MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931101227 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3850194

Nonnus spurius Wahl & Bennett 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6931101227 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueInfectious Diseases and Mycology
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDorsumLobeOvipositorFibrous jointAntenna (radio)Fundus (uterus)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Nonnus spurius Wahl & Bennett, sp. nov. (Figs. 6–8, 11, 16) Diagnosis. Nonnus spurius can be distinguished from other North and Central American species of Nonnus by the combination of the following characters: eyes strongly convergent ventrally; female flagellar band symmetrical, not extending further on dorsal surface than on ventral surface; female body uniformly black/fuscous; female mesopleuron weakly granulate with distinct punctures separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter; ovipositor 2.2–2.4× as long as length of hind femur, straight with apical 0.3 slightly decurved; male supra-antennal area lacking median lamellar projections; male mesosoma black/fuscous, metasoma with T1, most of T2, and T5+ dark brown and T3–4 light to deep brownish-red. Description. Female. Structure. 1. Supraclypeal area centrally granulosopunctate, punctures shallow and separated by 0.2–0.3× their diameter; supraclypeal width just below antennal sockets: width just above clypeal suture = 1.0: 0.7; eyes strongly convergent ventrally. 2. Supra-antennal area without projections; antenna with 38–42 flagellomeres. 3. Mesosoma elongate (Figs. 6–8), about 1.7× as long as deep. 4. Lateral face of pronotum with posterodorsal area centrally weakly to moderately granulate with small scattered shallow punctures, dorsal and posterior margins crenulate. 5. Mesopleuron centrally granulate, punctures 15–21 μm in diameter and separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter. 6. Mesoscutum with lateral lobe granulate with shallow punctures separated by 0.3–1.0× their diameter; median lobe defined by shallow notauli extending to slightly beyond mesoscutal midpoint. 7. Ventral division of metapleuron weakly granulate, punctures about 15 μm in diameter and separated by 1.0–2.0× their di- ameter. 8. Propodeum granulate and impunctate; carinae absent except for PTC and sections of median longitudinal carinae between PTC and propodeal apex; area anterad PTC with numerous strong rugulae, longitudinal near PTC then becoming transverse, extending about 0.8 distance to anterior propodeal margin and laterally extending almost to pleural carina. 9. MS1 slender, usually with weak dorsal convexity on petiole (Fig. 6). 10. Thyridium ovoid, granulate and of lighter color than surrounding tergite, and connected to base of T2 by narrow ridge (Fig. 11). 11. Ovipositor 2.2–2.4× as long as length as hind femur, straight with apical 0.3 slightly decurved. Color. Head black to fuscous, with apical 0.5 of mandible dark brown; antenna dark brown to fuscous except for white dorsal surfaces of flagellomeres 1–4 (becoming progressively reduced until flagellomere 4 with only narrow short strip or rarely with strip absent) and white band on flagellomeres 10–17 (comprising 6–8 flagellomeres for any one individual; note band is symmetrical, not extending further on dorsal surface than on ventral). Mesosoma black/fuscous. Fore leg with coxa and trochanter dark brown except for brownish-white ventral trochanteral surface; remainder of leg brown. Middle and hind legs dark brown except for white hind tarsomeres 2-3, and occasional apical 0.2–0.4 of hind tarsomere 1. Wings with membrane with weak brown tint, and veins brown to dark brown. Metasoma dark brown except for narrow whitish-brown apex of T2, and white apical 0.3 of ovipositor sheath. Measurements. Body 10.0– 14.3 mm (11.0 mm); fore wing 7.0– 8.8 mm (7.4 mm). Male. Structure. 1. Supraclypeal area smooth and punctate, punctures deep and separated by 0.2–0.3× their diameter; supraclypeal width just below antennal sockets: width just above clypeal suture = 1.0: 0.7; eyes strongly convergent ventrally. 2. Supra-antennal area without paired median lamellar projections below median ocellus; antenna with 45–47 flagellomeres. 3. Mesosoma elongate, about 1.7× as long as deep. 4. Lateral face of pronotum with posterodorsal area centrally smooth to weakly granulate with small scattered punctures dorsally and posteriorly, dorsal and posterior margins crenulate. 5. Mesopleuron centrally smooth, punctures 15–21 μm in diameter and separated by 1.0–2.0× their diameter (variation: punctures 9–15 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter). 6. Mesoscutum with lateral lobe granulate with shallow punctures separated by 0.3–1.0× their diameter; median lobe defined by shallow notauli extending to slightly beyond mesoscutal midpoint. 7. Ventral division of 10. N. atratus Cresson, holotype female; ANSP. metapleuron smooth, punctures about 15 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter (variation: punc- tures about 9 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter). 