MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949960178 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337963

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6949960178 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrange (colour)PsylloideaWestern hemisphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CECDA0EF-D202-45AB-8358-ADC1585CCA15 Figs 78– 80, 90N Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum spivakae sp. nov. can be recognized by their small size (about 4 mm), face, hypoepimeron, and mesepisternum shiny with uniformly large and dense punctures (i <1 pd), scutum densely punctate except for small sparsely punctate areas just mesad of the parapsidal lines (i=1–2 pd), metasomal terga with tomentum sparse or absent except on T4–5, pronotal angle obtuse, T2 without dark spiracular spots, T1–3 usually red-orange with distinct, sharply delineated dark bands on T1 and T3, and T4–5 redddish brown to black. They are most similar to L. hudsoniellum and L. perditum sp. nov. Females of L. hudsoniellum have T1–5 with dense tomentum, scutum uniformly punctate, pronotal angle nearly 90 degrees, and metasoma orange to black but not distinctly banded. Females of L. perditum sp. nov. have the head and mesosoma sparsely punctate (i=1–6 pd) and metasoma redorange without distinct bands. Males of L. spivakae sp. nov. can be recognized by their small size (about 4 mm), T1–3 uniformly shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i =1–2 pd) with no change in sculpture across the premarginal line, mesepisternum densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd), flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.4 times as long as F1 and 1.25 times as long as broad), and metasoma all black. They are most similar to L. perditum sp. nov. and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Males of L. perditum sp. nov. have T1–3 rims more sparsely and less distinctly punctate than discs, T4–5 with sparser tomentum, and flagellomeres relatively longer (F2 about 1.75 times as long as F1 and 1.4 times as long as broad). Males of L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. have T1–3 rims impunctate, metasomal terga with sparse tomentum, and metasoma usually partially reddish brown to orange. Etymology The specific epithet spivakae is a dedication to Marla Spivak, in recognition of her accomplishments as head of the University of Minnesota Bee Lab and her support during the lead author’s years of work there. It is applied to this particular species because of the typical colour pattern of the female metasoma, which resembles that of a honey bee. An appropriate translation would be Spivak’s sweat bee. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Utah • ♀; Uintah Co., 15 mi. S of Roosevelt; 40.0834° N, 109.9781° W; 15 May 2012; S. C. Clark leg.; BBSL. [Verbatim label: USA:UT Uintah Co. 15 mi. S of Roosevelt 12 587123E 4437512N 15 May 2012 S.C. Clark Pantrap, white / UBU-3 T-13 / BBSL821375 // BOLD / gard0142-UT / DLIII165-19 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) spivakae Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes UNITED STATES – Arizona • 2 ♀♀; Mojave Co., 11 mi. N of Mt. Trumbull; [36.56° N, 113.14° W]; 9 Jun. 1994; G. Bryant leg.; ex Argemone; BBSL • 1 ♀; 24 mi. W of Cameron; [35.87° N, 111.84° W]; 3 Jul. 1952; R.H. and L.D. Beamer, C. Weiner, A. Wolf, C. Liang and W. LaBerge leg.; SEMC. – Colorado • 1♀; Fremont Co., 6 mi. NE of Florence; [38.45° N, 105.04° W]; 11 Aug. 1964; J. G., B. L. and K.C. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 5.5 air mi. ESE of De Beque; 39.3605° N, 108.3134° W; 1725 m a.s.l.; 10 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 27 Apr. 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 4 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 5.58 air mi. ESE of De Beque; 39.3597° N, 108.3127° W; 1727 m a.s.l.; 4 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Mesa Co., 0.3 air mi. S of Pyramid Rock; 39.3043° N, 108.2703° W; 1534 m a.s.l.; 8 May 2012; J. Florez leg.; BBSL • 35 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 3–4 Aug. 2011; WRME • 8 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 3–4 Aug. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 15–16 Jun. 2011; WRME • 2 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 15–16 Jun. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 25–26 May 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 25–26 May 2011; WRME • 4 ♀♀; Mesa Co.; 39.1019° N, 108.7376° W; 24–25 Aug. 2011; WRME • 1 ♀; Mesa Co.; 39.0295° N, 108.6276° W; 24–25 Aug. 2011; WRME. – Nevada • 4 ♀♀; Clark Co., 0.9 mi. E Indian Ridge; 36.4765° N, 115.6351° W; 1396 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Sphenosciadium capitellatum; BBSL • 1 ♀; Clark Co., 1.4 mi. E of Mule Spr.; 36.0313° N, 115.5553° W; 2 Jun. 2005; S. Higbee leg.; ex Fallugia paradoxa; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; Clark Co., 2.7 mi. SE of Horse Sprs.; 36.2704° N, 115.8531° W; 1535 m a.s.l.; 27 Aug. 2004; E. Rentz leg.; ex Stephanomeria pauciflora; BBSL • 5 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 21 Jul. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Stanleya pinnata; BBSL • 1 ♀; Clark Co., 16.91 mi. SE of Devils Hole Hills; 36.2433° N, 115.8991° W; 20 Jun. 2005; R. Andrus leg.; ex Stanleya sp.