MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911566677 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12371152

Moca test arabic pdf

2024· other· en· W6911566677 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCronbach's alphaArabicCognitionTest (biology)Reliability (semiconductor)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Moca test arabic pdfRating: 4.6 / 5 (2781 votes)Downloads: 34423>>>CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD<<< • the moca may be a suitable screening tool for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. moca test arabic pdf we validated moroccan moca according to the beaton et al. pdf | on, noumidia khatib and others published the moroccan moca test: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation | find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. 4% for detecting major ncd ( dementia). adapted versions were identified through a systematic review in 3 databases and on the moca website. the arabic version of the moca test was used in this study ( montreal cognitive assessment, ). results: the sensitivity, specificity, and alpha cronbach of the moca test were 88. aim: mild cognitive impairment ( mci) is a clinical label which includes elderly subjects with memory impairment and with no significant daily functional. 5 points, and correlation between the two evaluations was high ( correlation coefficient = 0. objectives: to assess cognitive performance in saudi patients on dialysis using arabic versions of the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) and assess the reliability of the scales. the cognitive assessment included a brief screening of global cognitive function, using the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) ( english, arabic and hebrew versions were used, according to the. the subject must tap moca test arabic pdf with his hand at each letter a. do 2 trials, even if 1st trial is successful. • in lebanon, the moca arabic version is not commonly used in psychiatric illness. the only validated, widely‐ used dementia screen that has arabic language norms/ cutoffs is the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca). the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) was developed as a brief screening instrument to detect mild. yet, arabic translations of the moca vary across countries. tamazight), and arabic. 79 for the mms test. the recommended cut- off was 21/ 22 with sensitivity of 92. the later version was validated and its reliability was tested ( abdulrahman and algaafary, ). ( 1) it is a paper- and- pencil tool that requires approximately 10 minutes to administer, and is. results: test– retest reliability data of the arabic moca were collected approximately 35. calculations, and orientation. this study provides a systematic review of linguistically and culturally adapted versions of the original montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) full version. 7% and specificity of 97. the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) is used to assesses cognitive impairment. moca test arabic version was pdf used for grading the cognitive state and to estimate the stage, and deterioration of cognitive impairment ( nasreddine et al. this study assesses the reliability and validity of montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) arabic version in mci detection and determines the prevalence of mci among apparently healthy elderly people attending geriatric clubs in cairo. moca) ∫ éjîfƒe ' ™ ñàÿg ' ô© ÿg º« « ≤ àdg á« hô© dg ᨠ∏ déh: º° s' g: io' ƒdg ïhqéj : á° sgq~ dg iƒà° ùe : ïjqéàdg : ¢ ùæ÷ g. • the moca demonstrated adequate validity as a cognitive screening tool. authors have no conflict of interests, and the. scored out of 30 points. 2% for detecting mild ncd and 16/ 17 with sensitivity of 90. concept and clinical review. 18, 25 these tests are available in arabic from the moca website, and permission to use the tests in research, with pdf minor modification27 to follow the local arabic accent, disclosure. the internal consistency of the arabic. 87, while they were 90. overall, 86 culturally different versions of moca are available: 74 versions on the moca website ( 25 of them have a corresponding paper. read list of digits ( 1 digit/ sec. scribd is the world s largest social reading and publishing site. the mean change in arabic moca scores from the first to second evaluation was 0. subject has to repeat them in the forward order. conclusion: the moroccan moca test had high sensitivity, specificity, and internal reliability compared to the mms. other moca versions are available for different patient. do a recall after 5 minutes. conclusion: the arabic moca- b is a valid cognitive assessment tool in elderly egyptian subjects. using the arabic version of the standard moca ) moca- a( and the arabic basic version ) moca- b(. cognitive impairment. the moca may be administered by anyone who understands and follows the instructions, however, only a health professional with expertise in the cognitive field may interpret the results. moca full is widely used internationally by various medical professionals and available in over 100 languages and dialects. read list of letters. the original moca in paper format ( " moca full" ) is the most sensitive and validated cognitive screening tool, supported by over 500 peer- reviewed studies. 5% and specificity of 98. time to administer the moca is approximately 10 minutes. the first edition of our guidelines for culturally adapting the montreal cognitive assessment, developed in our research " developing guidelines for the translation and cultural adaptation of the.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,708
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,416

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,7080,587

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Travaux en français237 207→