MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6948878384 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11127162

Dasydorylas gibber Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6948878384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhallus (fungus)Apex (geometry)SetaHolotypeDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dasydorylas gibber sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6813D205-09E6-432E-A976-0446F6DB3CC3 Figs 14–26, 53 Diagnosis Postpedicel with aristiform apex. Tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally. Surstyli subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length; both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus with apex truncated and left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view. Apex of phallic guide with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view. Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth in lateral view. Etymology From the Latin ʻ gibber ʼ (= ʻhumpʼ), in reference to the shape of the lobe on the dorsal margin of the phallic guide in the male genitalia. Type material Holotype COLOMBIA – Boyacá • ♂; “ SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Cab.[Cabaña] Mamaramos; 05°25′ N, 73°27′ W; 2855 m [eters]; 23.May [V]– 08.Jun [VI].2000; P. Reina leg.”; IAvH (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerine, both pinned along with the specimen. Description Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Body length 4.8 mm, Wing length 5.8 mm. HEAD (Figs 14–15). Eyes contiguous for 19 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.4, 0.2. Frontal triangle dark brown, brown pruinose, with callus shiny dark brown. Occiput brown, brown pruinose.Antenna (Fig. 16) scape brown, with one seta dorsally; pedicel dark brown, with four setae dorsally and two ventrally; postpedicel with aristiform apex. LPP/WPP = 5.6. THORAX (Figs 15, 17). Postpronotal lobe dark brown, brown pruinose, with four long setae along upper margin. Scutum, ground color brown, brown pruinose, with one spot black anteriorly and dorsocentral setae conspicuous. Notopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum concolorous with scutum, with six long, stout and black setae in the posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite concolorous with notopleuron. WING (Fig. 18). Length 5.8 mm. LW/MWW = 3.2; LTC/LFC = 0.8. Membrane brown infuscated, vein M 1 slightly curved upward. Halter stem and knob completely beige ventrally, brown dorsally, except beige medial third of stem. LEGS (Figs 14–15). Coxae dark brown, gray-brown pruinose; fore trochanter brown; mid and hind trochanters brown, except brownish yellow distal third; femora dark brown, gray-brown pruinose, except brownish yellow apices, femora with conspicuous ctenidia and a row of long setae anterolaterally and posterolaterally; tibiae dark brown, with bases and apices brownish yellow; tarsomeres 1–5 yellowish brown; pulvilli brownish yellow. ABDOMEN (Figs 14–15, 19). Ground color velvety dark brown, with conspicuous scattered setae; tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 20. Syntergosternite 8 brown, gray-brown pruinose, slightly shorter than tergite 5, with a membranous area apically (Fig. 19). TERMINALIA (Figs 20–26). Epandrium and surstyli yellowish brown (Fig. 21). Surstyli (Figs 21–23) subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length in dorsal view. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, and outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus thicker than left, with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex rounded (Fig. 21); right surstylus with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex slightly rounded in lateral view (Figs 22–23). Gonopods asymmetrical, right gonopod thicker than left in ventral view (Fig. 24). Apex of phallic guide stout, with apex hook-shaped, with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view (Fig. 25). Ejaculatory apodeme parasol-shaped (Fig. 26). Phallus trifid, thin, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth (Fig. 25). Female Unknown. Geographical distribution Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 53). Habitat The specimen was collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of cloud Andean forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia. Remarks Based on males and due to the shape of surstyli, D. gibber sp. nov. (Fig. 21) is similar in appearance to D. colombiensis sp. nov. (Fig. 8). It differs from D. colombiensis sp. nov. by having the tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose, tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally (Figs 14–15, 19) (vs tergite 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, interrupted medially, in D. colombiensis sp. nov.; Figs 1–2, 6); left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view (Fig. 22) (vs left surstylus with apex sinuous when seen in lateral view; Fig. 9); apex of phallic guide with a translucid lobe lateroapically and a stout rigid lobe dorsally in lateral view (Fig. 25) (vs apex of phallic guide with upper margin slightly sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally; Fig. 12); phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth (Fig. 25) (vs phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half; Fig. 12).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→