BIDS Derivatives: Standardization of Processing Results in Brain Imaging
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction We present BIDS-Derivatives, a set of principles for organizing and describing outputs of computations performed on brain imaging data, enabling researchers and tools to understand and reuse those outputs in subsequent processing. BIDS-Derivatives is an extension to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), which is a standard for organizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2], electrophysiological [6, 7, 8] and behavioral data generated by a broad range of neuroscientific experiments. BIDS has facilitated the generation of tools (BIDS-Apps) [3] that may run with minimal intervention on BIDS datasets, adapting to the details of the available data. BIDS also provides a common structure for archiving data, both within labs and in large-scale databases such as OpenNeuro [4] and the NIMH Data Archive [10]. Methods The BIDS specification is hosted on GitHub and published on ReadTheDocs [9]. Significant modifications to BIDS are formulated as BIDS Extension Proposals (BEPs), which may be developed as separate documents or as "forks" of the document source. Derivatives were conceived during early BIDS discussions as a category distinct from raw experimental data, ranging from preprocessed data to publishable results. A BEP was initially drafted in February 2016. Further work defining the scope of derivatives at an August 2017 meeting led to the division of the effort into fine-grained proposals [5]. In July 2018, a survey of the neuroimaging community was taken to establish priorities (essential, desirable or inessential) for structural, functional and diffusion MRI derivatives. The results of the survey were posted [1] in advance of an August 2018 workshop of 31 participants, where sub-proposals were pushed toward completion and common principles were established. In December 2018, Release Candidate 1 was published, including all imaging modalities, for implementation and feedback. In July 2019, a "Common Derivatives" proposal was re-introduced establishing more general principles, to be followed by subsequent modality-specific and non-imaging proposals. Results BIDS-Derivatives are specified in version 1.3.0 of the BIDS standard. This initial release specifies common derivatives, including dataset-level metadata, naming rules for preprocessed data of any modality, and generic imaging derivatives. Dataset metadata and organization follow BIDS conventions, and have been extended to allow the source dataset(s) to be linked and provenance information recorded of software used to generate the dataset. File-level naming rules permit space and desc keywords, allowing pipelines to distinguish files by a reference space or a generic description field. Custom references spaces may also be specified with the SpatialReference metadata field. All derived files must distinguish themselves from original (e.g., raw) data files by some component in the filename, permitting the inclusion of original and derived data in the same dataset, if necessary. Imaging-specific derivatives specified in this initial release include naming conventions for resampling parameters (e.g., resolution and surface mesh density) and specifications of regions of interest as masks or deterministic and probabilistic segmentations. Conclusions A standard for specifying derivatives will simplify the sharing and archiving of preprocessed data and the results of analyses. It will permit data repositories to provide canonical, preprocessed versions of datasets, simplify further automated processing, and facilitate collaboration between researchers and replication of analyses of published datasets. This initial release establishes common principles that guide future derivative specifications. Additional specifications of anatomical, functional and diffusion derivatives are planned within the next year, and electrophysiological, positron emission tomography, and connectomic derivatives are in progress. BIDS is an open effort, and everyone is encouraged to contribute, regardless of level of expertise.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,043 | 0,106 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,010 | 0,015 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,056 | 0,046 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».