MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950071380 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6567830

Cynomops greenhalli G. G. Goodwin 1958

2019· article· en· W6950071380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumSexual dimorphismDorsal finForeheadForearm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

54. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat Cynomops greenhalli French: Cynomope de Greenhall / German: Greenhall-Bulldogfledermaus / Spanish: Cynomop de Greenhall Taxonomy. Cynomops greenhalli G. G. Goodwin, 1958, “Royal Botanic Gardens, Port of Spain, Trinidad.” This species is monotypic. Distribution. Known from scattered localities in lowlands of Central America, in Belize, N Honduras, Costa Rica, and Panama, and N South America, in C Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Brazilian Amazon; also Trinidad I. Descriptive notes. Head-body 54-9-78 mm, tail 24-34 mm, ear 12-5-17 mm, hindfoot 6-12 mm, forearm 33-39-7 mm; weight 10-8-23-9 g. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat shows sexual dimorphism in size, males being larger; there are also size differences acrossits distribution, with populations from west of Andes larger than those east of Andes. It is very similar to Miller’s Dogfaced Bat (C. miller). Dorsal pelage is dark chocolate-brown to light reddish brown; venteris paler, with a conspicuous even paler portion from throat to mid-venter; pelage 1s silky, but dorsal fur is not long (c. 4 mm at shoulder); dorsal hairs are bicolored, with basal one-third pale buff. Face is blackish and virtually naked. Upper lip and dorsal border of narial region is smooth. Triangular blackish ears are slightly separated from each other on forehead (space less than 4 mm). Patagium, feet, and tail are also blackish. Propatagium is narrow, and posterior plagiopatagium is inserted lateral to base of feet. There 1s dark chocolate-brown or reddish-brown fur along basal one-third of forearm and along adjacent propatagium. A patch of fur extends from posterodorsal surface of distal plagiopatagium, next to wrist, to fourth dactylopatagium. Skull has a long rostrum with anterior face oflacrimal ridge forming abrupt angle with forehead. Nasal process of premaxilla is well developed, with lateral margin of external nares straight. Incisive foramina are located relatively distant from accessory foramen. Basisphenoid pits are absent, and there is a shallow fossa on posterior squamosal bone, where posterior zygomatic arch meets braincase. Mandible is massive in males with a concave ramus along its length; P, measures at least two-thirds the height of P,. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 34 and FN = 56 or 60. Habitat. Tropical dry forests and lowland rainforests from Central America to northern South America, including the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The species is present in primary and secondary forests. Elevational range is from sea level to 975 m. Food and Feeding. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat is an aerial insectivore, and insects of the orders Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera (Formicidae) have been recorded in its diet in Costa Rica. In captivity, this species ate flying termites, while refusing a variety of other insects. Breeding. Pregnant females were recorded in June, and lactating females in April and July. Females give birth to a single young. Activity patterns. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bat has been caught early in the night, and has been trapped in mist nets set over streams or ponds and in canopy nets set 20 m high. It is known to roost in buildings and hollow trees. A colony of eight individuals was caught from the hollow branches of a yellow Poui tree (Tabebuia serratifolia, Bignoniaceae) on Trinidad. This colony occupied the tree for at least six months before it was cut down. The bats emerged from the roost regularly each evening c.15 minutes before dark. They flew fast from the roost, downward, then upward, one bat following the other at intervals of c.1 second, until six of eight were in flight. About 15-20 minutes later some bats returned to the roost. The general shape of the calls of Cynomops species are similar, with Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bats calling at the lowest frequencies (mean end frequency of low QCF calls at 17-4 kHz + 3-6 kHz SD). Movements, Home range and Social organization. Greenhall’s Dog-faced Bats roost in colonies that can comprise 50-75 individuals. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Bibliography. Bernard (2001), Eger (2008), Gardner et al. (1970), Goodwin (1958a), Goodwin & Greenhall (1961), Handley (1976), Jung et al. (2014), LaVal & Fitch (1977), Linares & Kiblisky (1969), Moras et al. (2018), Pineda et al. (2008), Tirira (2012b), Valdez & LaVal (1971), Warner et al. (1974).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→