Ganomymar zuparkoi Triapitsyn 2021, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ganomymar zuparkoi sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 81128114-729C-4B04-8C41-F73141F14184 Figs 13–15 Diagnosis Ganomymar zuparkoi is a member of the caslot species group. Female differs from the other species of this group, G. caslot, by the diagnostic features given in the key. Etymology This species is named after Robert L. Zuparko who sorted numerous interesting Mymaridae from B.L. Fisher’s project Madagascar samples at CAS and loaned them to me. Type Material Holotype MADAGASCAR • ♀ (on slide, missing one pair of wings and dissected under 4 coverslip) [Fig. 14A]; Ihorombe Region [formerly within Fianarantsoa Province], 8.0 km NE of Ivohibe; “MADG’R: Prov. Fianarantsoa 8.0 km NE Ivohibe, 22°25.3′S, 46°53.9′E 1200 m, 3–9.xi.1997, B.L. Fisher # 1753 [additional numbers crossed over]”, “sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood) montane rainforest”, “ CAS ENT 2000491 ”, “Mounted at UCR/ERM by V. V. Berezovskiy 2012 in Canada balsam”, [red] “ Ganomymar zuparkoi Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀”, “Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2012”; CAS. Paratype MADAGASCAR • 1 ♀ (on point); Haute Matsiatra Region, Andringitra National Park, 43 km South of Ambalavao; “MADAGASCAR: 43 km s Ambalauao, Rsrv. Andringintro 22 ° 14′S, 47 ° 00′E 5.X.1993 825m BLFisher#747 (1)”; CAS. Description Female (holotype) COLOR. Head very dark brown, rest of body yellow to light brown except mesopleura and gaster partially brown; antenna yellow except clava brown; legs light brown. HEAD (Fig. 14C). Slightly wider than high and 1.1 × as wide as mesosoma; face smooth, with fine, inconspicuous setae below toruli; vertex smooth; occiput with 2 pairs of setae. ANTENNA (Fig. 14B). Scape, excluding radicle, 2.9× as long as wide; pedicel smooth, longer than F1 and 1.8 × as long as wide; F5 about as long as F6, length to width ratios of funiculars: F1 = 2.6, F2 = 11.1; F3 = 7.8; F4 = 4.6; F5 = 3.1; F6 = 2.4; clava 3.2× as long as wide, almost as long as combined length of 3 preceding flagellomeres. MESOSOMA (Figs 14D, 15). Smooth, about 1.9× as long as wide; pronotum with 2 pairs of strong setae at posterior margin; axillar seta 0.045 mm long, not extending to campaniform sensilla; scutellum + frenum a little shorter than mesoscutum, scutellum almost completely divided mediolongitudinally by groove (except at posterior margin); propodeum with short, weak median carina extending from posterior margin for about one-third length. WINGS. Macropterous. Fore wing (Fig. 14E) 5.4 × as long as wide; marginal vein with 1 dorsal macrochaeta; disc slightly infumate, densely setose beyond venation, the discal setae originating behind apex of submarginal vein, with numerous round ‘cells’ beyond venation particularly conspicuous up to about 0.8 × length of wing and not visible at wing’s apex; longest marginal seta about 1.1× greatest width of wing, proximal fringe setae on anterior margin thicker than other fringe setae. Hind wing (Fig. 14E) about 42 × as long as wide; disc slightly infumate, with 2 rows of setae; longest marginal seta 7.3 × greatest width of wing. LEGS. All legs smooth, metacoxa with white setae. METASOMA. Petiole (Fig. 15) smooth, 4.7× as long as wide and slightly widened medially, a little longer than metacoxa. Ovipositor about 0.8 × length of gaster (Fig. 15), not exserted beyond its apex, about 0.9× length of mesotibia and almost 0.8 × length of metatibia. MEASUREMENTS (µm). Body (of the critical point dried specimen prior to slide-mounting) = 1040; head (of the critical point dried specimen prior to slide-mounting) = 180; mesosoma = 430; mesoscutum = 140; scutellum = 133; petiole = 157; gaster = 424; ovipositor = 354. Radicle = 27; rest of scape = 149; pedicel = 67; F1 = 39; F2 = 183; F3 = 139; F4 = 94; F5 = 75; F6 = 72; clava = 233. Fore wing = 1359:251; venation = 264; longest marginal seta = 285. Hind wing = 879:21; longest marginal seta = 154. Mesotibia = 379; metatibia = 454. Female (paratype, Fig. 13) Body length (critical point dried, point-mounted specimen) 1.09 mm. Male Unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,122 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».