Archaeological desk-based assessment and rapid buildings appraisal of the former Stanley Tools, Rutland Road, ShefÏeld
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In April 2006, ARCUS were commissioned by ECUS Ltd to undertake a desk-based assessment of land off Rutland Road, ShefÏeld, South Yorkshire (SK 352 889). The assessment included a site visit, along with documentary and cartographic research. The report was revised in February 2007 to include the remaining areas and buildings within the site. The aims of the desk-based assessment were to establish the archaeological and historical background of the site, and to assess the potential for the survival of subsurface archaeological features. The impact of the development proposals on buried archaeological deposits was also noted. The present-day Woodside Lane had been constructed by 1631. However, there is no evidence relating directly to the proposal area itself prior to 1795, when the site contained a mix of cultivated and uncultivated land. Sub-rectangular structures shown within the northern part of Area A at that time are likely to have been the three-storey, terraced properties that remained extant at this location until their demolition in 1960. Terraced structures shown to the rear in 1808 appear to have been replaced by further domestic buildings on the same alignment by 1889. These were also demolished during the mid-20th century. Allotments, gardens and associated features such as wells, troughs, pumps and a summerhouse shown within the site in 1853 were removed when urbanisation occurred throughout the area during the third quarter of the 19 th century. By 1889 the site was dominated by domestic, retail, industrial and religious premises, many of which remained extant until the third quarter of the 20th century Within Area B, the former Chapmans Industry Tool Works remains partially extant but is incorporated into later structures and appears to retain few historic features. Substantial excavation during the construction of these blocks, along with Buildings 1, 2, 3 and 4 within Area C, is likely to have removed any archaeological deposits within these areas. Buildings 1, 2 and 3 represent the Art Deco house-style adopted by Stanley Tools during the second third of the 20 th century and may be worthy of recording via a programme of archaeological photography. Areas D and E were developed between 1853 and 1889, with Birley Street and a number of domestic and retail premises having been constructed by 1879. The majority of buildings within Areas D and E remained extant until the demolition programmes of 1959 and 1960. In common with Area A, these locations have remained largely undeveloped and subsurface archaeological deposits and features relating to the sites 18th- and 19th-century structures may be preserved in situ. Further archaeological evaluation may be required in order to assess the extent of survival of subsurface archaeological features and deposits within Areas A, D and E.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».