MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911909414 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13304565

Camarotoscena Haupt 1935

2023· article· en· W6911909414 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBent molecular geometryDorsumPerpendicularApex (geometry)Transverse planeFibrous jointSeta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camarotoscena Haupt, 1935 Camarotoscena Haupt 1935: 228. Type species: Rhinocola speciosa Flor, 1861, by original designation. Diagnosis: Adult. Head, in lateral view, deflexed 45–90° from longitudinal axis of body (Fig. 1C); in dorsal view, about as wide as thorax, moderately transverse. Vertex rhomboidal; covered in areolate-rugose microsculpture; passing smoothly into genae anteriorly; coronal suture fully developed; genae weakly produced ventrally but not enlarged into processes; frons elongate, parallel-sided to narrowly triangular (Fig. 3E); median ocellus not visible in perpendicular view to vertex; subgenae not differentiated into separate sclerites (Fig. 3E); compound eyes, in dorsal view, hemispherical, adpressed to head. Clypeus pear-shaped, moderate-sized, rounded ventrally, hardly visible in lateral view as it is hidden by genae. Antenna slightly longer than head width; flagellum with simple setae; segment 3 longest, as long as segments 4–5 together; segments 4, 6, 8, and 9 bearing each a subapical rhinarium lacking marginal spines. Thorax moderately slender; dorsal outline, in lateral view, weakly curved. Pronotum, in dorsal view, weakly curved posteriad laterally; propleurites subrectangular, divided by perpendicular suture into subequal epimeron and episternum. Metapostnotum with blunt tubercle. Mesosternum (Fig. 5B) narrower than head, forming transverse band more than three times as wide as long laterally; anterior margin weakly concave; pleurosternal suture hardly visible; basisternum triangular; katepisternum small antero-laterally, not bent dorsad laterally; angle of arms of precoxale obtuse. Pro- and mesotibiae cylindrical. Metacoxa with blunt, moderately long, horn-shaped meracanthus. Metafemur with the three ventral sense organs in the middle; apex with few stout long setae (Fig. 6O). Metatibia longer than metafemur, distinctly widened apically; bearing 9–12 slightly irregularly spaced apical sclerotized spurs and two to four peg-like setae adjacent to inner spurs (Fig. 7C). Both metatarsal segments relatively short, subequal in length. Forewing slightly subtrapezoidal; costal and anal margins subparallel or widening towards apex, 2.2–2.3 times as long as wide, membranous; vein C + Sc weakly, evenly convex, slender, distinctly delimited from cell; costal break developed, close to apex of vein R 1; pterostigma wide, entirely membranous; nodal line developed; veins R and M + Cu subequal; vein Rs relatively straight; vein M about as long as M 1 + 2; vein Cu 1a almost straight or weakly curved towards anal margin; veins M 1 + 2 and M 3 + 4 oblique to wing margin apically; anal break adjacent to apex of vein Cu 1b; surface spinules fine or coarse, spaced or dense, present in all cells. Hindwing slightly shorter than forewing; with one or two costal setae proximal to costal break and two clearly separated groups of two to four proximal and two to four distal setae, distal to costal break; vein R + M + Cu indistinctly trifurcating, base of vein Cu indistinct. Abdominal base with a sclerotized area on either side covered in spines. Aedeagus with simple proximal portion bearing many weak folds subapically; apex of distal portion not differentiated from stem. Female subgenital plate lacking apical process. Last instar immature. Antenna seven segments; lacking sectasetae or lanceolate setae on antennal flagellum. Mid- and hindlegs without massive peg-like setae. Dorsal body surface lacking minute clavate setae. Precaudal abdominal tergites bearing densely spaced simple setae and sectasetae. Anus in ventral position; with additional pore fields developed. Comments: Monophyletic with strong molecular support, morphologically supported by two homoplastic characters that we consider non-unique synapomorphies (Figs 10, 11; Supporting Information, File S4). The circumscription of the genus by Burckhardt and Mifsud (2003) is supported here. Included available species, distribution, and host plants are summarized in Table 3 and Supporting Information, File S3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→