MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917925145 · doi:10.58088/szd1-9045

The effects of persistent mild traumatic brain injury symptoms on the neurophysiological health of adults

2024· dissertation· en· W6917925145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Delaware · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaitTraumatic brain injuryCognitionConcussionQuality of life (healthcare)Depression (economics)Poison controlNeurophysiologyInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for approximately 70-90% of the 2.8 million TBIs sustained annually, and up to 40% of those may result in persistent symptoms lasting beyond a normal clinical recovery timeline. Persistent concussion symptoms (PCS) can manifest into life-changing disabilities, lost work and financial income, elevated risks of depression and anxiety, and reduced quality of life (QoL), as well as more subtle deficits in the ability to perform a cognitive and motor task concurrently, a common activity of daily living. Dual-task gait conditions have revealed the adaptation of a conservative gait strategy following mTBI in young athletes, however it is unknown if this strategy is present among adults with PCS. Together an assessment of symptoms, QoL, cognition, and postural control can provide an overall understanding of the subtle deficits in an adult PCS population. PURPOSE: The overall purpose of this dissertation was to identify and quantify neurophysiological impairments in adults with PCS. METHODS: For aim 1, PCS patients (n=15, 43.9+11.8 years, 11 females, 110-1314 days since injury) and healthy controls (n=24, 41.6+10.4 years, 16 females) performed dual-task gait and gait initiation conditions in a motion capture laboratory. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait, gait initiation, and cognitive variables to determine task prioritization. For aim 2, the same PCS patients and healthy controls completed questionnaires to assess symptoms and quality of life, performed a variety of common post-concussion clinical assessments (i.e.: Clinical Reaction Time, King-Devick, Tandem gait task), and a brief sensorimotor and cognitive assessment on the Kinesiological Instrument for Normal and Altered Reaching Movements (KINARM, Kingston, Ontario). Once normality was established, groups were compared using either an independent samples t-test (normal distribution) or a Mann-Whitney U test (non-normal distribution). Additionally, for aim 2, we examined the associations between KINARM variables and clinical assessment performance using a Pearson correlation test. A point-biserial correlation was run to determine the relationship between KINARM variables and VOMS failure (a categorical variable). RESULTS: For aim 1, PCS patients had significantly worse DTCs for gait (e.g.: Gait Speed DTCs: PCS = -13.1 + 11.9%, Controls = -4.3 + 6.4%, p = 0.009, d = .921) and gait initiation (e.g.: APA phase M/L displacement (-34.8 + 21.8% and -10.6 + 25.3%, p = .004, d = 1.01) when compared to the healthy controls. For aim 2, PCS patients had significantly worse symptoms, psychological issues, and overall quality of life compared to healthy controls (e.g.: Rivermead number of symptoms (Range = 0-16): PCS = 13.5 + 2.2, Controls = 4.0 + 3.8, p < .001, r = .794). Additionally, PCS patients had significantly worse performance on most clinical assessments (e.g.: clinical mean reaction time: PCS = 238.3 + 47.3 msec, Controls = 208.3 + 18.0 msec, p = .035, r =.337), however no significant differences between groups were observed on any of the tandem gait task variables. No significant differences were observed between groups on the predominantly motor-based KINARM tasks (e.g.: Trail-Making Test A: PCS = 62.0 + 57.8 sec, Controls = 37.1 + 8.4 sec, p = .106, r = .254), however several significant differences were observed between groups on the more cognitively demanding tasks (Trail-Making Test B: PCS = 76.3 + 62.8 sec, Controls = 42.3 + 10.4, p = .044, r = .324). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that adults experiencing persistent concussion symptoms have impairments when performing a dual task, which reflects a conservative gait strategy when additional cognitive resources are required to perform a cognitive and a motor task concurrently. This study also identified more subtle sensorimotor and cognitive deficits in PCS patients using the novel KINARM assessment tool, further suggesting that adults with persistent concussion symptoms have impaired cognitive function when required to perform an upper body cognitive-motor dual task. Furthermore, as expected, the PCS patients had worse self-reported symptoms, psychological issues, and quality of life, as well as performance on clinical tests for post-concussion assessment of neurophysiological health. This suggests that these assessments, which have primarily been used on high school and college student-athletes, are also able to identify patients experiencing persistent concussion symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of DelawareSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207