Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with HIV: target trial and modelling study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and benefit-harm balance of various statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with HIV. DESIGN Target trial and modelling study. SETTING North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD), 1995 to 2019. NA-ACCORD integrates individual level data from >20 HIV cohorts across the US and Canada from people with HIV who have successfully linked into care. PARTICIPANTS 157 699 people with HIV enrolled in one of the cohorts of NA-ACCORD. 54 165 eligible individuals, aged 40-75 years, were enrolled in the target trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes for the target trial were the 10 year effects of statins on cardiovascular disease events (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospital admission for unstable angina, coronary or arterial revascularisation, fatal and non-fatal stroke, or transient ischaemic attack) and harm outcomes (type 2 diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, rhabdomyolysis, and myopathy). The secondary outcome was the 10 year risk threshold where the reduction in cardiovascular disease outweighed the increased risk of harm outcomes, showing an overall net benefit of statins. RESULTS Participants who first started receiving treatment with statins (statin initiators) had a 21% reduction in cardiovascular disease events (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.87) and a 26% reduction in the combined risk of stroke and myocardial infarction (0.74, 0.56 to 0.98), but a 12% increase in the risk of type 2 diabetes (1.12, 1.01 to 1.25) compared with participants who developed the indication but did not take statins (non-initiators). The effects on cognitive impairment (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.56), myopathy (1.10, 0.76 to 1.61), and rhabdomyolysis (1.09, 0.68 to 1.75) were not statistically significant. On average, the benefit of statins exceeded harms for individuals with a 10 year baseline risk of cardiovascular disease of ≥13.8%. Subgroup specific thresholds included men (14.2%), women (11.1%), ages 40-64 years (13.8%) versus 65-75 years (15.1%), and CD4 count >200 cells/mm³ (13.6%) versus <200 cells/mm³ (15.3%). Varying weights for cardiovascular disease yielded thresholds ranging from 11.6% to 54.0%, whereas weights for harm outcomes resulted in thresholds ranging from 5.0% to >30.0%. CONCLUSIONS In this study, statins benefitted individuals with HIV with a moderate or high risk of cardiovascular disease, but the threshold for net benefit varied by patient subgroup and preference, implying the need to customise statin treatment to individual risks, preferences, and treatment goals. Given the limitations of observational data, further controlled studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of statins in people with HIV receiving modern antiretroviral therapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».