MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931101227 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3850194

Nonnus spurius Wahl & Bennett 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6931101227 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicInfectious Diseases and Mycology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumLobeOvipositorFibrous jointAntenna (radio)Fundus (uterus)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonnus spurius Wahl & Bennett, sp. nov. (Figs. 6–8, 11, 16) Diagnosis. Nonnus spurius can be distinguished from other North and Central American species of Nonnus by the combination of the following characters: eyes strongly convergent ventrally; female flagellar band symmetrical, not extending further on dorsal surface than on ventral surface; female body uniformly black/fuscous; female mesopleuron weakly granulate with distinct punctures separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter; ovipositor 2.2–2.4× as long as length of hind femur, straight with apical 0.3 slightly decurved; male supra-antennal area lacking median lamellar projections; male mesosoma black/fuscous, metasoma with T1, most of T2, and T5+ dark brown and T3–4 light to deep brownish-red. Description. Female. Structure. 1. Supraclypeal area centrally granulosopunctate, punctures shallow and separated by 0.2–0.3× their diameter; supraclypeal width just below antennal sockets: width just above clypeal suture = 1.0: 0.7; eyes strongly convergent ventrally. 2. Supra-antennal area without projections; antenna with 38–42 flagellomeres. 3. Mesosoma elongate (Figs. 6–8), about 1.7× as long as deep. 4. Lateral face of pronotum with posterodorsal area centrally weakly to moderately granulate with small scattered shallow punctures, dorsal and posterior margins crenulate. 5. Mesopleuron centrally granulate, punctures 15–21 μm in diameter and separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter. 6. Mesoscutum with lateral lobe granulate with shallow punctures separated by 0.3–1.0× their diameter; median lobe defined by shallow notauli extending to slightly beyond mesoscutal midpoint. 7. Ventral division of metapleuron weakly granulate, punctures about 15 μm in diameter and separated by 1.0–2.0× their di- ameter. 8. Propodeum granulate and impunctate; carinae absent except for PTC and sections of median longitudinal carinae between PTC and propodeal apex; area anterad PTC with numerous strong rugulae, longitudinal near PTC then becoming transverse, extending about 0.8 distance to anterior propodeal margin and laterally extending almost to pleural carina. 9. MS1 slender, usually with weak dorsal convexity on petiole (Fig. 6). 10. Thyridium ovoid, granulate and of lighter color than surrounding tergite, and connected to base of T2 by narrow ridge (Fig. 11). 11. Ovipositor 2.2–2.4× as long as length as hind femur, straight with apical 0.3 slightly decurved. Color. Head black to fuscous, with apical 0.5 of mandible dark brown; antenna dark brown to fuscous except for white dorsal surfaces of flagellomeres 1–4 (becoming progressively reduced until flagellomere 4 with only narrow short strip or rarely with strip absent) and white band on flagellomeres 10–17 (comprising 6–8 flagellomeres for any one individual; note band is symmetrical, not extending further on dorsal surface than on ventral). Mesosoma black/fuscous. Fore leg with coxa and trochanter dark brown except for brownish-white ventral trochanteral surface; remainder of leg brown. Middle and hind legs dark brown except for white hind tarsomeres 2-3, and occasional apical 0.2–0.4 of hind tarsomere 1. Wings with membrane with weak brown tint, and veins brown to dark brown. Metasoma dark brown except for narrow whitish-brown apex of T2, and white apical 0.3 of ovipositor sheath. Measurements. Body 10.0– 14.3 mm (11.0 mm); fore wing 7.0– 8.8 mm (7.4 mm). Male. Structure. 1. Supraclypeal area smooth and punctate, punctures deep and separated by 0.2–0.3× their diameter; supraclypeal width just below antennal sockets: width just above clypeal suture = 1.0: 0.7; eyes strongly convergent ventrally. 2. Supra-antennal area without paired median lamellar projections below median ocellus; antenna with 45–47 flagellomeres. 3. Mesosoma elongate, about 1.7× as long as deep. 4. Lateral face of pronotum with posterodorsal area centrally smooth to weakly granulate with small scattered punctures dorsally and posteriorly, dorsal and posterior margins crenulate. 5. Mesopleuron centrally smooth, punctures 15–21 μm in diameter and separated by 1.0–2.0× their diameter (variation: punctures 9–15 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter). 6. Mesoscutum with lateral lobe granulate with shallow punctures separated by 0.3–1.0× their diameter; median lobe defined by shallow notauli extending to slightly beyond mesoscutal midpoint. 7. Ventral division of 10. N. atratus Cresson, holotype female; ANSP. metapleuron smooth, punctures about 15 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter (variation: punc- tures about 9 μm in diameter and separated by 2.0–3.0× their diameter). 