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Clark Co., Peek-A-Boo Canyon; 36.5326° N, 115.1117° W; 1760 m a.s.l.; 16 Aug. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Eriogonum cernuum; BBSL • 2 ♀♀; Clark Co., Trout Canyon; 36.1519° N, 115.7211° W; 1474 m a.s.l.; 28 Jul. 2004; S. Higbee leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 3 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; D. Skandilis leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 28 Jul. 2004; E. Ahlstrom leg.; ex Eriogonum deflexum; PCYU • 1 ♀; Clark Co., Willow Creek Campground, Charleston Mountains; [36.43° N, 115.77° W]; 14 Jul. 1977; R.O. Schuster leg.; UCDC. – Texas • 2 ♀♀, 10 ♂♂; Jeff Davis Co., 0.5 mi. S of Kent; [31.06° N, 104.22° W]; 29 May 1999; L. Packer leg.; PCYU. – Utah • 1 ♀; Emery Co., 9 km N of Goblin Valley St. Pk.; [38.65° N, 110.7° W]; 1360 m a.s.l.; 14 Aug. 1992; D. Yanega leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Emery Co., 1 air km SE of Gilson Butte; 38.587° N, 110.5922° W; 1558 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2000; F.D. Parker leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Garfield Co., 1.7 mi. WSW of Pioneer Mesa; 37.7876° N, 111.1682° W; 6 May 2002; S. Higbee leg.; ex Mahonia fremontii; BBSL • 1 ♀; Kane Co., 1 mi. W of Wagon Box Mesa, nr 2A99; [37.82° N, 111.09° W]; 26 May 2000; R. Andrus leg.; ex Purshia mexicana; PCYU • 1 ♀; Kane Co., Croton Canyon; [37.2° N, 111.3° W]; 6 Jun. 2000; J. Grixti leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; BBSL • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 4 Jun. 2000; O. Messinger leg.; ex Tamarix sp.; PCYU • 1 ♀; Uintah Co., 15 mi. SW of Fort Duchesne; 40.0918° N, 109.914° W; 11 May 2012; S. C. Clark leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Uintah Co., Johnson Draw; 39.7619° N, 109.697° W; 1819 m a.s.l.; 15 May 2011; M. Lewis leg.; ex Hesperidanthus suffrutescens; BBSL • 1 ♀; Wayne Co., 2 mi. W of Caineville; [38.33° N, 111.06° W]; 28 Jun. 1999; L. Packer leg.; PCYU. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to olive green; clypeus apical colour reddish brown to orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black basal spot and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, light brown ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma orange with base of T1, median band on T3, and T4–5 entirely brown, dark spiracular spots on T3–4; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints and tarsi mostly orange; tegula pale amber to brown; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta brown, otherwise pale amber to light brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum dense on gena, pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, and T4–5; sparse on T3 apicolaterally. Scutum hair thin to slightly densely plumose. Wing hairs dark or light, short and dense. Acarinarial fan complete or incomplete, very sparse. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures dense on basal margin (i ≤ 1 pd), large and irregularly sparse apically (i <3 pd), sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i=1–3 pd), sculpture shiny; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures dense (i <1 pd), sculpture shiny; vertex punctures dense laterally (i <1 pd), sparse medially (i= 1–2 pd), sculpture shiny; gena punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; postgena sculpture shiny, becoming weakly ruguloso-lineate to imbricate adjacent to hypostomal carina; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures dense (i <1 pd), becoming sparse submedially and anteromedially (i =1–2 pd), sculpture tessellate, becoming shiny laterally and posteriorly; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i <1 pd), sparse submedially (i=1–3 pd), sculpture imbricate marginally, shiny medially; metanotum sculpture imbricate; metapostnotum rugae strong, highly anastomosing, nearly reaching margin, sculpture imbricate; preëpisternum sculpture reticulate-punctate; hypoepimeron punctures crowded (i=0 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes ruguloso-punctate; mesepisternum punctures crowded (i =0 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes weakly reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, rugulose medially, shiny with crowded punctures ventrally (i= 0 pd); propodeum lateral face sculpture ruguloso-punctate anteriorly, becoming tessellate posteriorly; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures sparse (i=1–3 pd), impunctate in large apicolateral oval patches, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sparse or impunctate in small apicolateral oval patches, disc sculpture shiny, rim punctures fine, sparse (i= 1–3 pd), rim sculpture shiny. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.87 (± 0.03 SD). Clypeus projecting ~67% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.39 (± 0.02 SD); apicolateral denticles low rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.65 (± 0.04 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle obtuse; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.73 (± 0.06 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.82 (± 0.04 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.89 (± 0.27 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.69 (± 0.16 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.63 (± 0.05 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207