MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6929798685 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10248572

Glyptothrips Hood

2023· article· en· W6929798685 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaCharacter (mathematics)GenusTelsonReticulate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glyptothrips Hood Glyptothrips Hood, 1912: 116. Type species Glyptothrips flavescens Hood, 1912, by monotypy. There is no unique character state to diagnose this genus, but the following combination of character states seem useful to distinguish a member of the genus from other Glyptothripini: (1) body strongly reticulate (Figs 6, 15, 58), except the tube which has at most some weak sculpture basally (Figs 16, 45, 59); (2) pronotal AM reduced (Figs 20, 32, 69); (3) pterothoracic ventrolateral setae usually thick and capitate (Figs 21, 33, 62), except in G. arkansanus, G. bucca, G. flavescens and G. reticulatus. In addition, all observed Glyptothrips species share the following: head incut behind globose/moruloid eyes (Figs 26, 48); PO setae and all pronotal setae except AM well-developed with dilated tips (Figs 15, 32); antennal segments II–IV with at least one pair of capitate setae (except in G. bucca) (Fig. 35); prosternal basantra present; tube with straight, tapering sides (Figs 7, 11); fore tarsi armed with a tooth (except in G. arkansanus) (Figs 42, 48); fore wings without duplicated cilia. Character state variation amongst included species: Colouration: Body structures vary in colour, which is heavily influenced by how the specimen was prepared for slide mounting: many species were described from individuals not macerated in NaOH prior to mounting. Several type specimens were also mounted initially in Hoyers, a mounting media not as durable as Canada Balsam, and much colour information could be modified or lost (e.g. Figs 28–30). Some patterns remain useful for identifications. Original descriptions state some species are yellowish (e.g. G. interior — Fig. 41 and G. silvaticus — Fig. 61) or darker brown (e.g. G. claviger — Fig. 14 and G. subcalvus — Fig. 66). However, some macerated specimens identified structurally as G. subcalvus have a lighter, yellowish colour (e.g. Figs 69–72). Antennae are frequently of similar colour to the head, with distal antennal segments progressively darker, and darker antennal segments (especially IV–VI) often have the basal areas and/or pedicels lighter (Figs 25, 35, 43). In G. arkansanus the antennae are mostly yellow with only the last antennal segment slightly darker (Fig. 5); and G. subcalvus has the first two antennal segments very pale yellow, much lighter than the head (Figs 66, 68). Head and thorax are commonly the same colour (Figs 9, 41), or the thorax is partially or fully darker than the head (Figs 47, 57). The abdomen is frequently paler or gets progressively paler distally (Fig. 31). Some species have a darker antecostal ridge and/or spot on tergites II–VII (G. divergens — Fig. 19; G. interior — Fig. 41; G. saltuarius — Fig. 57; G. silvaticus — Fig. 61). Some species have two longitudinal pale lines dividing the tergites into thirds (G. arkansanus — Figs 5–7), and the posteromedian area of the tergite may be much paler. Similar lines are present but not as obvious in G. flavescens (Fig. 26), and in G. subcalvus the tergal median third seems to be darker than the rest of the abdomen (Fig. 66). The tube is also variable between species, but more commonly a similar (Figs 7, 27) or darker colour to the previous abdominal segments (Figs 22, 65). The basal and/or apical areas of the tube are frequently lighter or darker than the middle of the tube (Figs 45, 73). Head: all Glyptothrips species have the head fully covered by strong reticulation, both on dorsal and ventral surfaces (Figs 6, 20, 67). The genae vary from almost straight (G. divergens — Fig. 20; G. hylaeus — Fig. 38), to strongly curved (G. bucca — Fig. 10; G. subcalvus — Fig. 67). Observed head length x greatest width ratio from original descriptions vary from 1 (G. floridensis) to 1.5 (G. longiceps). However, this character should be used with caution; it can be affected by slide mounting, and ranges can overlap between species (Table 2). ...Continued on the next page ¹All given ratios and measures were obtained from original descriptions and/or the individuals listed in the “observed specimens” section under each species in the manuscript. Intraspecific variation has not been studied for the majority of the species due to the limited number of individuals