MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950092437 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5942768

Gyrophaena aryanamensis Enushchenko 2019, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6950092437 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Leadership and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParatypeHolotypeHead (geology)RappaportAedeagusWhite (mutation)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gyrophaena aryanamensis Enushchenko, sp. nov. (Figs. 34–40) Type material examined: Holotype [The specimen was reglued on a white rectangular plate; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus, VIII male tergite and sternite in Canada balsam] ♂: ‘50. ТАДЖИКИСТАН | Шарак, в грибе | 10.V.1969. В. Янушев [50. TAJIKISTAN | Sharak [N 38°42’11.160’’, E 70°30’43.920’’, h= 1625 m], in mushroom | 10.V.1969, V.[V.] Yanushev]’ <handwritten label>, ‘ HOLOTYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2019 des.’ <red printed label>’ (ZMM). Paratypes: KYRGYZSTAN: 25 ♂♂, 13 ♀♀: ‘ KYRGYZSTAN, Dzalal- | Abad Area, Chatkalskiy | distr.[ict], Dzhany-Bazar, | 41°40,261’ N, | 70°49,053’ E, 08.VI.2016, | Palatov D.M. leg.’ <white printed labels>, ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ <red printed label>’ (ZMM: 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ZIN: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; MZHF: 2 ♂♂, ♀♀; NHMW: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; FMNH: 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; cIE: 13 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀); TAJIKISTAN: Kuhistoni Badakhshon Area: 4 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀ [The specimens was reglued on a white rectangular plate; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus in Canada balsam; labels scanned and printed]: same data as the holotype, ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2019 des.’ <red printed label>’ (ZMM: ♂, 2 ♀♀; ZIN: ♂, ♀♀; NHMW: ♂, 2 ♀♀; cIE: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀). Description. Body somewhat subparallel, yellow-brown to dark-brown; body length 1.86–2.28 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 34. Head dark-brown to black; pronotum slightly paler than head, red-brown to dark-brown; disc of elytra golden-brown with shoulders and posterolateral portions dark-brown to black; abdomen dark-brown or yellowbrown to red-brown except of abdominal segments V–VI dark-brown to black; antennomeres 1–3 yellow-brown, remaining antennomeres darkish-brown; mouthparts brown; legs yellow-brown to red-brown. Body with distinct reticulate microsculpture. Head 1.3 times as wide as long, with distinct reticulate microsculpture and groups of large (about 0.02 mm diam.), distinct punctures in lateroposterior portions of head behind eyes; middle portion impunctate. Antennomeres 1–3 elongate, antennomere 4 trapezoidal to subquadrate, antennomeres 5–10 slightly transverse, 1.5 times as wide as long; apical antennomere elliptic to ovoid, 1.2 times as long as wide. Pronotum with distinctly narrowing anterior angles, 1.5 times as wide as long and 1.35 times as wide as head; microsculpture as that on head, with numerous small (about 0.01 mm diam.) and scattered punctures, not forming longitudinal rows, and two large (0.03 mm diam.) median punctures near base of head; basal portion of pronotum with weakly defined punctation. Elytra about twice as wide as long, 1.3 times as wide as pronotum, with distinct reticulate microsculpture; each elytron with oblique rows of tubercles (distance between each of them 0.01–0.04 mm) stretching from posterior angles to shoulders; median area without tubercles. Microsculpture of abdomen distinctly weaker than on other parts of body. Male. Abdominal tergite VII with two round median tubercles and longer, almost parallel, elongated lateral elevations from each sides of median tubercles. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII with four teeth rather equal in length: two widely separated, stout and slightly curved inwards lateral teeth and two moderately small, straight medial teeth (Fig. 38); sometimes one of them may be reduced as in Fig. 36. Ventral plate of aedeagus rather short, wide and blunt apically, with somewhat long and curved apical projection; lower edge of ventral plate distinctly angled (Figs. 35, 37); dorsal projection of internal sac approximately as long as ventral plate, bent dorsally, regularly elongate and sharply widening to apex. Female. Surface of abdominal tergite VII rather flat, with several small round tubercles along apical margin; tergite VIII truncate apically, rather narrowly trapezoid (Fig. 39); sternite VIII rather narrowly rounded, more or less ovoid apically (Fig. 40). Comparative notes. In the coloration and microsculpture of the body, the general shape of the aedeagus, and the male abdominal tergite VIII, G. aryanamensis sp.nov. is similar to G. hochhuthi Bernhauer 1908 (Figs. 41–49), from which it can be distinguished by the irregular punctation of the pronotum (punctures on the pronotum of G. hochhuthi forming longitudinal rows), features of the elytral microsculpture, details of the structure of the aedeagus and the shape of the male abdominal tergite VIII (see the key below). Based on the shapes of the antennomeres, the arrangement of pronotal and elytral punctures and microsculpture, as wel1 as on the structure of the aedeagus and the male tergite VIII, G. aryanamensis sp. nov. belongs to the laetula species group, established by Seevers (1951). This Holarctic group contains the North American G. laetula Casey 1906 and six Euroasiatic species: G. congrua, G. hanseni A. Strand 1946, G. hochhuthi, G. minima Erichson 1837, G. munsteri A. Strand 1935 and G. poweri Crotch 1865. For illustration of these species see Klimaszewski et al. (2009: Figs. 46 –52) and Enushchenko & Semenov (2016: Figs. 11–14, 21–24, 40–42, 43–45, 55–57). Etymology. The name is derived from ‘ Aryânam Vaeja ’ (ancient Iranian ‘ aryanam ’ and Avesta ‘ airyanam ’ (Aryan land)), as ancestors of native Tajiks called their country. Remark. It was collected in Kyrgyzstan (Dzhany Bazar) in mushrooms together with G. hochhuthi.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,902
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0600,058

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEducational Leadership and PracticesTravaux en français237 207