Aegomorphus quadrigibbus Santos-Silva & Botero & Wappes 2020
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aegomorphus quadrigibbus (Say, 1831)(Figs. 101-109) Acanthocinus quadrigibbus Say, 1831: 9, 1835: 195; LeConte, 1859: 665. Acanthoderes quadrigibbus; Haldeman, 1847: 45; LeConte, 1852: 175; Melsheimer, 1853: 107 (cat.); Bland, 1861: 97 (distr.); LeConte, 1873: 337, 1880: 237 (hosts); Packard, 1881: 55, 75, 131 (biol.); LeConte & Horn, 1883: 322; Shufeldt, 1884: 334, 338 (distr.); Townsend, 1884: 222; Harrington, 1884: 48 (hosts); Townsend, 1885: 70 (distr.); Chittenden, 1894: 99 (hosts); Knobel, 1895: 34; Hamilton, 1895: 339 (distr.); Leng & Hamilton, 1896: 114; Wickham, 1897: 206; Harrington, 1897: 74 (hosts); Smith, 1900: 294 (distr.); Dury, 1902: 162 (distr.); Ulke, 1903: 26 (distr.); Felt, 1906: 702, 715 (biol.); Smith, 1910: 333; Blatchley, 1910: 1070; Fisher & Kirk, 1912: 314 (distr.); Johnson, 1915: 315 (distr.); Nicolay, 1919: 70 (distr.); Craighead, 1923: 113 (larva); Turnbow & Franklin, 1980: 344 (distr.). Psapharochrus quadrigibbus; Lacordaire, 1872: 751; Casey, 1913: 301; Champlain et al., 1925: 140 (hosts); Kirk & Knull, 1926: 42 (distr.); Leonard, 1928: 451 (distr.); Beaulne, 1932: 219 (hosts); Pechuman, 1937: 12 (biol.); Brimley, 1938: 217; Kaston, 1938: 239 (biol.); Hoffman, 1942: 11; Knull, 1944: 92 (distr.); Beal & Massey, 1945: 148 (biol.); Loding, 1945: 122 (distr.); Knull, 1946: 243; Fattig, 1947: 33 (distr.); Jaques, 1951: 267; Alexander, 1958: 49 (distr.); Solomon et al., 1976: 290; Monné, 2005: 211 (cat.). Acanthoderes quadrigibba; Gemminger, 1873: 3146 (cat.); Horn, 1880: 115; Franz, 1954: 226 (distr.); Duffy, 1960: 214 (larva, biol.); Gilmour, 1965: 613 (cat.); Zajciw, 1969b: 609 (distr.); Perrault, 1978: 380 (distr.); Rice & Enns,1981:92 (distr.,hosts); Chemsak & Hovore, 2002b: 12; Hernández-Fuentes et al., 2018: 544 (distr.; host). Acanthoderes (Acanthoderes) quadrigibba; Swift et al., 2010: 45 (distr.); Maes et al., 2010: 319 (distr.); Audureau, 2010: 8 (distr.); Holt, 2013: 252 (distr.); Klingeman et al., 2017: 298 (distr.); Audureau & Roguet, 2018: 76 (distr.); Monné, 2019: 222 (cat.). Acanthoderes 4-gibbus; Riley, 1880: 270 (hosts); Packard, 1890: 91, 221, 291, 520 (biol.); Caulfield, 1890: 66 (hosts); Beutenmuller, 1896: 78 (hosts). Aegomorphus quadrigibbus; Linsley & Chemsak,1985:246 (syn.); Hovore et al., 1987: 316 (distr.); Chemsak et al., 1992: 131 (checklist); Lingafelter & Horner, 1993: 183 (distr.); MacRae, 1993: 244 (distr.); Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 35 (checklist); Monné, 1994: 35 (cat.); Yanega, 1996: 133; Noguera & Chemsak, 1996: 406 (distr.); Linsley & Chemsak, 1997: 339 (hosts); Peck & Thomas, 1998: 122 (distr.); Schiefer, 1998: 125 (distr.); Monné, 2001: 39 (cat. hosts); Vlasak & Vlasakova, 2002: 214 (hosts). Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus) quadrigibba; Aurivillius, 1923: 387 (cat.). Psapharochrus quadrigibbus lucidus Knull, 1958: 282; Chemsak, 1977: 178 (type). Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus) quadrigibba lucidus; Gilmour, 1965: 613 (cat.). Although originally described in Acanthocinus by Say, 1831 and moved to Acanthoderes by Haldeman (1847) it was Lacordaire (1872) who finally transferred Acanthoderes quadrigibbus to Psapharochrus, affirming that this latter genus included most of the species allocated in Acanthoderes at that time. Curiously, the species continued to be quoted as being in Acanthoderes, and it was Casey (1913) who finally correctly listed it again in Psapharochrus. Even so, the species continued to be mentioned as belonging to Acanthoderes, until Aurivillius (1923) moved Psapharochrus to the status of a subgenus of Acanthoderes and included A. quadrigibba in it. From Aurivillius (1923) to Rice & Enns (1981) the species was mentioned in Psapharochrus (as a distinct genus) or in Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus). More recently, Linsley & Chemsak (1985) transferred the species to Aegomorphus, but only because of their doubts: “Since the species of Acanthoderes sensu latu are extremely numerous the question of generic or subgeneric assignments is difficult and beyond the scope of this work… We are assigning our five species of ‘Acanthoderes’ to Aegomorphus Haldeman until the problem can be resolved for the entire group.” Finally, Chemsak & Hovore (2002b) transferred Aegomorphus quadrigibbus to Acanthoderes. The thinking behind what these authors were trying to do is somewhat mysterious, since they reported: “We have used the name Acanthoderes herein for placement of taxa which possess most of the characters of Acanthoderes varia and Aegomorphus decipiens, and which fit within the existing parameters of the genus sensu latu, without assignment to subgenera.” We do not know for sure what “ Acanthoderes varia ” is, but it is likely Cerambyx varius Fabricius, 1787 (currently equal to Cerambyx clavipes Schrank, 1781, and placed in Aegomorphus). As Aegomorphus decipiens is the type species of Aegomorphus, this affirmation may have indicated their view that it was closely related to Acanthoderes. For sure, it was a transference based on doubts, and not on justified or definable features. Acanthocinus quadrigibbus Say, 1831 has the eyes coarsely faceted, and pronotum not distinctly depressed centrally. Accordingly, it belongs to and is hereby transferred to Aegomorphus. As correctly reported by Chemsak & Hovore (2002b) for this species “the variation within and be- tween samples is considerable.” The elytral pubescence (Figs. 101, 106-109) is extremely variable in concentration, but much less so in position of the maculae, and although the anterior light pubescent macula of the elytra is from slightly distinct to well-marked its placement on the elytra remains the same. Material examined: MEXICO, Guerrero: Hwy 200, 51 km NE Ixtapa, 6 males, 4 females, 18-21.VII.1985, Wappes col. (ACMT); 1 female, 17-20.VII.1985, Wappes col. (ACMT). Quintana Roo (new state record): Hwy 307, 5 km S Cancun A.P., 1 male, 09.VI.2005, Skillman Jr. col. (FWSC); 1-5 km S Cancun, 1 male, 04.VI.2009, Skillman & Hildebrant col. (FWSC). Veracruz: Laguna Catemaco, 1 male, 24-25.V.1969, J.E.H. Martin col. (MZSP); 1 male, 09.VI.1969, J.E.H. Martin col. (MZSP); 1 male, 25.VI.1969, Bright & Campbell col. (MZSP); 1 male, 08-16.VIII.1969, H.F. Howden col. (MZSP). GUATEMALA (new country record): Baja Verapaz: CA14, km 149-151, 1 male, 2 females, 25.VII.2008, Skillman and C. & L. O’Brien col. (FWSC). Known geographical distribution (Monné, 2019; Tavakilian & Chevillotte, 2019; new records): Canada, Eastern United States to Florida and Texas, Mexico (Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco, Yucatán, Nayarit, Quintana Roo), Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,153 | 0,048 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».