MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931255186 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4410961

Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid. The 1970

2020· article· en· W6931255186 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrate boneHolotypeScutellumApex (geometry)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid (Figs 2, 3B, 4E, 5E, 6D, 7D, 8, 9C,D) Austrothaumalea spatulata Schmid, 1970: 501. Other references: Arnaud, 1977: 284 (distribution); Cooper, 1991: 79 (CNC type catalogue); Sinclair, 1992: 492 (male terminalia studied); Theischinger, 1986: 316 (phylogenetic discussion). Austrothaumalea spatula Schmid: Sinclair 2008b: 12 (lapsis calami, fusca species group). Type material examined. Holotype: ♂, minuten pinned, with abdomen mounted in resin below specimen, labelled: “ Estero la Jaula / Curico, CHILE / I.1964, L. Pena / Nothofagus”; “ HOLOTYPE / CNCNo. 11,305/ Thaumalea spatulata Schm. [red label]”; “ CNC/ 803775 ” [genitalia dissected, slide mounted below] (CNC). Allotype: ♀, same label data as holotype, except, CNC 803775 (CNC). Paratypes: CHILE: Region VI (O’Higgins): Bosque de los Conservadores Graneros, 1–4-III-62, 1100 m, Pena, CNC #11.035 (1♂, 1♀, CNC). Recognition. The quadrate apex of its parameres and the quadrate posterior margin of the gonocoxal plate are key characteristics for recognizing this species. It lacks the posterior epandrial projections found in A. apicalis. Redescription. Male. n = 8. Length 1.8–2.2 mm. Colouration (Fig. 3B). Head dull, dark brown; pronotum, postpronotum, postpronotal lobe and lateral margins of prescutum brown; prescutum and mesoscutum shiny, primarily yellow, with pleura and posterior margin of mesoscutum brown with posterior brown rectangle, anterior corners of rectangle extended into two longitudinal brown vittae connecting, or nearly so, to posterior vittae extending from hind margins or prescutal dark patches; scutellum shiny, dorsal aspect brown with lateral yellowish brown patches, ventral aspect yellow; mediotergite shiny, brown; katepisternum yellow near coxa then turning brown, remaining pteropleuron yellowish brown to brown; posterior basalare yellowish brown; halter brown; legs pale brown, tarsi darker; abdomen dark brown, hind margins of tergites whitish; terminalia dark brown, gonostyli light brown. Head. Eyes above antennae broadly joined, barely exposing frons above antennae. Flagellomeres 1–3 expanded, subquadrate; 1 as long as 2 and 3 combined; flagellomeres 4–10 thin, cylindrical, becoming progressively more elongate. Vertex clothed in golden setae of uniform length, with sparse long, black orbital setae. Thorax. Pronotal setae longer than scutal setae. Scutum clothed dorsally in short, golden setulae; notopleural, supra-alar and postsutural setae long, black. Pteropleuron bare. Fore- and mid legs with tarsi simple, hind leg with tarsomere 4 bilobed. Wing (Fig. 2). Wing length: 2.8–3.3 mm. Lightly infuscate throughout, slightly darker where R 4+5 meets apex; apex rounded; C and posterior wing margin with fringe of microtrichia; Sc incomplete; R 1 and R 1 (+R 2+3) without weakenings or depigmented gaps; R 1 (+R 2+3) with uniseriate row of microtrichia along entire length, remaining veins bare; R flexed into cell br; R 2+3 crossvein very weak or absent, at most a faint infuscation, situated slightly beyond midpoint of R 1 (+R 2+3); bend in R 4+5 well-defined; R 4+5 and M 1 running parallel toward margin; M 1 and M 2 straight; M 4 slightly sinuous; CuA with basal spur shorter than crossvein m-cu, may be distinct or indistinct. Abdomen. Abdominal sternite 1 narrow, spectacle-shaped; sternite 2 with slender median sclerite and lightly sclerotized posterior rectangle, a few setae on posterior margin; sternites 3–7 rectangular, weakly sclerotized, setae restricted to posterior half and laterad; anterior margin of sternites 5–7 thin, well sclerotized; sternite 8 crescentshaped, bare, anterior margin well-sclerotized, arched slightly into preceding sternite. Terminalia (Figs 4E, 5E). Epandrium trapezoidal from ventral aspect; apical third slightly tapered; posterior margin broad and rounded; lacking pointed posterolateral processes. Hypandrium broad in ventral view, nearly subequal to basal width of gonostylus; anterior margin slightly concave. Gonocoxite broadest medially, tapered toward apex. Gonostylus about two-thirds length of gonocoxite, curved gently throughout; broadest basally, gradually tapered with small tooth at apex. Parameres distally fused, slightly more than half-length of epandrium, spatula-like, broadest apically. Gonocoxal plate rectangular, short, about half-length of gonocoxite; broad basally; apical margin truncate; basally not fused to hypandrium. Cercus weakly sclerotized, situated medially. Female. n = 2. Similar to male except as follows: Length: 2.5–2.7 mm. Abdomen: Tergites 7–9 noticeably more sclerotized than preceding tergites; only anterior margin of sternite 7 well-sclerotized. Terminalia (Figs 6D, 7D): Hypogynial valve projected slightly beyond tergite 9; posterior margin with rounded cleft in ventral view, forming two truncate lobes; densely setose. Tergite 9 subquadrate in lateral view, wider than tergite 8, without lateral projections. Sternite 9 (genital fork) slender, weakly sclerotized, with two rod-shaped sclerites anteriorly and two triangular sclerites next to hypogynial valve; lateral arms extended past hypogynial valve, arms closely approximated along midline, thin anteriorly, distal half expanded. Hypoproct thin, divided into pair of sclerites. Cercus rounded, projected posteriorly; bearing numerous setae. Spermathecal ducts not observed. Immature Stages. Unknown. Additional Material Examined. CHILE: Region VI (O’Higgins): Rte. I-45, 16-XII-2016, 34°46′29.2″S 70°40′03.9″W, elev. 827 m, stream, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (1♂); Region VII (Maule): Los Queñes, Rte. J-25, 6-XII-2016, 34°59′48.8″S 70°48′37.0″W, elev. 684 m, seep, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (4♂, 1♀ *); Region VIII (Bío Bío): Rte. Q-689, 8-XII-2016, 37°54′55.6″S 71°35′43.2″W, elev. 552 m, cascading creek, J.K. Moulton & R. J. Pivar (1♂, 1♀ *). Distribution. Known from the Andes of central Chile (Figs 8, 9C,D). Remarks. The O’Higgins specimen collected by the authors differs somewhat in appearance from the other specimens in that the posterior margin of the epandrium is slightly concave. Molecular fingerprinting matches that of other A. spatulata specimens. This is the northern-most locality for this species and likely indicates population variation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207