Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Copidosoma floridanum Copidosoma floridanum could not develop on C. chalcites even though on additional replicates to the trial we confirmed that, during parasitism, eggs were oviposited inside host eggs. The trial on C. chalcites was repeated an additional three times (the last two times using individuals from new specimens collected from tomato fields), and parasitoid development was always unsuccessful. On T. ni as host, the mean (± SE) success of C. floridanum was 24.5 ± 2.88 out of 50 larvae, its mean brood size was 1478.05 ± 20.25 parasitoids per larvae (range: 761–2037), and its development time from oviposition to adult emergence was 33.44 ± 0.14 days, from oviposition to cocoon formation was 21.81 ± 0.13 days, and from cocoon to adult emergence was 11.68 ± 0.06 days. Host mortality on parasitised hosts (T. ni = 4.40 ± 1.02 dead larvae; C. chalcites = 1.40 ± 0.37 dead larvae) was similar (T. ni: U = 49.00, P = 0.971; C. chalcites: F 1,18 = 1.301, P = 0.269) to their respective nonparasitised hosts (T. ni = 3.70 ± 0.80 dead larvae; C. chalcites = 0.90 ± 0.23 dead larvae). The host success was also similar (T. ni: F 1,18 = 0.542, P = 0.471; C. chalcites: F 1,18 = 0.746, P = 0.399) between parasitised (T. ni = 35.80 ± 2.98 larvae; C. chalcites = 32.10 ± 2.32 larvae) and nonparasitised hosts (T. ni = 33.10 ± 2.14 larvae; C. chalcites = 29.10 ± 2.58 larvae). Host mortality was higher in T. ni than in C. chalcites, host success was lower in T. ni than in C. chalcites and was similar between parasitised hosts (F 1,18 = 7.584, P = 0.018; F 1,18 = 47.335, P <0.001; F 1,18 = 0.959, P = 0.340, respectively; Fig. 4). The development times from oviposition to pupa formation and from pupa to adult emergence were similar for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised T. ni and from nonparasitised T. ni eggs, but the time from egg to adult emergence was longer for those developing from parasitised hosts (U = 8748.50, P = 0.076; U = 10 467.50, P = 0.615; U = 11 793.00, P = 0.028, respectively; Fig. 5). The times from oviposition to pupa formation and from oviposition to adult emergence were longer for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised C. chalcites than for those developing from nonparasitised eggs, but the time from pupa to adult emergence did not differ significantly (U = 62 164.00, P <0.001; U = 61 545.50, P <0.001; U = 43 863.00, P = 0.404, respectively; Fig. 5). The development times from oviposition to pupa formation, from pupa to adult emergence, and from oviposition to adult emergence were shorter for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised T. ni than the development times for parasitised C. chalcites (U = 20 287.00, P <0.001; U = 16 150.50, P <0.001; U = 20 252.50, P <0.001, respectively; Fig. 5). Development times from oviposition to pupa formation, from pupa to adult emergence, and from oviposition to adult emergence were shorter for hosts that developed into moths from nonparasitised T. ni than for nonparasitised C. chalcites (U = 1834.00, P <0.001; U = 67 703.50, P <0.001; U = 81 246.00, P <0.001, respectively; Fig. 5).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».