Compsodactylus mendax Fuhrmann & Smith 2021, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compsodactylus mendax Fuhrmann & Smith, new species (Figs. 1−8, 15−16, 19−26) Type material. Male holotype (FSCA, Figs. 1−4), allotype (FSCA, Figs; 6−8), and male paratype (CMNC) all labeled (Fig. 5): “ PERU: Dept. Lima / Sta. Eulalia 1035m / 30−31 Mar 2011 / J.B. Heppner & C. Carrera ”. These specimens also have our corresponding red holotype and allotype labels and yellow paratype label. Diagnosis. Length greater than 8.0 mm; dorsal surface with metallic green reflections; antennae with 10 antennomers; clypeus elongate with expanded apex in males (Fig. 4); clypeus with short, spiny setae along apex and lateral edges in males; apex of protarsomere I 2 times wider than apex of protarsomere II in males; elytral striae distinctly punctate; male metatibial apex with an inner truncate, twisted process (Fig. 16); genitalia of females with gonostyle, and gonocoxite about 2.5 times longer than wide (Figs. 23−25). Holotype description. Length 9.0 mm, width 4.0 mm at the middle of elytra. Dorsal and ventral surface of head and thorax (except lateral edges of pronotum) black with metallic green reflections (Figs. 1−4); dorsal surface of elytra and lateral edges of pronotum yellowish brown with light metallic green reflections; ventral surface of abdomen shiny reddish brown, ventrite VI with anterior dark stripe; legs bicolored, reddish brown with dark sections and markings. Head with clypeus elongate, strongly expanded at apex (Fig. 4), surface glabrous medially and with short, spiny setae along apex and lateral edges. Frons surface with rugose punctures and densely setose, setae long, thin. Interocular distance 5 times wider than dorsal eye width. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, club longer than antennomeres II– VI combined. Pronotum surface rugose with long, dense setae, anterior margin with some minute, spiny setae. Elytra surface with moderately dense setae, striae distinctly punctate. Pygidium and ventral surface with dense punctures and hair-like setae. Protibia with 2 outer teeth, protarsomere I greatly enlarged with a padlike granulate ventral surface. Metafemur not strongly enlarged (about 2.1−2.4 times longer than wide, Fig. 15), inner margin without spines or carina and with some spiny setae. Metatibial apex with an inner, twisted process; metatibial spurs absent (Fig. 16). Variation. The allotype is 8.5 mm in length with the following sexually dimorphic characters: clypeus not elongate, without glabrous area, and with apex subquadrate, not expanded; frons with short, spiny setae; protarsomere I cylindrical, not enlarged; metatibial apex without inner process and with 2 spurs. Female terminalia bearing a pair of elongate paraprocts; gonocoxite about 2.5 longer than wide and divided in a proximal and a distal piece; a lateral plate between paraproct and proximal piece of gonocoxite is present, gonostyle present (Figs. 23−25). The elytral suture is yellow in holotype and black with metallic green reflections in the allotype and paratype. Distribution. The holotype, allotype, and a single paratype were collected in Santa Eulalia, Lima Department, Peru (approximately 11.902°S, 76.666°W) at 1035 m. Etymology. From the Latin mendax meaning liar, in reference to the elongate clypeus being reminiscent of Pinocchio’s nose. This name is a noun in apposition. Remarks. Compsodactylus mendax new species is easily distinguished from the other four species in the genus because the clypeal apex is enlarged in males while the other species have a trapezoidal clypeus (Fig. 4); the dorsal surface has green metallic reflections and antennae have 10 antennomeres in females, a character combination not found in other species. Compsodactylus mendax is similar to C. martinezi (Frey, 1972) and C. vallejoi Figueroa & Neita-Moreno, 2019 in that all three species have the apical spine of metatibia thick and projecting perpendicular to length of the tibiae in males (Figs. 13−18) and females have gonostyles. Compsodactylus argentinus and C. parvulus differ from these three species in that the apical spine of metatibia is thin and projecting parallel to the length of the tibia in males (Figs. 9−12) and females do not have gonostyles. Compsodactylus mendax is distinguished from C. martinezi and C. vallejoi by (characters of 1− C. martinezi and 2− C. vallejoi given in brackets): dorsal surface with metallic green reflections (1−as C. mendax; 2−without green reflections); antennae with 10 antennomeres (1−nine antennomeres; 2−as C. mendax: Jhon C. Neita Moreno, personal communication); male protarsomere I greatly enlarged (1−slightly enlarged; 2−as C. mendax); male metafemur slightly enlarged and approximately 2.1−2.4 times longer than wide (1 and 2−greatly enlarged and approximately 1.5−1.7 times longer than wide; Figs. 13, 15, 17); male metatarsus somewhat filiform (1−somewhat moniliform; 2−as C. mendax); male pygidium with hair-like setae (1−with scale-like setae; 2−as C. mendax); females with long gonocoxite (Figs. 23−25; 1 −wide; 2−comma-like).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".