MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6929798685 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10248572

Glyptothrips Hood

2023· article· en· W6929798685 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaCharacter (mathematics)GenusTelsonReticulate

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Glyptothrips Hood Glyptothrips Hood, 1912: 116. Type species Glyptothrips flavescens Hood, 1912, by monotypy. There is no unique character state to diagnose this genus, but the following combination of character states seem useful to distinguish a member of the genus from other Glyptothripini: (1) body strongly reticulate (Figs 6, 15, 58), except the tube which has at most some weak sculpture basally (Figs 16, 45, 59); (2) pronotal AM reduced (Figs 20, 32, 69); (3) pterothoracic ventrolateral setae usually thick and capitate (Figs 21, 33, 62), except in G. arkansanus, G. bucca, G. flavescens and G. reticulatus. In addition, all observed Glyptothrips species share the following: head incut behind globose/moruloid eyes (Figs 26, 48); PO setae and all pronotal setae except AM well-developed with dilated tips (Figs 15, 32); antennal segments II–IV with at least one pair of capitate setae (except in G. bucca) (Fig. 35); prosternal basantra present; tube with straight, tapering sides (Figs 7, 11); fore tarsi armed with a tooth (except in G. arkansanus) (Figs 42, 48); fore wings without duplicated cilia. Character state variation amongst included species: Colouration: Body structures vary in colour, which is heavily influenced by how the specimen was prepared for slide mounting: many species were described from individuals not macerated in NaOH prior to mounting. Several type specimens were also mounted initially in Hoyers, a mounting media not as durable as Canada Balsam, and much colour information could be modified or lost (e.g. Figs 28–30). Some patterns remain useful for identifications. Original descriptions state some species are yellowish (e.g. G. interior — Fig. 41 and G. silvaticus — Fig. 61) or darker brown (e.g. G. claviger — Fig. 14 and G. subcalvus — Fig. 66). However, some macerated specimens identified structurally as G. subcalvus have a lighter, yellowish colour (e.g. Figs 69–72). Antennae are frequently of similar colour to the head, with distal antennal segments progressively darker, and darker antennal segments (especially IV–VI) often have the basal areas and/or pedicels lighter (Figs 25, 35, 43). In G. arkansanus the antennae are mostly yellow with only the last antennal segment slightly darker (Fig. 5); and G. subcalvus has the first two antennal segments very pale yellow, much lighter than the head (Figs 66, 68). Head and thorax are commonly the same colour (Figs 9, 41), or the thorax is partially or fully darker than the head (Figs 47, 57). The abdomen is frequently paler or gets progressively paler distally (Fig. 31). Some species have a darker antecostal ridge and/or spot on tergites II–VII (G. divergens — Fig. 19; G. interior — Fig. 41; G. saltuarius — Fig. 57; G. silvaticus — Fig. 61). Some species have two longitudinal pale lines dividing the tergites into thirds (G. arkansanus — Figs 5–7), and the posteromedian area of the tergite may be much paler. Similar lines are present but not as obvious in G. flavescens (Fig. 26), and in G. subcalvus the tergal median third seems to be darker than the rest of the abdomen (Fig. 66). The tube is also variable between species, but more commonly a similar (Figs 7, 27) or darker colour to the previous abdominal segments (Figs 22, 65). The basal and/or apical areas of the tube are frequently lighter or darker than the middle of the tube (Figs 45, 73). Head: all Glyptothrips species have the head fully covered by strong reticulation, both on dorsal and ventral surfaces (Figs 6, 20, 67). The genae vary from almost straight (G. divergens — Fig. 20; G. hylaeus — Fig. 38), to strongly curved (G. bucca — Fig. 10; G. subcalvus — Fig. 67). Observed head length x greatest width ratio from original descriptions vary from 1 (G. floridensis) to 1.5 (G. longiceps). However, this character should be used with caution; it can be affected by slide mounting, and ranges can overlap between species (Table 2). ...Continued on the next page ¹All given ratios and measures were obtained from original descriptions and/or the individuals listed in the “observed specimens” section under each species in the manuscript. Intraspecific variation has not been studied for the majority of the species due to the limited number of individuals