Ganomymar zuparkoi Triapitsyn 2021, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ganomymar zuparkoi sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 81128114-729C-4B04-8C41-F73141F14184 Figs 13–15 Diagnosis Ganomymar zuparkoi is a member of the caslot species group. Female differs from the other species of this group, G. caslot, by the diagnostic features given in the key. Etymology This species is named after Robert L. Zuparko who sorted numerous interesting Mymaridae from B.L. Fisher’s project Madagascar samples at CAS and loaned them to me. Type Material Holotype MADAGASCAR • ♀ (on slide, missing one pair of wings and dissected under 4 coverslip) [Fig. 14A]; Ihorombe Region [formerly within Fianarantsoa Province], 8.0 km NE of Ivohibe; “MADG’R: Prov. Fianarantsoa 8.0 km NE Ivohibe, 22°25.3′S, 46°53.9′E 1200 m, 3–9.xi.1997, B.L. Fisher # 1753 [additional numbers crossed over]”, “sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood) montane rainforest”, “ CAS ENT 2000491 ”, “Mounted at UCR/ERM by V. V. Berezovskiy 2012 in Canada balsam”, [red] “ Ganomymar zuparkoi Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀”, “Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2012”; CAS. Paratype MADAGASCAR • 1 ♀ (on point); Haute Matsiatra Region, Andringitra National Park, 43 km South of Ambalavao; “MADAGASCAR: 43 km s Ambalauao, Rsrv. Andringintro 22 ° 14′S, 47 ° 00′E 5.X.1993 825m BLFisher#747 (1)”; CAS. Description Female (holotype) COLOR. Head very dark brown, rest of body yellow to light brown except mesopleura and gaster partially brown; antenna yellow except clava brown; legs light brown. HEAD (Fig. 14C). Slightly wider than high and 1.1 × as wide as mesosoma; face smooth, with fine, inconspicuous setae below toruli; vertex smooth; occiput with 2 pairs of setae. ANTENNA (Fig. 14B). Scape, excluding radicle, 2.9× as long as wide; pedicel smooth, longer than F1 and 1.8 × as long as wide; F5 about as long as F6, length to width ratios of funiculars: F1 = 2.6, F2 = 11.1; F3 = 7.8; F4 = 4.6; F5 = 3.1; F6 = 2.4; clava 3.2× as long as wide, almost as long as combined length of 3 preceding flagellomeres. MESOSOMA (Figs 14D, 15). Smooth, about 1.9× as long as wide; pronotum with 2 pairs of strong setae at posterior margin; axillar seta 0.045 mm long, not extending to campaniform sensilla; scutellum + frenum a little shorter than mesoscutum, scutellum almost completely divided mediolongitudinally by groove (except at posterior margin); propodeum with short, weak median carina extending from posterior margin for about one-third length. WINGS. Macropterous. Fore wing (Fig. 14E) 5.4 × as long as wide; marginal vein with 1 dorsal macrochaeta; disc slightly infumate, densely setose beyond venation, the discal setae originating behind apex of submarginal vein, with numerous round ‘cells’ beyond venation particularly conspicuous up to about 0.8 × length of wing and not visible at wing’s apex; longest marginal seta about 1.1× greatest width of wing, proximal fringe setae on anterior margin thicker than other fringe setae. Hind wing (Fig. 14E) about 42 × as long as wide; disc slightly infumate, with 2 rows of setae; longest marginal seta 7.3 × greatest width of wing. LEGS. All legs smooth, metacoxa with white setae. METASOMA. Petiole (Fig. 15) smooth, 4.7× as long as wide and slightly widened medially, a little longer than metacoxa. Ovipositor about 0.8 × length of gaster (Fig. 15), not exserted beyond its apex, about 0.9× length of mesotibia and almost 0.8 × length of metatibia. MEASUREMENTS (µm). Body (of the critical point dried specimen prior to slide-mounting) = 1040; head (of the critical point dried specimen prior to slide-mounting) = 180; mesosoma = 430; mesoscutum = 140; scutellum = 133; petiole = 157; gaster = 424; ovipositor = 354. Radicle = 27; rest of scape = 149; pedicel = 67; F1 = 39; F2 = 183; F3 = 139; F4 = 94; F5 = 75; F6 = 72; clava = 233. Fore wing = 1359:251; venation = 264; longest marginal seta = 285. Hind wing = 879:21; longest marginal seta = 154. Mesotibia = 379; metatibia = 454. Female (paratype, Fig. 13) Body length (critical point dried, point-mounted specimen) 1.09 mm. Male Unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".