Nagata et al. Supplementary Figure S1
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Supplemental Figure S1. Representative images of inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressing (iNOS+) cells on postinjury day 5. A-B: Images were obtained from the damaged muscle in the icing group. A: A transverse section of injured muscle was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for iNOS, counterstained with hematoxylin. Black arrowheads indicate iNOS+ regenerating muscle cells with central nuclei. B: A transverse section of injured muscle was analyzed by immunofluorescence for CD68 (green) and iNOS (red). Nuclei were stained with 4′-6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue). Arrows indicate macrophages identified as positive color of CD68 surrounding a nucleus (blue). White arrowheads indicate iNOS+ cells excluding macrophages identified as single positive color of iNOS surrounding a nucleus (blue). Scale bars = 30 μm. Method for (A): Immunohistochemical staining was performed on the cross section of injured extensor digitorum longus muscle. Cryosection was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked and permeabilized with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum at room temperature for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibody: rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS antibody (1:50, ab3523, lot# GR3382908-1; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; RRID: AB_303872) was diluted in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum. After washing the section three times in PBS, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3 % hydrogen peroxide diluted in methanol for 30 min at room temperature. The section was then washed three times in PBS and was incubated with MAX-PO (R) (Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) secondary antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the section was placed in the 3,3′-diaminobenzidine reaction solution, counterstained with hematoxylin. The sample was viewed on an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with objectives and image was taken with a digital camera (DP20; Olympus). Method for (B): Immunofluorescence was performed on the cross section of injured extensor digitorum longus muscle. Cryosection was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS, blocked and permeabilized with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum and 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight or at room temperature for 1 h. The primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-CD68 antibody (1:200, MCA341GA, lot# 0515; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA; RRID: AB_566872), and rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS antibody (1:50, ab3523, lot# GR3382908-1; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; RRID: AB_303872) were diluted in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum. After washing the section three times in PBS, the sample was incubated with the appropriate species-specific (anti-mouse and/or anti-rabbit) fluorescence-conjugated (Alexa Fluor 488 and/or 594) secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), diluted (1:1000) in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum, at room temperature for 2 h. After washing with PBS, the section was mounted using Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, ON, Canada) containing 4′-6-diamino-2-phenylindole to visualize the nuclei. The sample was viewed for the fluorescent labels on a ZEISS Axio Vert. A1 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed with an AxioCam MRm (Zeiss) camera (max resolution 1388 × 1040 pixels) using AxioVision Rel. 4.8 (Zeiss) software.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,651 | 0,273 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».