MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6949960178 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337963

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6949960178 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOrange (colour)PsylloideaWestern hemisphere

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CECDA0EF-D202-45AB-8358-ADC1585CCA15 Figs 78– 80, 90N Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum spivakae sp. nov. can be recognized by their small size (about 4 mm), face, hypoepimeron, and mesepisternum shiny with uniformly large and dense punctures (i <1 pd), scutum densely punctate except for small sparsely punctate areas just mesad of the parapsidal lines (i=1–2 pd), metasomal terga with tomentum sparse or absent except on T4–5, pronotal angle obtuse, T2 without dark spiracular spots, T1–3 usually red-orange with distinct, sharply delineated dark bands on T1 and T3, and T4–5 redddish brown to black. They are most similar to L. hudsoniellum and L. perditum sp. nov. Females of L. hudsoniellum have T1–5 with dense tomentum, scutum uniformly punctate, pronotal angle nearly 90 degrees, and metasoma orange to black but not distinctly banded. Females of L. perditum sp. nov. have the head and mesosoma sparsely punctate (i=1–6 pd) and metasoma redorange without distinct bands. Males of L. spivakae sp. nov. can be recognized by their small size (about 4 mm), T1–3 uniformly shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i =1–2 pd) with no change in sculpture across the premarginal line, mesepisternum densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd), flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.4 times as long as F1 and 1.25 times as long as broad), and metasoma all black. They are most similar to L. perditum sp. nov. and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Males of L. perditum sp. nov. have T1–3 rims more sparsely and less distinctly punctate than discs, T4–5 with sparser tomentum, and flagellomeres relatively longer (F2 about 1.75 times as long as F1 and 1.4 times as long as broad). Males of L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. have T1–3 rims impunctate, metasomal terga with sparse tomentum, and metasoma usually partially reddish brown to orange. Etymology The specific epithet spivakae is a dedication to Marla Spivak, in recognition of her accomplishments as head of the University of Minnesota Bee Lab and her support during the lead author’s years of work there. It is applied to this particular species because of the typical colour pattern of the female metasoma, which resembles that of a honey bee. An appropriate translation would be Spivak’s sweat bee. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Utah • ♀; Uintah Co., 15 mi. S of Roosevelt; 40.0834° N, 109.9781° W; 15 May 2012; S. C. Clark leg.; BBSL. [Verbatim label: USA:UT Uintah Co. 15 mi. S of Roosevelt 12 587123E 4437512N 15 May 2012 S.C. Clark Pantrap, white / UBU-3 T-13 / BBSL821375 // BOLD / gard0142-UT / DLIII165-19 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes UNITED STATES – Arizona • 2 ♀♀; Mojave Co., 11 mi. N of Mt. Trumbull; [36.56° N, 113.14° W]; 9 Jun. 1994; G. Bryant leg.; ex Argemone; BBSL • 1 ♀; 24 mi. W of Cameron; [35.87° N, 111.84° W]; 3 Jul. 1952; R.H. and L.D. Beamer, C. Weiner, A. Wolf, C. Liang and W. LaBerge leg.; SEMC. – Colorado • 1♀; Fremont Co., 6 mi. NE of Florence; [38.45° N, 105.04° W]; 11 Aug. 1964; J. G., B. L. and K.C. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 5.5 air mi. ESE of De Beque; 39.3605° N, 108.3134° W; 1725 m a.s.l.; 10 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 27 Apr. 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 4 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 5.58 air mi. ESE of De Beque; 39.3597° N, 108.3127° W; 1727 m a.s.l.; 4 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 0.3 air mi. S of Pyramid Rock; 39.3043° N, 108.2703° W; 1534 m a.s.l.; 8 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 35 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 3–4 Aug. 2011; WRME • 8 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 3–4 Aug. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 15–16 Jun. 2011; WRME • 2 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 15–16 Jun. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 25–26 May 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 25–26 May 2011; WRME • 4 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 24–25 Aug. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 24–25 Aug. 2011; WRME. – Nevada • 4 ♀♀; Clark Co., 0.9 mi. E Indian Ridge; 36.4765° N, 115.6351° W; 1396 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Sphenosciadium capitellatum; BBSL • 1 ♀; Clark Co., 1.4 mi. E of Mule Spr.; 36.0313° N, 115.5553° W; 2 Jun. 2005; S. Higbee leg.; ex Fallugia paradoxa; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; Clark Co., 2.7 mi. SE of Horse Sprs.; 36.2704° N, 115.8531° W; 1535 m a.s.l.; 27 Aug. 2004; E. Rentz leg.; ex Stephanomeria pauciflora; BBSL • 5 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 21 Jul. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Stanleya pinnata; BBSL • 1 ♀; Clark Co., 16.91 mi. SE of Devils Hole Hills; 36.2433° N, 115.8991° W; 20 Jun. 2005; R. Andrus leg.; ex Stanleya sp.