MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931377021 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6110475

Spilomicrus lubomasneri Chemyreva, 2015, sp. nov.

2015· article· en· W6931377021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicMedicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulcusRidgeMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Groove (engineering)DorsumKeelAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spilomicrus lubomasneri sp. nov. (Figs 17–25) Diagnosis. Spilomicrus lubomasneri sp. nov. easy differs from the all known Palaearctic species by having the well impressed and full notauli, broad occipital flange, lateral pronotal area divided ventrally by broad groove (Fig. 17) and frons above toruli with two deep pits divided by a keel (Fig. 24). This species is similar to S. notaulus sp. nov., but it differs from it by characters indicated in the key (see couplet 2) and three additional following features: notauli not connected with transscutal line by groove (Fig. 6) (connected in S. notaulus), acetabular carina weakly shifted posteriorly in its median part (Fig. 25) (strongly shifted in S. notaulus (Fig. 26)) and pronotal cervical area not separated by ridge from lateral area (separated by ridge in S. notaulus (Figs 1, 4)) Description. Holotype. Female (Figs 17–20, 22–25). Body length 3.6 mm; fore wing length 2.6 mm; antenna length 2.2 mm. Colour. Body mainly black; tegula, legs, distal part of A1 and antennal segments A2–A7 reddish brown; A8– A13 dark brown; mandible black; palpi pale brown. Head. Head in dorsal view distinctly transverse (30:22), narrower than width of mesosoma (30:33), with antennal shelf prominent (Figs 17, 24); in lateral view shorter than high (22:27). Frons, genae and vertex with sparse delicate punctures, face without punctation. Tentorial pit absent. Malar sulcus complete and deep. Clypeus transverse (4:5), semicircular, weakly convex. Epistomal sulcus distinct. Ratio of pleurostomal distance to width of head 16:29. Mandible long, bidentate, teeth subequal. Eye height shorter than half head height (13:30) and longer than malar space (13:9); eye large, with long sparse setae, not surrounded by grooves. Ocelli large (Fig. 24); LOL 1.5 times diameter of anterior ocellus; POL longer than OOL (8:5). Occipital flange broad, smooth, without long setae. Postgenal cushion not dense (Figs 17–18). Antenna. A1 cylindrical, covered with dense pale setae, with two projecting lamellae apically overlapping base of A2. A2 compressed, in lateral view rectangular (7:9); in dorsal view basally attenuate and broadened apically. Antenna with non-abrupt clava, A8–A13 with MGS brush and flattened on ventral side. In lateral view, connection between A8–A13 situated dorsally. A13 distinctly narrower than A12 and with ventral tip. In dorsal view, antennal segment length/width: A1 38:8; A2 9:6.5; A3 11:6; A4 10:6; A5 9:6; A6 8:6; A7 8:7; A8 9:8; A9 9:9; A10 9:10; A11 9:10; A12 9:10; A13 10:8. Mesosoma. Mesosoma in lateral view longer than high (50:27); in dorsal view, longer than wide (50:33). Neck bare, with deep longitudinal grooves. Pronotum with shoulders prominent and rounded, with median area perpendicular to mesoscutum, not separated by ridge from lateral area. Lateral pronotal area divided ventrally by broad groove. Pronotal cushion dense. Anterior incision of mesopleuron large (Fig. 17). Propleuron with short silvery pubescent, without reticulation. Mesopleuron smooth and bare laterally and pubescent ventrally, with horizontal depression above sternaulus; the sternaulus present as sharp keel extending from anterior incision of mesopleuron to posterior margin of mesopleuron. Acetabular carina prominent, sharp and shifted posteriorly in its median part (Fig. 25). Postacetabular sulcus absent. Mesopleural epicoxal carina present only laterally; mesopleural epicoxal sulcus and carina on ventral side absent. Mesonotum wider than long (40:32). Notauli complete, broad, deep posteriorly and shallow anteriorly. Humeral sulcus distinct, broad and long. Scutellum flattened and with two large circular anterior scutellar pits (Fig. 18). Axilla with large broad grooves along posterior margin. Axillar depression pubescent. Lateral scutellar pit strongly enlarged, broad and long. Posterior scutellar pits large and deep (Fig. 18). Metascutellum coarsely rugose, sparsely pubescent, with projecting median and one lateral keel. Propodeum in dorsal view with posterior margin arcuate, entirely coarsely rugose, without dense pilosity; median propodeal keel projecting as long spine directed upward. Legs long and slender. All legs with trochantellus. Wings. Fore wing clear, longer than wide (51:21). Marginal vein 2.0 times as long as wide. Stigmal vein shorter than width of marginal vein. Costal and submarginal veins tubular; costal vein not pigmented. Submarginal vein sclerotized. Basal vein nebulous. Metasoma. Petiole cylindrical, elongate (22:8), with deep longitudinal grooves and long erect setae on lateral and ventral sides; on dorsal side, longitudinal grooves and erect setae present on anterior 3/4 of petiole length, posterior part of petiole with short recumbent pilosity. Petiole length/mesosoma length 12:25. T2 with short sparse setae and micropunctures posteromedially. T3–T5 with dense punctation and one row of long setae, the setae denser on lateral areas of tergites. T5 expanded laterally and with numerous setae at sides. T6 small, T7 pointed. S2 smooth, with dense cushion at anterior margin and with scattered setae posteriorly. S3–S5 with dense punctation and one row of long setae. Apical sternite entire with coarse and dense punctation, and with short setae apically. Male (Fig. 21). Body length 2.9–3.2 mm. Similar to female, but differs by features of antennal structures and petiole. Antenna not longer than body, filiform; A3–A13 reddish, reddish brown or dark brown, A2 and apical part of A1 red, basal part of A1 black. A1 with small lamellae. A2 truncate in lateral view. A4 weakly excavated, and with keel extending little beyond middle of segment. Antennal segment length/width: A1 17:4.5; A2 4:4; A3 12:5; A4 13:5; A5 11,5:4.5; A6 11:4.5; A7 10:4.5; A8 9:4; A9 9:4; A10 9:4; A11 9:4; A12 8:3; A13 11:3. Petiole length/ mesosoma length 5:2. Host. Unknown Etymology. Named in honor of Dr Lubomir Masner, a well-known Canadian hymenopterist, and expert on Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea. Type material. Holotype: ♀ (ZISP), labelled “ Russia, Primorskiy Terr., near Ussuriysk 1.VIII.1993, S. Belokobylskij leg.”, “ Holotype. Spilomicrus lubomasneri Chemyreva det. 2014”. Paratypes. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr., same label as in holotype (1♀ ZISP); Ussuriysk District, 20–23. VII.1972, M. Kozlov, (1♂, ZISP); Ussuriysk District, Gornotayozhnoye, 43 ᵒ 66 ′ N, 132 ᵒ 25 ′ E, 11–12.IX.1999, M. Michailovskaya (2♀, CNCI); Laso Nature Reserve, 11–17. VII.1993, A. Khalaim (1♂, ZISP); same locality, 22– 24. VII.1993 and 25–26. VIII.2006, S. Belokobylskij (3♀, 5♂, ZISP, CNCI, BMNH); same locality, 5–25. VII.2005, K. Makarov, (2♂, ZISP); near Nezhino, 16–18. VII.1993, S. Belokobylskij (2♂, ZISP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.228
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMedicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207