Dasydorylas gibber Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2024, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dasydorylas gibber sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6813D205-09E6-432E-A976-0446F6DB3CC3 Figs 14–26, 53 Diagnosis Postpedicel with aristiform apex. Tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally. Surstyli subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length; both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus with apex truncated and left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view. Apex of phallic guide with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view. Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth in lateral view. Etymology From the Latin ʻ gibber ʼ (= ʻhumpʼ), in reference to the shape of the lobe on the dorsal margin of the phallic guide in the male genitalia. Type material Holotype COLOMBIA – Boyacá • ♂; “ SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Cab.[Cabaña] Mamaramos; 05°25′ N, 73°27′ W; 2855 m [eters]; 23.May [V]– 08.Jun [VI].2000; P. Reina leg.”; IAvH (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerine, both pinned along with the specimen. Description Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Body length 4.8 mm, Wing length 5.8 mm. HEAD (Figs 14–15). Eyes contiguous for 19 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.4, 0.2. Frontal triangle dark brown, brown pruinose, with callus shiny dark brown. Occiput brown, brown pruinose.Antenna (Fig. 16) scape brown, with one seta dorsally; pedicel dark brown, with four setae dorsally and two ventrally; postpedicel with aristiform apex. LPP/WPP = 5.6. THORAX (Figs 15, 17). Postpronotal lobe dark brown, brown pruinose, with four long setae along upper margin. Scutum, ground color brown, brown pruinose, with one spot black anteriorly and dorsocentral setae conspicuous. Notopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum concolorous with scutum, with six long, stout and black setae in the posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite concolorous with notopleuron. WING (Fig. 18). Length 5.8 mm. LW/MWW = 3.2; LTC/LFC = 0.8. Membrane brown infuscated, vein M 1 slightly curved upward. Halter stem and knob completely beige ventrally, brown dorsally, except beige medial third of stem. LEGS (Figs 14–15). Coxae dark brown, gray-brown pruinose; fore trochanter brown; mid and hind trochanters brown, except brownish yellow distal third; femora dark brown, gray-brown pruinose, except brownish yellow apices, femora with conspicuous ctenidia and a row of long setae anterolaterally and posterolaterally; tibiae dark brown, with bases and apices brownish yellow; tarsomeres 1–5 yellowish brown; pulvilli brownish yellow. ABDOMEN (Figs 14–15, 19). Ground color velvety dark brown, with conspicuous scattered setae; tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 20. Syntergosternite 8 brown, gray-brown pruinose, slightly shorter than tergite 5, with a membranous area apically (Fig. 19). TERMINALIA (Figs 20–26). Epandrium and surstyli yellowish brown (Fig. 21). Surstyli (Figs 21–23) subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length in dorsal view. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, and outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus thicker than left, with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex rounded (Fig. 21); right surstylus with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex slightly rounded in lateral view (Figs 22–23). Gonopods asymmetrical, right gonopod thicker than left in ventral view (Fig. 24). Apex of phallic guide stout, with apex hook-shaped, with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view (Fig. 25). Ejaculatory apodeme parasol-shaped (Fig. 26). Phallus trifid, thin, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth (Fig. 25). Female Unknown. Geographical distribution Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 53). Habitat The specimen was collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of cloud Andean forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia. Remarks Based on males and due to the shape of surstyli, D. gibber sp. nov. (Fig. 21) is similar in appearance to D. colombiensis sp. nov. (Fig. 8). It differs from D. colombiensis sp. nov. by having the tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose, tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally (Figs 14–15, 19) (vs tergite 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, interrupted medially, in D. colombiensis sp. nov.; Figs 1–2, 6); left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view (Fig. 22) (vs left surstylus with apex sinuous when seen in lateral view; Fig. 9); apex of phallic guide with a translucid lobe lateroapically and a stout rigid lobe dorsally in lateral view (Fig. 25) (vs apex of phallic guide with upper margin slightly sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally; Fig. 12); phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth (Fig. 25) (vs phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half; Fig. 12).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».