MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6939765016 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21357927

Nagata et al. Supplementary Figure S1

2022· other· en· W6939765016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryPolyclonal antibodiesFrozen section procedureStainingHydrogen peroxidePrimary and secondary antibodiesImmunofluorescenceAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplemental Figure S1. Representative images of inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressing (iNOS+) cells on postinjury day 5. A-B: Images were obtained from the damaged muscle in the icing group. A: A transverse section of injured muscle was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for iNOS, counterstained with hematoxylin. Black arrowheads indicate iNOS+ regenerating muscle cells with central nuclei. B: A transverse section of injured muscle was analyzed by immunofluorescence for CD68 (green) and iNOS (red). Nuclei were stained with 4′-6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue). Arrows indicate macrophages identified as positive color of CD68 surrounding a nucleus (blue). White arrowheads indicate iNOS+ cells excluding macrophages identified as single positive color of iNOS surrounding a nucleus (blue). Scale bars = 30 μm. Method for (A): Immunohistochemical staining was performed on the cross section of injured extensor digitorum longus muscle. Cryosection was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked and permeabilized with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum at room temperature for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibody: rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS antibody (1:50, ab3523, lot# GR3382908-1; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; RRID: AB_303872) was diluted in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum. After washing the section three times in PBS, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3 % hydrogen peroxide diluted in methanol for 30 min at room temperature. The section was then washed three times in PBS and was incubated with MAX-PO (R) (Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) secondary antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the section was placed in the 3,3′-diaminobenzidine reaction solution, counterstained with hematoxylin. The sample was viewed on an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with objectives and image was taken with a digital camera (DP20; Olympus). Method for (B): Immunofluorescence was performed on the cross section of injured extensor digitorum longus muscle. Cryosection was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS, blocked and permeabilized with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum and 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight or at room temperature for 1 h. The primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-CD68 antibody (1:200, MCA341GA, lot# 0515; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA; RRID: AB_566872), and rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS antibody (1:50, ab3523, lot# GR3382908-1; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; RRID: AB_303872) were diluted in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum. After washing the section three times in PBS, the sample was incubated with the appropriate species-specific (anti-mouse and/or anti-rabbit) fluorescence-conjugated (Alexa Fluor 488 and/or 594) secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), diluted (1:1000) in PBS containing 5% normal goat serum, at room temperature for 2 h. After washing with PBS, the section was mounted using Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, ON, Canada) containing 4′-6-diamino-2-phenylindole to visualize the nuclei. The sample was viewed for the fluorescent labels on a ZEISS Axio Vert. A1 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed with an AxioCam MRm (Zeiss) camera (max resolution 1388 × 1040 pixels) using AxioVision Rel. 4.8 (Zeiss) software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6510.273

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→