available. Most species in the genus have small and acute postocellar, occipital and head lateral setae, but G. floridensis is illustrated by Stannard (1955) with the occipital and many lateral setae as long and capitate as the PO. The occipital setae have dilated tips also in G. claviger (Fig. 15) and G. interior (Fig. 42), but neither of these species has the head lateral setae thickened or capitate. Length of PO varies from very short and inconspicuous (G. divergens — Fig. 20), to as long or longer than the compound eye (G. silvaticus — Fig. 63) (Table 2). Antennae: the type species, G. flavescens, has only 7 antennal segments with antennal segments VII and VIII fused (Fig. 26). G. arkansanus approximates this condition in the genus, with antennal segments VII–VIII broadly joined but separated by a suture. All other Glyptothrips species have VII and VIII clearly separated (Figs 12, 23, 35). The most common sense cone formula in Glyptothrips is 3 sense cones on antennal segment III and 4 on IV. However, reductions in the number of sense cones are known in G. bucca, G. flavescens, G. interior, G. reticulatus and G. subcalvus (Table 2). The shape of antennal segments is also variable within the genus, from very short and globose in G. flavescens (Fig. 26) and G. arkansanus (Fig. 5), to elongate in G. divergens (Fig. 23) and G. fuscipes (Fig. 35). Some species are also intermediate between these extremes, such as G. bucca, G. subcalvus (short but not globose antennal segments), G. hylaeus or G. silvaticus. Prothorax: most species have the pronotum reticulate (Figs 6, 20), but the sculpture can be less obvious in some species (Fig. 69). The epimeral sutures are usually incomplete. The position of AA setae is at or very close to the pronotum anterior angles in most Glyptothrips species, but in at least G. flavescens (Fig. 26) and G. floridensis this pair of setae arises close to AM. Pterothorax: meso- and metanotum are both clearly sculptured, usually with equiangular reticles without any internal markings (Figs 6, 21). However, at least G. flavescens and some specimens of G. claviger have “tubercles” in the metanotum, in place of some of the sculpture lines (Fig. 26). The ventrolateral setae are thick and capitate in most Glyptothrips (Figs 21, 62), with the only exceptions listed in the proposed diagnosis above. Legs: all legs usually have similar sizes and sculpturing, and are covered in many acute setae (Figs 5–6, 14–15). The fore tibia does not have tubercles. In G. fuscipes, all femora and the fore tibiae have at least one or two elongate, thick and capitate setae (Figs 31, 33); most other Glyptothrips species lack such setae, although a short but capitate seta has been seen in the fore femora of some specimens of G. claviger, G. longiceps, G. reticulatus, G. silvaticus (Fig. 63) and G. subcalvus. Wings: there are multiple wing forms within the genus, with macropterous (Fig. 5), micropterous (Fig. 15) and apterous (Fig. 55) specimens known. Five species (G. arkansanus, G. flavescens, G. reticulatus, G. saltuarius and G. subcalvus) are known to have two or more wing morphs. The degree of wing development is frequently associated to changes in some character states, especially when comparing macropterae (eyes sometimes larger, ocelli present, pelta not as wide) with apterae (eyes sometimes reduced, ocelli reduced or absent, pelta wide and rectangular or oval in shape) (Mound 1977, 2005; Mound & Marullo 1996; personal observations). Abdomen: the pelta is highly variable, and at least partially associated with the degree of wing development. The most common shape seems to be a broad oval or rectangular plate (Figs 10, 26, 44, 69), however some species may have a triangular, trapezoidal (Figs 15, 36) or hat-shaped (Fig. 6) pelta. Tergites II–IX are sculptured, with the median posterior area weaker or sometimes smooth (Figs 6, 44, 58). The three main setal pairs on tergite IX are well developed, with S2 reduced in males (Fig. 45). Setae S1 are most frequently dilated or capitate (Figs 45, 73), while S2 are more frequently acute or blunt (Table 2). The tube is mostly smooth, with weak lines of sculpture basally (Figs 7, 16, 39), but never with strong reticulation as in Chamaeothrips Hood or Eschatothrips species. The tube is usually shorter than the head or almost as long as the head; only two species (G. divergens and G. flavescens) have recorded specimens where the tube is slightly longer than the head (Figs 19, 25).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→French-language works237,207→