MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950092437 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5942768

Gyrophaena aryanamensis Enushchenko 2019, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6950092437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParatypeHolotypeHead (geology)RappaportAedeagusWhite (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gyrophaena aryanamensis Enushchenko, sp. nov. (Figs. 34–40) Type material examined: Holotype [The specimen was reglued on a white rectangular plate; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus, VIII male tergite and sternite in Canada balsam] ♂: ‘50. ТАДЖИКИСТАН | Шарак, в грибе | 10.V.1969. В. Янушев [50. TAJIKISTAN | Sharak [N 38°42’11.160’’, E 70°30’43.920’’, h= 1625 m], in mushroom | 10.V.1969, V.[V.] Yanushev]’ , ‘ HOLOTYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2019 des.’ ’ (ZMM). Paratypes: KYRGYZSTAN: 25 ♂♂, 13 ♀♀: ‘ KYRGYZSTAN, Dzalal- | Abad Area, Chatkalskiy | distr.[ict], Dzhany-Bazar, | 41°40,261’ N, | 70°49,053’ E, 08.VI.2016, | Palatov D.M. leg.’ , ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ ’ (ZMM: 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ZIN: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; MZHF: 2 ♂♂, ♀♀; NHMW: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; FMNH: 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; cIE: 13 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀); TAJIKISTAN: Kuhistoni Badakhshon Area: 4 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀ [The specimens was reglued on a white rectangular plate; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus in Canada balsam; labels scanned and printed]: same data as the holotype, ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | aryanamensis sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2019 des.’ ’ (ZMM: ♂, 2 ♀♀; ZIN: ♂, ♀♀; NHMW: ♂, 2 ♀♀; cIE: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀). Description. Body somewhat subparallel, yellow-brown to dark-brown; body length 1.86–2.28 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 34. Head dark-brown to black; pronotum slightly paler than head, red-brown to dark-brown; disc of elytra golden-brown with shoulders and posterolateral portions dark-brown to black; abdomen dark-brown or yellowbrown to red-brown except of abdominal segments V–VI dark-brown to black; antennomeres 1–3 yellow-brown, remaining antennomeres darkish-brown; mouthparts brown; legs yellow-brown to red-brown. Body with distinct reticulate microsculpture. Head 1.3 times as wide as long, with distinct reticulate microsculpture and groups of large (about 0.02 mm diam.), distinct punctures in lateroposterior portions of head behind eyes; middle portion impunctate. Antennomeres 1–3 elongate, antennomere 4 trapezoidal to subquadrate, antennomeres 5–10 slightly transverse, 1.5 times as wide as long; apical antennomere elliptic to ovoid, 1.2 times as long as wide. Pronotum with distinctly narrowing anterior angles, 1.5 times as wide as long and 1.35 times as wide as head; microsculpture as that on head, with numerous small (about 0.01 mm diam.) and scattered punctures, not forming longitudinal rows, and two large (0.03 mm diam.) median punctures near base of head; basal portion of pronotum with weakly defined punctation. Elytra about twice as wide as long, 1.3 times as wide as pronotum, with distinct reticulate microsculpture; each elytron with oblique rows of tubercles (distance between each of them 0.01–0.04 mm) stretching from posterior angles to shoulders; median area without tubercles. Microsculpture of abdomen distinctly weaker than on other parts of body. Male. Abdominal tergite VII with two round median tubercles and longer, almost parallel, elongated lateral elevations from each sides of median tubercles. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII with four teeth rather equal in length: two widely separated, stout and slightly curved inwards lateral teeth and two moderately small, straight medial teeth (Fig. 38); sometimes one of them may be reduced as in Fig. 36. Ventral plate of aedeagus rather short, wide and blunt apically, with somewhat long and curved apical projection; lower edge of ventral plate distinctly angled (Figs. 35, 37); dorsal projection of internal sac approximately as long as ventral plate, bent dorsally, regularly elongate and sharply widening to apex. Female. Surface of abdominal tergite VII rather flat, with several small round tubercles along apical margin; tergite VIII truncate apically, rather narrowly trapezoid (Fig. 39); sternite VIII rather narrowly rounded, more or less ovoid apically (Fig. 40). Comparative notes. In the coloration and microsculpture of the body, the general shape of the aedeagus, and the male abdominal tergite VIII, G. aryanamensis sp.nov. is similar to G. hochhuthi Bernhauer 1908 (Figs. 41–49), from which it can be distinguished by the irregular punctation of the pronotum (punctures on the pronotum of G. hochhuthi forming longitudinal rows), features of the elytral microsculpture, details of the structure of the aedeagus and the shape of the male abdominal tergite VIII (see the key below). Based on the shapes of the antennomeres, the arrangement of pronotal and elytral punctures and microsculpture, as wel1 as on the structure of the aedeagus and the male tergite VIII, G. aryanamensis sp. nov. belongs to the laetula species group, established by Seevers (1951). This Holarctic group contains the North American G. laetula Casey 1906 and six Euroasiatic species: G. congrua, G. hanseni A. Strand 1946, G. hochhuthi, G. minima Erichson 1837, G. munsteri A. Strand 1935 and G. poweri Crotch 1865. For illustration of these species see Klimaszewski et al. (2009: Figs. 46 –52) and Enushchenko & Semenov (2016: Figs. 11–14, 21–24, 40–42, 43–45, 55–57). Etymology. The name is derived from ‘ Aryânam Vaeja ’ (ancient Iranian ‘ aryanam ’ and Avesta ‘ airyanam ’ (Aryan land)), as ancestors of native Tajiks called their country. Remark. It was collected in Kyrgyzstan (Dzhany Bazar) in mushrooms together with G. hochhuthi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEducational Leadership and PracticesFrench-language works237,207