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Clark Co., Peek-A-Boo Canyon; 36.5326° N, 115.1117° W; 1760 m a.s.l.; 16 Aug. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Eriogonum cernuum; BBSL • 2 ♀♀; Clark Co., Trout Canyon; 36.1519° N, 115.7211° W; 1474 m a.s.l.; 28 Jul. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 3 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; D. Skandilis leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; PCYU • 1 ♀; Clark Co., Willow Creek Campground, Charleston Mountains; [36.43° N, 115.77° W]; 14 Jul. 1977; R.O. Schuster leg.; UCDC. – Texas • 2 ♀♀, 10 ♂♂; Jeff Davis Co., 0.5 mi. S of Kent; [31.06° N, 104.22° W]; 29 May 1999; L. Packer leg.; PCYU. – Utah • 1 ♀; Emery Co., 9 km N of Goblin Valley St. Pk.; [38.65° N, 110.7° W]; 1360 m a.s.l.; 14 Aug. 1992; D. Yanega leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Emery Co., 1 air km SE of Gilson Butte; 38.587° N, 110.5922° W; 1558 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2000; F.D. Parker leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Garfield Co., 1.7 mi. WSW of Pioneer Mesa; 37.7876° N, 111.1682° W; 6 May 2002; S. Higbee leg.; ex Mahonia fremontii; BBSL • 1 ♀; Kane Co., 1 mi. W of Wagon Box Mesa, nr 2A99; [37.82° N, 111.09° W]; 26 May 2000; R. Andrus leg.; ex Purshia mexicana; PCYU • 1 ♀; Kane Co., Croton Canyon; [37.2° N, 111.3° W]; 6 Jun. 2000; J. Grixti leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 4 Jun. 2000; O. Messinger leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Uintah Co., 15 mi. SW of Fort Duchesne; 40.0918° N, 109.914° W; 11 May 2012; S. C. Clark leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Uintah Co., Johnson Draw; 39.7619° N, 109.697° W; 1819 m a.s.l.; 15 May 2011; M. Lewis leg.; ex Hesperidanthus suffrutescens; BBSL • 1 ♀; Wayne Co., 2 mi. W of Caineville; [38.33° N, 111.06° W]; 28 Jun. 1999; L. Packer leg.; PCYU. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to olive green; clypeus apical colour reddish brown to orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black basal spot and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, light brown ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma orange with base of T1, median band on T3, and T4–5 entirely brown, dark spiracular spots on T3–4; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints and tarsi mostly orange; tegula pale amber to brown; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta brown, otherwise pale amber to light brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum dense on gena, pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, and T4–5; sparse on T3 apicolaterally. Scutum hair thin to slightly densely plumose. Wing hairs dark or light, short and dense. Acarinarial fan complete or incomplete, very sparse. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures dense on basal margin (i ≤ 1 pd), large and irregularly sparse apically (i <3 pd), sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i=1–3 pd), sculpture shiny; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures dense (i <1 pd), sculpture shiny; vertex punctures dense laterally (i <1 pd), sparse medially (i= 1–2 pd), sculpture shiny; gena punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; postgena sculpture shiny, becoming weakly ruguloso-lineate to imbricate adjacent to hypostomal carina; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures dense (i <1 pd), becoming sparse submedially and anteromedially (i =1–2 pd), sculpture tessellate, becoming shiny laterally and posteriorly; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i <1 pd), sparse submedially (i=1–3 pd), sculpture imbricate marginally, shiny medially; metanotum sculpture imbricate; metapostnotum rugae strong, highly anastomosing, nearly reaching margin, sculpture imbricate; preëpisternum sculpture reticulate-punctate; hypoepimeron punctures crowded (i=0 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes ruguloso-punctate; mesepisternum punctures crowded (i =0 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes weakly reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, rugulose medially, shiny with crowded punctures ventrally (i= 0 pd); propodeum lateral face sculpture ruguloso-punctate anteriorly, becoming tessellate posteriorly; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures sparse (i=1–3 pd), impunctate in large apicolateral oval patches, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sparse or impunctate in small apicolateral oval patches, disc sculpture shiny, rim punctures fine, sparse (i= 1–3 pd), rim sculpture shiny. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.87 (± 0.03 SD). Clypeus projecting ~67% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.39 (± 0.02 SD); apicolateral denticles low rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.65 (± 0.04 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle obtuse; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.73 (± 0.06 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.82 (± 0.04 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.89 (± 0.27 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.69 (± 0.16 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.63 (± 0.05 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin;

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,047

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207