Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Camarotoscena Haupt, 1935 Camarotoscena Haupt 1935: 228. Type species: Rhinocola speciosa Flor, 1861, by original designation. Diagnosis: Adult. Head, in lateral view, deflexed 45–90° from longitudinal axis of body (Fig. 1C); in dorsal view, about as wide as thorax, moderately transverse. Vertex rhomboidal; covered in areolate-rugose microsculpture; passing smoothly into genae anteriorly; coronal suture fully developed; genae weakly produced ventrally but not enlarged into processes; frons elongate, parallel-sided to narrowly triangular (Fig. 3E); median ocellus not visible in perpendicular view to vertex; subgenae not differentiated into separate sclerites (Fig. 3E); compound eyes, in dorsal view, hemispherical, adpressed to head. Clypeus pear-shaped, moderate-sized, rounded ventrally, hardly visible in lateral view as it is hidden by genae. Antenna slightly longer than head width; flagellum with simple setae; segment 3 longest, as long as segments 4–5 together; segments 4, 6, 8, and 9 bearing each a subapical rhinarium lacking marginal spines. Thorax moderately slender; dorsal outline, in lateral view, weakly curved. Pronotum, in dorsal view, weakly curved posteriad laterally; propleurites subrectangular, divided by perpendicular suture into subequal epimeron and episternum. Metapostnotum with blunt tubercle. Mesosternum (Fig. 5B) narrower than head, forming transverse band more than three times as wide as long laterally; anterior margin weakly concave; pleurosternal suture hardly visible; basisternum triangular; katepisternum small antero-laterally, not bent dorsad laterally; angle of arms of precoxale obtuse. Pro- and mesotibiae cylindrical. Metacoxa with blunt, moderately long, horn-shaped meracanthus. Metafemur with the three ventral sense organs in the middle; apex with few stout long setae (Fig. 6O). Metatibia longer than metafemur, distinctly widened apically; bearing 9–12 slightly irregularly spaced apical sclerotized spurs and two to four peg-like setae adjacent to inner spurs (Fig. 7C). Both metatarsal segments relatively short, subequal in length. Forewing slightly subtrapezoidal; costal and anal margins subparallel or widening towards apex, 2.2–2.3 times as long as wide, membranous; vein C + Sc weakly, evenly convex, slender, distinctly delimited from cell; costal break developed, close to apex of vein R 1; pterostigma wide, entirely membranous; nodal line developed; veins R and M + Cu subequal; vein Rs relatively straight; vein M about as long as M 1 + 2; vein Cu 1a almost straight or weakly curved towards anal margin; veins M 1 + 2 and M 3 + 4 oblique to wing margin apically; anal break adjacent to apex of vein Cu 1b; surface spinules fine or coarse, spaced or dense, present in all cells. Hindwing slightly shorter than forewing; with one or two costal setae proximal to costal break and two clearly separated groups of two to four proximal and two to four distal setae, distal to costal break; vein R + M + Cu indistinctly trifurcating, base of vein Cu indistinct. Abdominal base with a sclerotized area on either side covered in spines. Aedeagus with simple proximal portion bearing many weak folds subapically; apex of distal portion not differentiated from stem. Female subgenital plate lacking apical process. Last instar immature. Antenna seven segments; lacking sectasetae or lanceolate setae on antennal flagellum. Mid- and hindlegs without massive peg-like setae. Dorsal body surface lacking minute clavate setae. Precaudal abdominal tergites bearing densely spaced simple setae and sectasetae. Anus in ventral position; with additional pore fields developed. Comments: Monophyletic with strong molecular support, morphologically supported by two homoplastic characters that we consider non-unique synapomorphies (Figs 10, 11; Supporting Information, File S4). The circumscription of the genus by Burckhardt and Mifsud (2003) is supported here. Included available species, distribution, and host plants are summarized in Table 3 and Supporting Information, File S3.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».