Compsodactylus mendax Fuhrmann & Smith 2021, new species
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Compsodactylus mendax Fuhrmann & Smith, new species (Figs. 1−8, 15−16, 19−26) Type material. Male holotype (FSCA, Figs. 1−4), allotype (FSCA, Figs; 6−8), and male paratype (CMNC) all labeled (Fig. 5): “ PERU: Dept. Lima / Sta. Eulalia 1035m / 30−31 Mar 2011 / J.B. Heppner & C. Carrera ”. These specimens also have our corresponding red holotype and allotype labels and yellow paratype label. Diagnosis. Length greater than 8.0 mm; dorsal surface with metallic green reflections; antennae with 10 antennomers; clypeus elongate with expanded apex in males (Fig. 4); clypeus with short, spiny setae along apex and lateral edges in males; apex of protarsomere I 2 times wider than apex of protarsomere II in males; elytral striae distinctly punctate; male metatibial apex with an inner truncate, twisted process (Fig. 16); genitalia of females with gonostyle, and gonocoxite about 2.5 times longer than wide (Figs. 23−25). Holotype description. Length 9.0 mm, width 4.0 mm at the middle of elytra. Dorsal and ventral surface of head and thorax (except lateral edges of pronotum) black with metallic green reflections (Figs. 1−4); dorsal surface of elytra and lateral edges of pronotum yellowish brown with light metallic green reflections; ventral surface of abdomen shiny reddish brown, ventrite VI with anterior dark stripe; legs bicolored, reddish brown with dark sections and markings. Head with clypeus elongate, strongly expanded at apex (Fig. 4), surface glabrous medially and with short, spiny setae along apex and lateral edges. Frons surface with rugose punctures and densely setose, setae long, thin. Interocular distance 5 times wider than dorsal eye width. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, club longer than antennomeres II– VI combined. Pronotum surface rugose with long, dense setae, anterior margin with some minute, spiny setae. Elytra surface with moderately dense setae, striae distinctly punctate. Pygidium and ventral surface with dense punctures and hair-like setae. Protibia with 2 outer teeth, protarsomere I greatly enlarged with a padlike granulate ventral surface. Metafemur not strongly enlarged (about 2.1−2.4 times longer than wide, Fig. 15), inner margin without spines or carina and with some spiny setae. Metatibial apex with an inner, twisted process; metatibial spurs absent (Fig. 16). Variation. The allotype is 8.5 mm in length with the following sexually dimorphic characters: clypeus not elongate, without glabrous area, and with apex subquadrate, not expanded; frons with short, spiny setae; protarsomere I cylindrical, not enlarged; metatibial apex without inner process and with 2 spurs. Female terminalia bearing a pair of elongate paraprocts; gonocoxite about 2.5 longer than wide and divided in a proximal and a distal piece; a lateral plate between paraproct and proximal piece of gonocoxite is present, gonostyle present (Figs. 23−25). The elytral suture is yellow in holotype and black with metallic green reflections in the allotype and paratype. Distribution. The holotype, allotype, and a single paratype were collected in Santa Eulalia, Lima Department, Peru (approximately 11.902°S, 76.666°W) at 1035 m. Etymology. From the Latin mendax meaning liar, in reference to the elongate clypeus being reminiscent of Pinocchio’s nose. This name is a noun in apposition. Remarks. Compsodactylus mendax new species is easily distinguished from the other four species in the genus because the clypeal apex is enlarged in males while the other species have a trapezoidal clypeus (Fig. 4); the dorsal surface has green metallic reflections and antennae have 10 antennomeres in females, a character combination not found in other species. Compsodactylus mendax is similar to C. martinezi (Frey, 1972) and C. vallejoi Figueroa & Neita-Moreno, 2019 in that all three species have the apical spine of metatibia thick and projecting perpendicular to length of the tibiae in males (Figs. 13−18) and females have gonostyles. Compsodactylus argentinus and C. parvulus differ from these three species in that the apical spine of metatibia is thin and projecting parallel to the length of the tibia in males (Figs. 9−12) and females do not have gonostyles. Compsodactylus mendax is distinguished from C. martinezi and C. vallejoi by (characters of 1− C. martinezi and 2− C. vallejoi given in brackets): dorsal surface with metallic green reflections (1−as C. mendax; 2−without green reflections); antennae with 10 antennomeres (1−nine antennomeres; 2−as C. mendax: Jhon C. Neita Moreno, personal communication); male protarsomere I greatly enlarged (1−slightly enlarged; 2−as C. mendax); male metafemur slightly enlarged and approximately 2.1−2.4 times longer than wide (1 and 2−greatly enlarged and approximately 1.5−1.7 times longer than wide; Figs. 13, 15, 17); male metatarsus somewhat filiform (1−somewhat moniliform; 2−as C. mendax); male pygidium with hair-like setae (1−with scale-like setae; 2−as C. mendax); females with long gonocoxite (Figs. 23−25; 1 −wide; 2−comma-like).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».