8. Propodeum smooth to weakly granulate, lateral margins usually with weak punctures separated by 0.3–0.5× their diameter; carinae absent except for PTC and sections of median longitudinal carinae between PTC and propodeal apex; area anterad PTC with numerous strong rugulae, longitudinal near PTC then becoming transverse, extending about 0.8 distance to anterior propodeal margin and laterally not extending almost to pleural carina (variation: rugulae sometimes absent except along midline). 9. MS1 slender, without weak dorsal convexity on petiole. 10. Thyridium present as elongate ovoid, granulate and of lighter color than surrounding tergite; connected to base of T2 by narrow ridge (as in Fig. 11). Color. Head black to fuscous, with apical 0.5 of mandible dark brown, clypeus rarely with 0.3 of apical margin dark brown; antenna dark brown to fuscous except for white (completely or partially) flagellomeres 15–20 (comprising 4–6 flagellomeres for any one individual). Mesosoma black/fuscous, occasionally with following brown: anterior margin of pronotum, extreme posteroventral corner of mesopleuron, tegula, extreme posterior margin of mesonotum, raised areas of metanotum, and extreme posterior margin of propodeum. Fore leg with coxa and trochanter dark brown, remainder of leg brown to yellowish-brown. Middle leg: coxa, trochanter, and trochantellus dark brown; femur and tibia dark brown to brown; basal 0.3–0.5 of tarsomere 1 sometimes yellowish-brown to brownish-white, remainder of tarsus dark brown. Hind leg: coxa, trochanter, and trochantellus dark brown; femur and tibia brown, tibia shading to dark brown on apical 0.2; tarsus with tarsomere 1 ranging from completely dark brown to having apical 0.3–0.6 yellowish-white; tarsomeres 2–3 yellowish-white; tarsomere 4 dark brown or yellowish-white; tarsomere 5 dark brown. Wings with membrane with weak brown tint, and veins brown to dark brown. Metasoma with MS1 dark brown; T2 dark brown except rarely with brownish-red apex and posterolateral corners; T3–4 light to deep brownish-red, rarely concolorous with T5–8; remainder of metasoma dark brown (including gonoforceps) except for narrow white posterior margins of T7–8. Measurements. Body 12.5–13.5 mm; fore wing 7.8–9.0 mm. Material. Holotype F: MEXICO, Oaxaca: Vista Hermosa (17° 37’ 59.0”N, 96° 20’ 31.6”W), 1450 m, 20.x.1962, H. & M. Townes (EMUS). Condition of holotype: intact. Paratypes. MEXICO, Chiapas: 1F, San Cristobal de las Casas, 7200 ft., 17.x.1962, B.V. Petersen (EMUS); 1M, Durango: 3 mi. east of El Salto, 8500 ft., 4.vii.1964, W.R.M. Mason (CNCI); Oaxaca: 1F, Vista Hermosa (17° 37’ 59.0”N, 96° 20’ 31.6”W), 1450 m, 17.x.1962, H. & M. Townes (EMUS); 2FF2MM, same data as preceding except 19.x.1962 (CNCI, EMUS); 2MM, same data as preceding except 20.x.1962 (EMUS). USA, Arizona: 1M, Cochise Co., 5 mi. west of Portal, Southwestern Research Station, 5400 ft., 13.ix.1965 (EMUS). Other specimens: MEXICO, Chiapas: 1M, San Cristobal de las Casas, 7200 ft., 17.x.1962, B.V. Petersen (EMUS). Comments. Nonnus spurius is strikingly similar to Nonnus atratus Cresson, 1874, which was described from a female specimen collected in Orizaba, Mexico by Adrien Louis Jean de. Sumichrast sometime between 1855 and 1873 (details on Sumichrast from Papavero & Ibáñez-Bernal, 2001). The resemblance is quite close with regard to color and general surface sculpture (Fig. 11 vs. Fig. 12). Several characters, however, lead us to believe it is a separate species: 1) it is 30–40% larger than N. spurius, with a body length of 17.3 mm and a wing length of 9.8 mm., 2) the thyridium is linear and relatively smaller than in spurius, depressed, has a small posterior pit, and is not connected by a ridge to the anterior margin of T2 (compare Fig. 12 to Fig. 11), 3) the MS1 is arched and more elongate (compare Fig. 10 to Fig. 6), and 4) vein 2/Cu of the hind wing is straight versus slightly apically curved in N. spurius. Nonnus niger (Brullé) is another black species, originally described from Brazil, with a putative range from Brazil to Panama (Townes & Townes, 1966). Krieger (1903) discussed the black Nonnus specimens in his personal collection. Apparently working solely from published descriptions, he assigned his two male specimens (from Peru and Bolivia) to Nonnus albitarsis (Brullé), now a junior synonym of N. niger (Townes & Townes, 1966). The six females, which he considered to ‘broadly agree’ with N. niger (“mit Atractodes niger Brullé in Bezug auf diese Merkmale im Grossen und Ganzen überein”) were from Bolivia, Brazil, Panama, and Peru. Unfortunately, we were not able to borrow the Brullé types from the Museum d’Histoire Naturelle. We did, however, have specimens compared by Henry Townes to the Brullé types. While acknowledging that ‘compared with type’ (CWT) specimens can have considerable drawbacks, the Townes N. niger CWT specimen (Brazil: Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia) is decidedly a different species than N. spurius: the angulation of the gena in dorsal view is quite different (Fig. 14 vs. Fig. 16); mesopleural sculpture is strongly granulate with punctures about 10 μm in diameter and separated by 0.5–1.0× their diameter; propodeal rugosity is weak and confined to the central median region; size is noticeably larger (fore wing 13 mm long). It should be noted that N. atratus is quite different fro

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInfectious Diseases and MycologyFrench-language works237,207