adopted into the suite of policies that support the governance of CQUniversity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,028 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».