MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930665149 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15801414

Acuminiseta;Aluligera;Anatalanta;Anomioptera;Anommonia;Apterobiroina;Apteromyia;Aptilotella;Aptilotus;Archiceroptera;Archicollinella;Archileptocera;Aspinilimonina;Bentrovata;Biroina;Bitheca;Bromeloecia;Ceroptera;Chaetopodella;Chespiritos;Coproica;Druciatus;Elachisoma;Gobersa;Gonioneura;Herniosina;Howickia;Indiosina;Kabaria;Lepidosina;Leptocera;Limomyza;Limosina;Limosinella;Lobeliomyia;Mesaptilotus;Minilimosina;Monteithiana;Myrmolimosina;Nearcticorpus;Ocellipsis;Ocellusia;Opacifrons;Opalimosina;Oribatomyia;Otwayia;Pachytarsella;Palaeocoprina;Papualimosina;Papuellicesa;Paralimosina;Paraptilotus;Parasclerocoelus;Paraspelobia;Pellucialula;Philocoprella;Phthitia;Pismira;Pleuroseta;Poecilosomella;Popondetta;Pseudocollinella;Pteremis;Pterogramma;Pterogrammoides;Pullimosina;Puncticorpus;Rachispoda;Reunionia;Robustagramma;Rudolfina;Sclerocoelus;Scutelliseta;Siphlopteryx;Spelobia;Spinilimosina;Telomerina;Terrilimosina;Thoracochaeta;Trachyopella;Trisetomyia;Xenolimosina Macquart 1835

