MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6917925145 · doi:10.58088/szd1-9045

The effects of persistent mild traumatic brain injury symptoms on the neurophysiological health of adults

2024· dissertation· en· W6917925145 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Delaware · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGaitTraumatic brain injuryCognitionConcussionQuality of life (healthcare)Depression (economics)Poison controlNeurophysiologyInjury prevention

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 70-90% of the 2.8 million TBIs sustained annually, and up to 40% of those may result in persistent symptoms lasting beyond a normal clinical recovery timeline. Persistent concussion symptoms (PCS) can manifest into life-changing disabilities, lost work and financial income, elevated risks of depression and anxiety, and reduced quality of life (QoL), as well as more subtle deficits in the ability to perform a cognitive and motor task concurrently, a common activity of daily living. Dual-task gait conditions have revealed the adaptation of a conservative gait strategy following mTBI in young athletes, however it is unknown if this strategy is present among adults with PCS. Together an assessment of symptoms, QoL, cognition, and postural control can provide an overall understanding of the subtle deficits in an adult PCS population. PURPOSE: The overall purpose of this dissertation was to identify and quantify neurophysiological impairments in adults with PCS. METHODS: For aim 1, PCS patients (n=15, 43.9+11.8 years, 11 females, 110-1314 days since injury) and healthy controls (n=24, 41.6+10.4 years, 16 females) performed dual-task gait and gait initiation conditions in a motion capture laboratory. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait, gait initiation, and cognitive variables to determine task prioritization. For aim 2, the same PCS patients and healthy controls completed questionnaires to assess symptoms and quality of life, performed a variety of common post-concussion clinical assessments (i.e.: Clinical Reaction Time, King-Devick, Tandem gait task), and a brief sensorimotor and cognitive assessment on the Kinesiological Instrument for Normal and Altered Reaching Movements (KINARM, Kingston, Ontario). Once normality was established, groups were compared using either an independent samples t-test (normal distribution) or a Mann-Whitney U test (non-normal distribution). Additionally, for aim 2, we examined the associations between KINARM variables and clinical assessment performance using a Pearson correlation test. A point-biserial correlation was run to determine the relationship between KINARM variables and VOMS failure (a categorical variable). RESULTS: For aim 1, PCS patients had significantly worse DTCs for gait (e.g.: Gait Speed DTCs: PCS = -13.1 + 11.9%, Controls = -4.3 + 6.4%, p = 0.009, d = .921) and gait initiation (e.g.: APA phase M/L displacement (-34.8 + 21.8% and -10.6 + 25.3%, p = .004, d = 1.01) when compared to the healthy controls. For aim 2, PCS patients had significantly worse symptoms, psychological issues, and overall quality of life compared to healthy controls (e.g.: Rivermead number of symptoms (Range = 0-16): PCS = 13.5 + 2.2, Controls = 4.0 + 3.8, p < .001, r = .794). Additionally, PCS patients had significantly worse performance on most clinical assessments (e.g.: clinical mean reaction time: PCS = 238.3 + 47.3 msec, Controls = 208.3 + 18.0 msec, p = .035, r =.337), however no significant differences between groups were observed on any of the tandem gait task variables. No significant differences were observed between groups on the predominantly motor-based KINARM tasks (e.g.: Trail-Making Test A: PCS = 62.0 + 57.8 sec, Controls = 37.1 + 8.4 sec, p = .106, r = .254), however several significant differences were observed between groups on the more cognitively demanding tasks (Trail-Making Test B: PCS = 76.3 + 62.8 sec, Controls = 42.3 + 10.4, p = .044, r = .324). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that adults experiencing persistent concussion symptoms have impairments when performing a dual task, which reflects a conservative gait strategy when additional cognitive resources are required to perform a cognitive and a motor task concurrently. This study also identified more subtle sensorimotor and cognitive deficits in PCS patients using the novel KINARM assessment tool, further suggesting that adults with persistent concussion symptoms have impaired cognitive function when required to perform an upper body cognitive-motor dual task. Furthermore, as expected, the PCS patients had worse self-reported symptoms, psychological issues, and quality of life, as well as performance on clinical tests for post-concussion assessment of neurophysiological health. This suggests that these assessments, which have primarily been used on high school and college student-athletes, are also able to identify patients experiencing persistent concussion symptoms.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of DelawareMême sujetTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTravaux en français237 207