MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6931255186 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4410961

Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid. The 1970

2020· article· en· W6931255186 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueDigital Platforms and Economics
Établissements canadiensCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuadrate boneHolotypeScutellumApex (geometry)Dorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid (Figs 2, 3B, 4E, 5E, 6D, 7D, 8, 9C,D) Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid, 1970: 501. Other references: Arnaud, 1977: 284 (distribution); Cooper, 1991: 79 (CNC type catalogue); Sinclair, 1992: 492 (male terminalia studied); Theischinger, 1986: 316 (phylogenetic discussion). Austrothaumalea spatula Schmid: Sinclair 2008b: 12 (lapsis calami, fusca species group). Type material examined. Holotype: ♂, minuten pinned, with abdomen mounted in resin below specimen, labelled: “ Estero la Jaula / Curico, CHILE / I.1964, L. Pena / Nothofagus”; “ HOLOTYPE / CNCNo. 11,305/ Thaumalea spatulata Schm. [red label]”; “ CNC/ 803775 ” [genitalia dissected, slide mounted below] (CNC). Allotype: ♀, same label data as holotype, except, CNC 803775 (CNC). Paratypes: CHILE: Region VI (O’Higgins): Bosque de los Conservadores Graneros, 1–4-III-62, 1100 m, Pena, CNC #11.035 (1♂, 1♀, CNC). Recognition. The quadrate apex of its parameres and the quadrate posterior margin of the gonocoxal plate are key characteristics for recognizing this species. It lacks the posterior epandrial projections found in A. apicalis. Redescription. Male. n = 8. Length 1.8–2.2 mm. Colouration (Fig. 3B). Head dull, dark brown; pronotum, postpronotum, postpronotal lobe and lateral margins of prescutum brown; prescutum and mesoscutum shiny, primarily yellow, with pleura and posterior margin of mesoscutum brown with posterior brown rectangle, anterior corners of rectangle extended into two longitudinal brown vittae connecting, or nearly so, to posterior vittae extending from hind margins or prescutal dark patches; scutellum shiny, dorsal aspect brown with lateral yellowish brown patches, ventral aspect yellow; mediotergite shiny, brown; katepisternum yellow near coxa then turning brown, remaining pteropleuron yellowish brown to brown; posterior basalare yellowish brown; halter brown; legs pale brown, tarsi darker; abdomen dark brown, hind margins of tergites whitish; terminalia dark brown, gonostyli light brown. Head. Eyes above antennae broadly joined, barely exposing frons above antennae. Flagellomeres 1–3 expanded, subquadrate; 1 as long as 2 and 3 combined; flagellomeres 4–10 thin, cylindrical, becoming progressively more elongate. Vertex clothed in golden setae of uniform length, with sparse long, black orbital setae. Thorax. Pronotal setae longer than scutal setae. Scutum clothed dorsally in short, golden setulae; notopleural, supra-alar and postsutural setae long, black. Pteropleuron bare. Fore- and mid legs with tarsi simple, hind leg with tarsomere 4 bilobed. Wing (Fig. 2). Wing length: 2.8–3.3 mm. Lightly infuscate throughout, slightly darker where R 4+5 meets apex; apex rounded; C and posterior wing margin with fringe of microtrichia; Sc incomplete; R 1 and R 1 (+R 2+3) without weakenings or depigmented gaps; R 1 (+R 2+3) with uniseriate row of microtrichia along entire length, remaining veins bare; R flexed into cell br; R 2+3 crossvein very weak or absent, at most a faint infuscation, situated slightly beyond midpoint of R 1 (+R 2+3); bend in R 4+5 well-defined; R 4+5 and M 1 running parallel toward margin; M 1 and M 2 straight; M 4 slightly sinuous; CuA with basal spur shorter than crossvein m-cu, may be distinct or indistinct. Abdomen. Abdominal sternite 1 narrow, spectacle-shaped; sternite 2 with slender median sclerite and lightly sclerotized posterior rectangle, a few setae on posterior margin; sternites 3–7 rectangular, weakly sclerotized, setae restricted to posterior half and laterad; anterior margin of sternites 5–7 thin, well sclerotized; sternite 8 crescentshaped, bare, anterior margin well-sclerotized, arched slightly into preceding sternite. Terminalia (Figs 4E, 5E). Epandrium trapezoidal from ventral aspect; apical third slightly tapered; posterior margin broad and rounded; lacking pointed posterolateral processes. Hypandrium broad in ventral view, nearly subequal to basal width of gonostylus; anterior margin slightly concave. Gonocoxite broadest medially, tapered toward apex. Gonostylus about two-thirds length of gonocoxite, curved gently throughout; broadest basally, gradually tapered with small tooth at apex. Parameres distally fused, slightly more than half-length of epandrium, spatula-like, broadest apically. Gonocoxal plate rectangular, short, about half-length of gonocoxite; broad basally; apical margin truncate; basally not fused to hypandrium. Cercus weakly sclerotized, situated medially. Female. n = 2. Similar to male except as follows: Length: 2.5–2.7 mm. Abdomen: Tergites 7–9 noticeably more sclerotized than preceding tergites; only anterior margin of sternite 7 well-sclerotized. Terminalia (Figs 6D, 7D): Hypogynial valve projected slightly beyond tergite 9; posterior margin with rounded cleft in ventral view, forming two truncate lobes; densely setose. Tergite 9 subquadrate in lateral view, wider than tergite 8, without lateral projections. Sternite 9 (genital fork) slender, weakly sclerotized, with two rod-shaped sclerites anteriorly and two triangular sclerites next to hypogynial valve; lateral arms extended past hypogynial valve, arms closely approximated along midline, thin anteriorly, distal half expanded. Hypoproct thin, divided into pair of sclerites. Cercus rounded, projected posteriorly; bearing numerous setae. Spermathecal ducts not observed. Immature Stages. Unknown. Additional Material Examined. CHILE: Region VI (O’Higgins): Rte. I-45, 16-XII-2016, 34°46′29.2″S 70°40′03.9″W, elev. 827 m, stream, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (1♂); Region VII (Maule): Los Queñes, Rte. J-25, 6-XII-2016, 34°59′48.8″S 70°48′37.0″W, elev. 684 m, seep, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (4♂, 1♀ *); Region VIII (Bío Bío): Rte. Q-689, 8-XII-2016, 37°54′55.6″S 71°35′43.2″W, elev. 552 m, cascading creek, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (1♂, 1♀ *). Distribution. Known from the Andes of central Chile (Figs 8, 9C,D). Remarks. The O’Higgins specimen collected by the authors differs somewhat in appearance from the other specimens in that the posterior margin of the epandrium is slightly concave. Molecular fingerprinting matches that of other A. spatulata specimens. This is the northern-most locality for this species and likely indicates population variation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,762
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,039

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,148 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDigital Platforms and EconomicsTravaux en français237 207