MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911566677 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12371152

Moca test arabic pdf

2024· other· en· W6911566677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCronbach's alphaArabicCognitionTest (biology)Reliability (semiconductor)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moca test arabic pdfRating: 4.6 / 5 (2781 votes)Downloads: 34423>>>CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD<<< • the moca may be a suitable screening tool for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. moca test arabic pdf we validated moroccan moca according to the beaton et al. pdf | on, noumidia khatib and others published the moroccan moca test: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation | find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. 4% for detecting major ncd ( dementia). adapted versions were identified through a systematic review in 3 databases and on the moca website. the arabic version of the moca test was used in this study ( montreal cognitive assessment, ). results: the sensitivity, specificity, and alpha cronbach of the moca test were 88. aim: mild cognitive impairment ( mci) is a clinical label which includes elderly subjects with memory impairment and with no significant daily functional. 5 points, and correlation between the two evaluations was high ( correlation coefficient = 0. objectives: to assess cognitive performance in saudi patients on dialysis using arabic versions of the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) and assess the reliability of the scales. the cognitive assessment included a brief screening of global cognitive function, using the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) ( english, arabic and hebrew versions were used, according to the. the subject must tap moca test arabic pdf with his hand at each letter a. do 2 trials, even if 1st trial is successful. • in lebanon, the moca arabic version is not commonly used in psychiatric illness. the only validated, widely‐ used dementia screen that has arabic language norms/ cutoffs is the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca). the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) was developed as a brief screening instrument to detect mild. yet, arabic translations of the moca vary across countries. tamazight), and arabic. 79 for the mms test. the recommended cut- off was 21/ 22 with sensitivity of 92. the later version was validated and its reliability was tested ( abdulrahman and algaafary, ). ( 1) it is a paper- and- pencil tool that requires approximately 10 minutes to administer, and is. results: test– retest reliability data of the arabic moca were collected approximately 35. calculations, and orientation. this study provides a systematic review of linguistically and culturally adapted versions of the original montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) full version. 7% and specificity of 97. the montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) is used to assesses cognitive impairment. moca test arabic version was pdf used for grading the cognitive state and to estimate the stage, and deterioration of cognitive impairment ( nasreddine et al. this study assesses the reliability and validity of montreal cognitive assessment ( moca) arabic version in mci detection and determines the prevalence of mci among apparently healthy elderly people attending geriatric clubs in cairo. moca) ∫ éjîfƒe ' ™ ñàÿg ' ô© ÿg º« « ≤ àdg á« hô© dg ᨠ∏ déh: º° s' g: io' ƒdg ïhqéj : á° sgq~ dg iƒà° ùe : ïjqéàdg : ¢ ùæ÷ g. • the moca demonstrated adequate validity as a cognitive screening tool. authors have no conflict of interests, and the. scored out of 30 points. 2% for detecting mild ncd and 16/ 17 with sensitivity of 90. concept and clinical review. 18, 25 these tests are available in arabic from the moca website, and permission to use the tests in research, with pdf minor modification27 to follow the local arabic accent, disclosure. the internal consistency of the arabic. 87, while they were 90. overall, 86 culturally different versions of moca are available: 74 versions on the moca website ( 25 of them have a corresponding paper. read list of digits ( 1 digit/ sec. scribd is the world s largest social reading and publishing site. the mean change in arabic moca scores from the first to second evaluation was 0. subject has to repeat them in the forward order. conclusion: the moroccan moca test had high sensitivity, specificity, and internal reliability compared to the mms. other moca versions are available for different patient. do a recall after 5 minutes. conclusion: the arabic moca- b is a valid cognitive assessment tool in elderly egyptian subjects. using the arabic version of the standard moca ) moca- a( and the arabic basic version ) moca- b(. cognitive impairment. the moca may be administered by anyone who understands and follows the instructions, however, only a health professional with expertise in the cognitive field may interpret the results. moca full is widely used internationally by various medical professionals and available in over 100 languages and dialects. read list of letters. the original moca in paper format ( " moca full" ) is the most sensitive and validated cognitive screening tool, supported by over 500 peer- reviewed studies. 5% and specificity of 98. time to administer the moca is approximately 10 minutes. the first edition of our guidelines for culturally adapting the montreal cognitive assessment, developed in our research " developing guidelines for the translation and cultural adaptation of the.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7080.587

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→French-language works237,207→