Cynomops greenhalli G. G. Goodwin 1958
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
54. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat Cynomops greenhalli French: Cynomope de Greenhall / German: Greenhall-Bulldogfledermaus / Spanish: Cynomop de Greenhall Taxonomy. Cynomops greenhalli G. G. Goodwin, 1958, “Royal Botanic Gardens, Port of Spain, Trinidad.” This species is monotypic. Distribution. Known from scattered localities in lowlands of Central America, in Belize, N Honduras, Costa Rica, and Panama, and N South America, in C Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Brazilian Amazon; also Trinidad I. Descriptive notes. Head-body 54-9-78 mm, tail 24-34 mm, ear 12-5-17 mm, hindfoot 6-12 mm, forearm 33-39-7 mm; weight 10-8-23-9 g. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat shows sexual dimorphism in size, males being larger; there are also size differences acrossits distribution, with populations from west of Andes larger than those east of Andes. It is very similar to Miller’s Dogfaced Bat (C. miller). Dorsal pelage is dark chocolate-brown to light reddish brown; venteris paler, with a conspicuous even paler portion from throat to mid-venter; pelage 1s silky, but dorsal fur is not long (c. 4 mm at shoulder); dorsal hairs are bicolored, with basal one-third pale buff. Face is blackish and virtually naked. Upper lip and dorsal border of narial region is smooth. Triangular blackish ears are slightly separated from each other on forehead (space less than 4 mm). Patagium, feet, and tail are also blackish. Propatagium is narrow, and posterior plagiopatagium is inserted lateral to base of feet. There 1s dark chocolate-brown or reddish-brown fur along basal one-third of forearm and along adjacent propatagium. A patch of fur extends from posterodorsal surface of distal plagiopatagium, next to wrist, to fourth dactylopatagium. Skull has a long rostrum with anterior face oflacrimal ridge forming abrupt angle with forehead. Nasal process of premaxilla is well developed, with lateral margin of external nares straight. Incisive foramina are located relatively distant from accessory foramen. Basisphenoid pits are absent, and there is a shallow fossa on posterior squamosal bone, where posterior zygomatic arch meets braincase. Mandible is massive in males with a concave ramus along its length; P, measures at least two-thirds the height of P,. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 34 and FN = 56 or 60. Habitat. Tropical dry forests and lowland rainforests from Central America to northern South America, including the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The species is present in primary and secondary forests. Elevational range is from sea level to 975 m. Food and Feeding. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat is an aerial insectivore, and insects of the orders Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera (Formicidae) have been recorded in its diet in Costa Rica. In captivity, this species ate flying termites, while refusing a variety of other insects. Breeding. Pregnant females were recorded in June, and lactating females in April and July. Females give birth to a single young. Activity patterns. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat has been caught early in the night, and has been trapped in mist nets set over streams or ponds and in canopy nets set 20 m high. It is known to roost in buildings and hollow trees. A colony of eight individuals was caught from the hollow branches of a yellow Poui tree (Tabebuia serratifolia, Bignoniaceae) on Trinidad. This colony occupied the tree for at least six months before it was cut down. The bats emerged from the roost regularly each evening c.15 minutes before dark. They flew fast from the roost, downward, then upward, one bat following the other at intervals of c.1 second, until six of eight were in flight. About 15-20 minutes later some bats returned to the roost. The general shape of the calls of Cynomops species are similar, with Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bats calling at the lowest frequencies (mean end frequency of low QCF calls at 17-4 kHz + 3-6 kHz SD). Movements, Home range and Social organization. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bats roost in colonies that can comprise 50-75 individuals. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Bibliography. Bernard (2001), Eger (2008), Gardner et al. (1970), Goodwin (1958a), Goodwin & Greenhall (1961), Handley (1976), Jung et al. (2014), LaVal & Fitch (1977), Linares & Kiblisky (1969), Moras et al. (2018), Pineda et al. (2008), Tirira (2012b), Valdez & LaVal (1971), Warner et al. (1974).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».