Spilomicrus lubomasneri Chemyreva, 2015, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Spilomicrus lubomasneri sp. nov. (Figs 17–25) Diagnosis. Spilomicrus lubomasneri sp. nov. easy differs from the all known Palaearctic species by having the well impressed and full notauli, broad occipital flange, lateral pronotal area divided ventrally by broad groove (Fig. 17) and frons above toruli with two deep pits divided by a keel (Fig. 24). This species is similar to S. notaulus sp. nov., but it differs from it by characters indicated in the key (see couplet 2) and three additional following features: notauli not connected with transscutal line by groove (Fig. 6) (connected in S. notaulus), acetabular carina weakly shifted posteriorly in its median part (Fig. 25) (strongly shifted in S. notaulus (Fig. 26)) and pronotal cervical area not separated by ridge from lateral area (separated by ridge in S. notaulus (Figs 1, 4)) Description. Holotype. Female (Figs 17–20, 22–25). Body length 3.6 mm; fore wing length 2.6 mm; antenna length 2.2 mm. Colour. Body mainly black; tegula, legs, distal part of A1 and antennal segments A2–A7 reddish brown; A8– A13 dark brown; mandible black; palpi pale brown. Head. Head in dorsal view distinctly transverse (30:22), narrower than width of mesosoma (30:33), with antennal shelf prominent (Figs 17, 24); in lateral view shorter than high (22:27). Frons, genae and vertex with sparse delicate punctures, face without punctation. Tentorial pit absent. Malar sulcus complete and deep. Clypeus transverse (4:5), semicircular, weakly convex. Epistomal sulcus distinct. Ratio of pleurostomal distance to width of head 16:29. Mandible long, bidentate, teeth subequal. Eye height shorter than half head height (13:30) and longer than malar space (13:9); eye large, with long sparse setae, not surrounded by grooves. Ocelli large (Fig. 24); LOL 1.5 times diameter of anterior ocellus; POL longer than OOL (8:5). Occipital flange broad, smooth, without long setae. Postgenal cushion not dense (Figs 17–18). Antenna. A1 cylindrical, covered with dense pale setae, with two projecting lamellae apically overlapping base of A2. A2 compressed, in lateral view rectangular (7:9); in dorsal view basally attenuate and broadened apically. Antenna with non-abrupt clava, A8–A13 with MGS brush and flattened on ventral side. In lateral view, connection between A8–A13 situated dorsally. A13 distinctly narrower than A12 and with ventral tip. In dorsal view, antennal segment length/width: A1 38:8; A2 9:6.5; A3 11:6; A4 10:6; A5 9:6; A6 8:6; A7 8:7; A8 9:8; A9 9:9; A10 9:10; A11 9:10; A12 9:10; A13 10:8. Mesosoma. Mesosoma in lateral view longer than high (50:27); in dorsal view, longer than wide (50:33). Neck bare, with deep longitudinal grooves. Pronotum with shoulders prominent and rounded, with median area perpendicular to mesoscutum, not separated by ridge from lateral area. Lateral pronotal area divided ventrally by broad groove. Pronotal cushion dense. Anterior incision of mesopleuron large (Fig. 17). Propleuron with short silvery pubescent, without reticulation. Mesopleuron smooth and bare laterally and pubescent ventrally, with horizontal depression above sternaulus; the sternaulus present as sharp keel extending from anterior incision of mesopleuron to posterior margin of mesopleuron. Acetabular carina prominent, sharp and shifted posteriorly in its median part (Fig. 25). Postacetabular sulcus absent. Mesopleural epicoxal carina present only laterally; mesopleural epicoxal sulcus and carina on ventral side absent. Mesonotum wider than long (40:32). Notauli complete, broad, deep posteriorly and shallow anteriorly. Humeral sulcus distinct, broad and long. Scutellum flattened and with two large circular anterior scutellar pits (Fig. 18). Axilla with large broad grooves along posterior margin. Axillar depression pubescent. Lateral scutellar pit strongly enlarged, broad and long. Posterior scutellar pits large and deep (Fig. 18). Metascutellum coarsely rugose, sparsely pubescent, with projecting median and one lateral keel. Propodeum in dorsal view with posterior margin arcuate, entirely coarsely rugose, without dense pilosity; median propodeal keel projecting as long spine directed upward. Legs long and slender. All legs with trochantellus. Wings. Fore wing clear, longer than wide (51:21). Marginal vein 2.0 times as long as wide. Stigmal vein shorter than width of marginal vein. Costal and submarginal veins tubular; costal vein not pigmented. Submarginal vein sclerotized. Basal vein nebulous. Metasoma. Petiole cylindrical, elongate (22:8), with deep longitudinal grooves and long erect setae on lateral and ventral sides; on dorsal side, longitudinal grooves and erect setae present on anterior 3/4 of petiole length, posterior part of petiole with short recumbent pilosity. Petiole length/mesosoma length 12:25. T2 with short sparse setae and micropunctures posteromedially. T3–T5 with dense punctation and one row of long setae, the setae denser on lateral areas of tergites. T5 expanded laterally and with numerous setae at sides. T6 small, T7 pointed. S2 smooth, with dense cushion at anterior margin and with scattered setae posteriorly. S3–S5 with dense punctation and one row of long setae. Apical sternite entire with coarse and dense punctation, and with short setae apically. Male (Fig. 21). Body length 2.9–3.2 mm. Similar to female, but differs by features of antennal structures and petiole. Antenna not longer than body, filiform; A3–A13 reddish, reddish brown or dark brown, A2 and apical part of A1 red, basal part of A1 black. A1 with small lamellae. A2 truncate in lateral view. A4 weakly excavated, and with keel extending little beyond middle of segment. Antennal segment length/width: A1 17:4.5; A2 4:4; A3 12:5; A4 13:5; A5 11,5:4.5; A6 11:4.5; A7 10:4.5; A8 9:4; A9 9:4; A10 9:4; A11 9:4; A12 8:3; A13 11:3. Petiole length/ mesosoma length 5:2. Host. Unknown Etymology. Named in honor of Dr Lubomir Masner, a well-known Canadian hymenopterist, and expert on Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea. Type material. Holotype: ♀ (ZISP), labelled “ Russia, Primorskiy Terr., near Ussuriysk 1.VIII.1993, S. Belokobylskij leg.”, “ Holotype. Spilomicrus lubomasneri Chemyreva det. 2014”. Paratypes. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr., same label as in holotype (1♀ ZISP); Ussuriysk District, 20–23. VII.1972, M. Kozlov, (1♂, ZISP); Ussuriysk District, Gornotayozhnoye, 43 ᵒ 66 ′ N, 132 ᵒ 25 ′ E, 11–12.IX.1999, M. Michailovskaya (2♀, CNCI); Laso Nature Reserve, 11–17. VII.1993, A. Khalaim (1♂, ZISP); same locality, 22– 24. VII.1993 and 25–26. VIII.2006, S. Belokobylskij (3♀, 5♂, ZISP, CNCI, BMNH); same locality, 5–25. VII.2005, K. Makarov, (2♂, ZISP); near Nezhino, 16–18. VII.1993, S. Belokobylskij (2♂, ZISP).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,034 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».