2025· article· en· W6930665149 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBristleWingDorsumSubfamilyBent molecular geometryKey (lock)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Subfamily Limosininae Macquart, 1835 Key to species of the Pterogramma -like genera of the Pacific and Indomalayan regions Couplets for the Pterogrammoides species are modified from, or quoted directly from, Papp (1989). Couplets for the Parapterogramma species originally described as Minialula are based on Hayashi (2013). 1. Mid tibia with a single dorsal bristle on distal half (as in Fig. 70A). Orbital bristles very small and fine (Fig. 70B). Wing long and narrow, crossveins in basal third of wing (Figs 70C, 72C). Abdominal sclerites strongly reduced or absent................................................2 (Pterogrammoides Papp, 2008) – Mid tibia with at least two dorsal bristles on distal half (as in Fig. 25A). Orbital bristles strong. Wing broad and ovoid, crossveins in middle of wing (Figs 40–41, 68). Abdominal sclerites desclerotized around edges but otherwise well-developed...................................................................................... 6 2. Scutum with distinct pattern of yellowish spots. Lateral sclerites of female T8 very large. One pair of orbital bristles; katepisternal bristle absent. Wing infuscate, darkest along veins .......................... ................................................................................................... Pt. poecilosomus Papp, 1972 (PNG) – Scutum unicolourous, orange-brown to brown. Lateral sclerites of female T8 smaller. Two pairs of orbital bristles; katepisternal bristle present. Wing very lightly patterned ........................................ 3 3. Male S6–8 large, as wide as or wider than T1+2 (Papp 1989: figs 10, 26). Posteromedial process of surstylus thin, blade-like (Papp 1989: figs 15, 32). Postgonite strongly bent distally, apex truncate (Papp 1989: figs 14, 30)..................................................................................................................... 4 – Male S6–8 smaller, distinctly narrower than T1+2 (Papp 1989: figs 1, 16). Posteromedial process of surstylus stout, rounded (Papp 1989: figs 3, 17). Postgonite gently curved distally, apex tapered (Papp 1989: figs 5, 19)....................................................................................................................... 5 4. Length of male S6–7 1.3× epandrial width, epandrium with short setae (Papp 1989: fig. 10). “Postgonite curved in apical third” (Papp 1989: fig. 14). Surstylus with one large seta and one slightly smaller ventromedial tooth-like seta (Papp 1989: figs 13, 15) ............................................... .............................................................................................................. Pt. indicus Papp, 1989 (IND) – Length of male S6–7 1.7× epandrial width, epandrium with longer setae (Papp 1989: fig. 26). “Postgonite curved in apical fifth” (Papp 1989: fig. 31). Surstylus with one very large ventromedial tooth-like seta and a much finer ventromedial seta (Papp 1989: figs 32–33)...................................... ................................................................................................................. Pt. thaii Papp, 1989 (THA) 5. Wing reduced, extending at most to end of T4. Postgonite “arcuately bent in its whole length, apex rounded, posterior margin serrate” (Fig. 71B). Surstylus anteroapically bare, with two stout apical setae, ventromedial tooth-like setae large and flat (Fig. 71A)............. Pt. baloghi Papp, 1972 (PNG) – Wing extending beyond end of abdomen. Postgonite “more strongly bent, apex narrower”, posterior margin smooth (Papp 1989: fig. 19). Surstylus anteroapically densely setulose, without stout apical setae, ventromedial tooth-like setae small, conical (Papp 1989: figs 17–18) ..................................... ..................................................................................................... Pt. longipennis Papp, 1972 (PNG) 6. Head and thorax without a pattern of microtomentose areas, often bare and shiny (as in Fig. 51B). Anterior pair of dorsocentral bristles arising just before suture (as in Fig. 54A)................................ ...................................................................................................7 (Pseudopterogramma Papp, 2008) – Head and thorax with silvery microtomentum forming patterns (as in Fig. 2B). Anterior pair of dorsocentral bristles arising just behind suture (as in Fig. 3A) ........................................................... .....................................................................................................18 (Parapterogramma Papp, 2008) 7. Postpedicel conical apically. Surstylus with stout tooth-like apical setae (Papp 2008: fig. 82). Female epiproct and hypoproct strongly reduced. M 4 (= CuA of most recent authors) usually ending at dm-m (= dm-cu), sometimes extending very slightly beyond (Papp 2008: fig. 318)............................................................................ Ps. metatarsalis (Papp, 2008) (SGP, THA) – Postpedicel rounded apically. Surstylus never with stout tooth-like apical setae. Female epiproct and hypoproct well-developed and distinct. M 4 usually extending beyond dm-m (Fig. 68).................... 8 8. Hind tarsomeres greatly expanded and dorsoventrally flattened, fore tarsomeres slightly flattened (Fig. 43A) ................................................................................. Ps. aestivale (Richards, 1973) (AUS) – Fore and hind tarsomeres cylindrical, sometimes swollen but not dorsoventrally flattened (as in Fig. 66A)............................................................................................................................................ 9 9. Wing largely hyaline, with a dark spot around R 1 or R 2+3 (Fig. 58B–C, G) .................................... 10 – Wing distinctly patterned, with light and dark areas (Fig. 58A, D–F, H–J) .................................... 12 10. Interfrontal bristles in four large pairs, approximately as thick as anterior orbital bristle (Fig. 48B). Hind tibia uniformly brown (Fig. 48A). Surstylus divided into anterior and posterior lobes (Fig. 49B)................. Ps. brevivenosum (Tenorio, 1967) (COK, FJI, PNG, PYF, TON, USA, WSM) – Interfrontal bristles in three small pairs, distinctly weaker than anterior orbital bristle (Figs 46B, 60B). Basal third to half of hind tibia yellow, distinctly paler than apical half (Figs 46A, 60A). Surstylus with a single lobe, either curving anteriorly (Fig. 47B) or posteriorly (Fig. 61B) ...........11 11. Male mid tibia with a double row of stout apicoventral setae. M 4 extending distinctly beyond dm-m (Fig. 68B). Surstylus curved anteriorly, apex pointed (Fig. 47B). Postgonite very slightly sinuate, very narrow, apex simple (Fig. 47A). Basiphallus large (~0.6× length of postgonite)....................... ............................................................................. Ps. annectens (Richards, 1964) (IDN, PNG, SLB) – Male mid tibia with a small midventral bristle and a small apicoventral bristle. M 4 not developed past dm-m (Fig. 68G). Surstylus curved posteriorly, apex rounded (Fig. 61B). Postgonite curved, broader (length ~5.5 × medial width), apex with several spine-like inner lobes (Fig. 61A). Basiphallus small (~0.3 × length of postgonite)................................................................ Ps. kasut sp. nov. (IDN, SGP) 12. Hind tibia with a large dorsal preapical seta (as in Fig. 66A) ......................................................... 13 – Hind tibia with uniformly short dorsal setae (as in Fig. 54A)......................................................... 16 13. Fore and mid tibiae brown with central third yellow, sometimes yellow area indistinct (Fig. 51A). Male S5 with a posteroventral flange on left third (Fig. 52C). Posterior lobe of surstylus elongate and sinuate, relatively parallel-sided throughout (Fig. 52B). Postgonite with three distinct, strong bends, strongly tapered after apical bend (Fig. 52A) ...................................................................................... ......................................................... Ps. conicum (Richards, 1946) (AUS, FSM, GUM, PLW, PNG) – Fore and mid tibiae solid brown, without any yellow banding (as in Fig. 57A). Male S5 simple, without any additional posteroventral lobes (Fig. 58C; Papp 2008: figs 121, 130). Posterior lobe of surstylus triangular (Fig. 58B) or rectangular (Papp 2008: figs 126, 132). Postgonite gently sinuate and gradually tapered...................................................................................................................... 14 14. Scutum yellow-orange, contrasting strongly with dark brown pleuron (Fig. 57A). Male S5 asymmetrical, strongly reduced on right side and rectangular on the left; setae limited to a transverse row of eight posteromedial setae (Fig. 58C). Posterior lobe of surstylus distinctly smaller than anterior lobe (Fig. 58B) ............................................................................... Ps. fijiensis sp. nov. (FJI) – Scutum brown, concolourous or nearly so with pleuron (as in Fig. 66A). Male S5 almost symmetrical, both sides rectangular and well-developed; uniformly short-setose (Papp 2008: figs 121, 130). Posterior lobe of surstylus distinctly larger than anterior lobe (Papp 2008: figs 126, 132)............. 15 15. Posterior lobe of surstylus with a short (length 1.0× height) apicoventral point, anterior lobe smooth ventrally (Papp 2008: fig. 132). Postgonite slightly broadened subbasally (Papp 2008: fig. 133)...... ............................................................................................... Ps. insulare (Papp, 1972) (IDN, PNG) – Posterior lobe of surstylus with a long (length 2.1 × height) apicoventral point, anterior lobe with a triangular posteroventral lobe (Papp 2008: fig. 126). Postgonite almost parallel-sided, gradually tapered and not broadened subbasally (Papp 2008: fig. 128) ........................

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,626
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0110,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0090,005
Bibliométrie0,0070,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,009
Communication savante0,0100,002
Science ouverte0,0170,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchTravaux en français237 207