available. Most species in the genus have small and acute postocellar, occipital and head lateral setae, but G. floridensis is illustrated by Stannard (1955) with the occipital and many lateral setae as long and capitate as the PO. The occipital setae have dilated tips also in G. claviger (Fig. 15) and G. interior (Fig. 42), but neither of these species has the head lateral setae thickened or capitate. Length of PO varies from very short and inconspicuous (G. divergens — Fig. 20), to as long or longer than the compound eye (G. silvaticus — Fig. 63) (Table 2). Antennae: the type species, G. flavescens, has only 7 antennal segments with antennal segments VII and VIII fused (Fig. 26). G. arkansanus approximates this condition in the genus, with antennal segments VII–VIII broadly joined but separated by a suture. All other Glyptothrips species have VII and VIII clearly separated (Figs 12, 23, 35). The most common sense cone formula in Glyptothrips is 3 sense cones on antennal segment III and 4 on IV. However, reductions in the number of sense cones are known in G. bucca, G. flavescens, G. interior, G. reticulatus and G. subcalvus (Table 2). The shape of antennal segments is also variable within the genus, from very short and globose in G. flavescens (Fig. 26) and G. arkansanus (Fig. 5), to elongate in G. divergens (Fig. 23) and G. fuscipes (Fig. 35). Some species are also intermediate between these extremes, such as G. bucca, G. subcalvus (short but not globose antennal segments), G. hylaeus or G. silvaticus. Prothorax: most species have the pronotum reticulate (Figs 6, 20), but the sculpture can be less obvious in some species (Fig. 69). The epimeral sutures are usually incomplete. The position of AA setae is at or very close to the pronotum anterior angles in most Glyptothrips species, but in at least G. flavescens (Fig. 26) and G. floridensis this pair of setae arises close to AM. Pterothorax: meso- and metanotum are both clearly sculptured, usually with equiangular reticles without any internal markings (Figs 6, 21). However, at least G. flavescens and some specimens of G. claviger have “tubercles” in the metanotum, in place of some of the sculpture lines (Fig. 26). The ventrolateral setae are thick and capitate in most Glyptothrips (Figs 21, 62), with the only exceptions listed in the proposed diagnosis above. Legs: all legs usually have similar sizes and sculpturing, and are covered in many acute setae (Figs 5–6, 14–15). The fore tibia does not have tubercles. In G. fuscipes, all femora and the fore tibiae have at least one or two elongate, thick and capitate setae (Figs 31, 33); most other Glyptothrips species lack such setae, although a short but capitate seta has been seen in the fore femora of some specimens of G. claviger, G. longiceps, G. reticulatus, G. silvaticus (Fig. 63) and G. subcalvus. Wings: there are multiple wing forms within the genus, with macropterous (Fig. 5), micropterous (Fig. 15) and apterous (Fig. 55) specimens known. Five species (G. arkansanus, G. flavescens, G. reticulatus, G. saltuarius and G. subcalvus) are known to have two or more wing morphs. The degree of wing development is frequently associated to changes in some character states, especially when comparing macropterae (eyes sometimes larger, ocelli present, pelta not as wide) with apterae (eyes sometimes reduced, ocelli reduced or absent, pelta wide and rectangular or oval in shape) (Mound 1977, 2005; Mound & Marullo 1996; personal observations). Abdomen: the pelta is highly variable, and at least partially associated with the degree of wing development. The most common shape seems to be a broad oval or rectangular plate (Figs 10, 26, 44, 69), however some species may have a triangular, trapezoidal (Figs 15, 36) or hat-shaped (Fig. 6) pelta. Tergites II–IX are sculptured, with the median posterior area weaker or sometimes smooth (Figs 6, 44, 58). The three main setal pairs on tergite IX are well developed, with S2 reduced in males (Fig. 45). Setae S1 are most frequently dilated or capitate (Figs 45, 73), while S2 are more frequently acute or blunt (Table 2). The tube is mostly smooth, with weak lines of sculpture basally (Figs 7, 16, 39), but never with strong reticulation as in Chamaeothrips Hood or Eschatothrips species. The tube is usually shorter than the head or almost as long as the head; only two species (G. divergens and G. flavescens) have recorded specimens where the tube is slightly longer than the head (Figs 19, 25).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→Travaux en français237 207→