MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949998001 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3941041

BIDS Derivatives: Standardization of Processing Results in Brain Imaging

2020· article· en· W6949998001 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh Research Explorer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationNeuroinformaticsNeuroimagingSet (abstract data type)Scope (computer science)Raw dataExtension (predicate logic)Workflow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction We present BIDS-Derivatives, a set of principles for organizing and describing outputs of computations performed on brain imaging data, enabling researchers and tools to understand and reuse those outputs in subsequent processing. BIDS-Derivatives is an extension to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), which is a standard for organizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2], electrophysiological [6, 7, 8] and behavioral data generated by a broad range of neuroscientific experiments. BIDS has facilitated the generation of tools (BIDS-Apps) [3] that may run with minimal intervention on BIDS datasets, adapting to the details of the available data. BIDS also provides a common structure for archiving data, both within labs and in large-scale databases such as OpenNeuro [4] and the NIMH Data Archive [10]. Methods The BIDS specification is hosted on GitHub and published on ReadTheDocs [9]. Significant modifications to BIDS are formulated as BIDS Extension Proposals (BEPs), which may be developed as separate documents or as "forks" of the document source. Derivatives were conceived during early BIDS discussions as a category distinct from raw experimental data, ranging from preprocessed data to publishable results. A BEP was initially drafted in February 2016. Further work defining the scope of derivatives at an August 2017 meeting led to the division of the effort into fine-grained proposals [5]. In July 2018, a survey of the neuroimaging community was taken to establish priorities (essential, desirable or inessential) for structural, functional and diffusion MRI derivatives. The results of the survey were posted [1] in advance of an August 2018 workshop of 31 participants, where sub-proposals were pushed toward completion and common principles were established. In December 2018, Release Candidate 1 was published, including all imaging modalities, for implementation and feedback. In July 2019, a "Common Derivatives" proposal was re-introduced establishing more general principles, to be followed by subsequent modality-specific and non-imaging proposals. Results BIDS-Derivatives are specified in version 1.3.0 of the BIDS standard. This initial release specifies common derivatives, including dataset-level metadata, naming rules for preprocessed data of any modality, and generic imaging derivatives. Dataset metadata and organization follow BIDS conventions, and have been extended to allow the source dataset(s) to be linked and provenance information recorded of software used to generate the dataset. File-level naming rules permit space and desc keywords, allowing pipelines to distinguish files by a reference space or a generic description field. Custom references spaces may also be specified with the SpatialReference metadata field. All derived files must distinguish themselves from original (e.g., raw) data files by some component in the filename, permitting the inclusion of original and derived data in the same dataset, if necessary. Imaging-specific derivatives specified in this initial release include naming conventions for resampling parameters (e.g., resolution and surface mesh density) and specifications of regions of interest as masks or deterministic and probabilistic segmentations. Conclusions A standard for specifying derivatives will simplify the sharing and archiving of preprocessed data and the results of analyses. It will permit data repositories to provide canonical, preprocessed versions of datasets, simplify further automated processing, and facilitate collaboration between researchers and replication of analyses of published datasets. This initial release establishes common principles that guide future derivative specifications. Additional specifications of anatomical, functional and diffusion derivatives are planned within the next year, and electrophysiological, positron emission tomography, and connectomic derivatives are in progress. BIDS is an open effort, and everyone is encouraged to contribute, regardless of level of expertise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.106
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.106
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0100.015
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh Research ExplorerSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207