Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copidosoma floridanum Copidosoma floridanum could not develop on C. chalcites even though on additional replicates to the trial we confirmed that, during parasitism, eggs were oviposited inside host eggs. The trial on C. chalcites was repeated an additional three times (the last two times using individuals from new specimens collected from tomato fields), and parasitoid development was always unsuccessful. On T. ni as host, the mean (± SE) success of C. floridanum was 24.5 ± 2.88 out of 50 larvae, its mean brood size was 1478.05 ± 20.25 parasitoids per larvae (range: 761–2037), and its development time from oviposition to adult emergence was 33.44 ± 0.14 days, from oviposition to cocoon formation was 21.81 ± 0.13 days, and from cocoon to adult emergence was 11.68 ± 0.06 days. Host mortality on parasitised hosts (T. ni = 4.40 ± 1.02 dead larvae; C. chalcites = 1.40 ± 0.37 dead larvae) was similar (T. ni: U = 49.00, P = 0.971; C. chalcites: F 1,18 = 1.301, P = 0.269) to their respective nonparasitised hosts (T. ni = 3.70 ± 0.80 dead larvae; C. chalcites = 0.90 ± 0.23 dead larvae). The host success was also similar (T. ni: F 1,18 = 0.542, P = 0.471; C. chalcites: F 1,18 = 0.746, P = 0.399) between parasitised (T. ni = 35.80 ± 2.98 larvae; C. chalcites = 32.10 ± 2.32 larvae) and nonparasitised hosts (T. ni = 33.10 ± 2.14 larvae; C. chalcites = 29.10 ± 2.58 larvae). Host mortality was higher in T. ni than in C. chalcites, host success was lower in T. ni than in C. chalcites and was similar between parasitised hosts (F 1,18 = 7.584, P = 0.018; F 1,18 = 47.335, P <0.001; F 1,18 = 0.959, P = 0.340, respectively; Fig. 4). The development times from oviposition to pupa formation and from pupa to adult emergence were similar for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised T. ni and from nonparasitised T. ni eggs, but the time from egg to adult emergence was longer for those developing from parasitised hosts (U = 8748.50, P = 0.076; U = 10 467.50, P = 0.615; U = 11 793.00, P = 0.028, respectively; Fig. 5). The times from oviposition to pupa formation and from oviposition to adult emergence were longer for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised C. chalcites than for those developing from nonparasitised eggs, but the time from pupa to adult emergence did not differ significantly (U = 62 164.00, P <0.001; U = 61 545.50, P <0.001; U = 43 863.00, P = 0.404, respectively; Fig. 5). The development times from oviposition to pupa formation, from pupa to adult emergence, and from oviposition to adult emergence were shorter for hosts that developed into moths from parasitised T. ni than the development times for parasitised C. chalcites (U = 20 287.00, P <0.001; U = 16 150.50, P <0.001; U = 20 252.50, P <0.001, respectively; Fig. 5). Development times from oviposition to pupa formation, from pupa to adult emergence, and from oviposition to adult emergence were shorter for hosts that developed into moths from nonparasitised T. ni than for nonparasitised C. chalcites (U = 1834.00, P <0.001; U = 67 703.50, P <0.001; U = 81 246.00, P <0.001, respectively; Fig. 5).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".