8. Propodeum smooth to weakly granulate, lateral margins usually with weak punctures separated by 0.3–0.5× their diameter; carinae absent except for PTC and sections of median longitudinal carinae between PTC and propodeal apex; area anterad PTC with numerous strong rugulae, longitudinal near PTC then becoming transverse, extending about 0.8 distance to anterior propodeal margin and laterally not extending almost to pleural carina (variation: rugulae sometimes absent except along midline). 9. MS1 slender, without weak dorsal convexity on petiole. 10. Thyridium present as elongate ovoid, granulate and of lighter color than surrounding tergite; connected to base of T2 by narrow ridge (as in Fig. 11). Color. Head black to fuscous, with apical 0.5 of mandible dark brown, clypeus rarely with 0.3 of apical margin dark brown; antenna dark brown to fuscous except for white (completely or partially) flagellomeres 15–20 (comprising 4–6 flagellomeres for any one individual). Mesosoma black/fuscous, occasionally with following brown: anterior margin of pronotum, extreme posteroventral corner of mesopleuron, tegula, extreme posterior margin of mesonotum, raised areas of metanotum, and extreme posterior margin of propodeum. Fore leg with coxa and trochanter dark brown, remainder of leg brown to yellowish-brown. Middle leg: coxa, trochanter, and trochantellus dark brown; femur and tibia dark brown to brown; basal 0.3–0.5 of tarsomere 1 sometimes yellowish-brown to brownish-white, remainder of tarsus dark brown. Hind leg: coxa, trochanter, and trochantellus dark brown; femur and tibia brown, tibia shading to dark brown on apical 0.2; tarsus with tarsomere 1 ranging from completely dark brown to having apical 0.3–0.6 yellowish-white; tarsomeres 2–3 yellowish-white; tarsomere 4 dark brown or yellowish-white; tarsomere 5 dark brown. Wings with membrane with weak brown tint, and veins brown to dark brown. Metasoma with MS1 dark brown; T2 dark brown except rarely with brownish-red apex and posterolateral corners; T3–4 light to deep brownish-red, rarely concolorous with T5–8; remainder of metasoma dark brown (including gonoforceps) except for narrow white posterior margins of T7–8. Measurements. Body 12.5–13.5 mm; fore wing 7.8–9.0 mm. Material. Holotype F: MEXICO, Oaxaca: Vista Hermosa (17° 37’ 59.0”N, 96° 20’ 31.6”W), 1450 m, 20.x.1962, H. & M. Townes (EMUS). Condition of holotype: intact. Paratypes. MEXICO, Chiapas: 1F, San Cristobal de las Casas, 7200 ft., 17.x.1962, B.V. Petersen (EMUS); 1M, Durango: 3 mi. east of El Salto, 8500 ft., 4.vii.1964, W.R.M. Mason (CNCI); Oaxaca: 1F, Vista Hermosa (17° 37’ 59.0”N, 96° 20’ 31.6”W), 1450 m, 17.x.1962, H. & M. Townes (EMUS); 2FF2MM, same data as preceding except 19.x.1962 (CNCI, EMUS); 2MM, same data as preceding except 20.x.1962 (EMUS). USA, Arizona: 1M, Cochise Co., 5 mi. west of Portal, Southwestern Research Station, 5400 ft., 13.ix.1965 (EMUS). Other specimens: MEXICO, Chiapas: 1M, San Cristobal de las Casas, 7200 ft., 17.x.1962, B.V. Petersen (EMUS). Comments. Nonnus spurius is strikingly similar to Nonnus atratus Cresson, 1874, which was described from a female specimen collected in Orizaba, Mexico by Adrien Louis Jean de. Sumichrast sometime between 1855 and 1873 (details on Sumichrast from Papavero & Ibáñez-Bernal, 2001). The resemblance is quite close with regard to color and general surface sculpture (Fig. 11 vs. Fig. 12). Several characters, however, lead us to believe it is a separate species: 1) it is 30–40% larger than N. spurius, with a body length of 17.3 mm and a wing length of 9.8 mm., 2) the thyridium is linear and relatively smaller than in spurius, depressed, has a small posterior pit, and is not connected by a ridge to the anterior margin of T2 (compare Fig. 12 to Fig. 11), 3) the MS1 is arched and more elongate (compare Fig. 10 to Fig. 6), and 4) vein 2/Cu of the hind wing is straight versus slightly apically curved in N. spurius. Nonnus niger (Brullé) is another black species, originally described from Brazil, with a putative range from Brazil to Panama (Townes & Townes, 1966). Krieger (1903) discussed the black Nonnus specimens in his personal collection. Apparently working solely from published descriptions, he assigned his two male specimens (from Peru and Bolivia) to Nonnus albitarsis (Brullé), now a junior synonym of N. niger (Townes & Townes, 1966). The six females, which he considered to ‘broadly agree’ with N. niger (“mit Atractodes niger Brullé in Bezug auf diese Merkmale im Grossen und Ganzen überein”) were from Bolivia, Brazil, Panama, and Peru. Unfortunately, we were not able to borrow the Brullé types from the Museum d’Histoire Naturelle. We did, however, have specimens compared by Henry Townes to the Brullé types. While acknowledging that ‘compared with type’ (CWT) specimens can have considerable drawbacks, the Townes N. niger CWT specimen (Brazil: Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia) is decidedly a different species than N. spurius: the angulation of the gena in dorsal view is quite different (Fig. 14 vs. Fig. 16); mesopleural sculpture is strongly granulate with punctures about 10 μm in diameter and separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter; propodeal rugosity is weak and confined to the central median region; size is noticeably larger (fore wing 13 mm long). It should be noted that N. atratus is quite different fro

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,628
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0620,046

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetInfectious Diseases and MycologyTravaux en français237 207