Aegomorphus quadrigibbus Santos-Silva & Botero & Wappes 2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aegomorphus quadrigibbus (Say, 1831)(Figs. 101-109) Acanthocinus quadrigibbus Say, 1831: 9, 1835: 195; LeConte, 1859: 665. Acanthoderes quadrigibbus; Haldeman, 1847: 45; LeConte, 1852: 175; Melsheimer, 1853: 107 (cat.); Bland, 1861: 97 (distr.); LeConte, 1873: 337, 1880: 237 (hosts); Packard, 1881: 55, 75, 131 (biol.); LeConte & Horn, 1883: 322; Shufeldt, 1884: 334, 338 (distr.); Townsend, 1884: 222; Harrington, 1884: 48 (hosts); Townsend, 1885: 70 (distr.); Chittenden, 1894: 99 (hosts); Knobel, 1895: 34; Hamilton, 1895: 339 (distr.); Leng & Hamilton, 1896: 114; Wickham, 1897: 206; Harrington, 1897: 74 (hosts); Smith, 1900: 294 (distr.); Dury, 1902: 162 (distr.); Ulke, 1903: 26 (distr.); Felt, 1906: 702, 715 (biol.); Smith, 1910: 333; Blatchley, 1910: 1070; Fisher & Kirk, 1912: 314 (distr.); Johnson, 1915: 315 (distr.); Nicolay, 1919: 70 (distr.); Craighead, 1923: 113 (larva); Turnbow & Franklin, 1980: 344 (distr.). Psapharochrus quadrigibbus; Lacordaire, 1872: 751; Casey, 1913: 301; Champlain et al., 1925: 140 (hosts); Kirk & Knull, 1926: 42 (distr.); Leonard, 1928: 451 (distr.); Beaulne, 1932: 219 (hosts); Pechuman, 1937: 12 (biol.); Brimley, 1938: 217; Kaston, 1938: 239 (biol.); Hoffman, 1942: 11; Knull, 1944: 92 (distr.); Beal & Massey, 1945: 148 (biol.); Loding, 1945: 122 (distr.); Knull, 1946: 243; Fattig, 1947: 33 (distr.); Jaques, 1951: 267; Alexander, 1958: 49 (distr.); Solomon et al., 1976: 290; Monné, 2005: 211 (cat.). Acanthoderes quadrigibba; Gemminger, 1873: 3146 (cat.); Horn, 1880: 115; Franz, 1954: 226 (distr.); Duffy, 1960: 214 (larva, biol.); Gilmour, 1965: 613 (cat.); Zajciw, 1969b: 609 (distr.); Perrault, 1978: 380 (distr.); Rice & Enns,1981:92 (distr.,hosts); Chemsak & Hovore, 2002b: 12; Hernández-Fuentes et al., 2018: 544 (distr.; host). Acanthoderes (Acanthoderes) quadrigibba; Swift et al., 2010: 45 (distr.); Maes et al., 2010: 319 (distr.); Audureau, 2010: 8 (distr.); Holt, 2013: 252 (distr.); Klingeman et al., 2017: 298 (distr.); Audureau & Roguet, 2018: 76 (distr.); Monné, 2019: 222 (cat.). Acanthoderes 4-gibbus; Riley, 1880: 270 (hosts); Packard, 1890: 91, 221, 291, 520 (biol.); Caulfield, 1890: 66 (hosts); Beutenmuller, 1896: 78 (hosts). Aegomorphus quadrigibbus; Linsley & Chemsak,1985:246 (syn.); Hovore et al., 1987: 316 (distr.); Chemsak et al., 1992: 131 (checklist); Lingafelter & Horner, 1993: 183 (distr.); MacRae, 1993: 244 (distr.); Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 35 (checklist); Monné, 1994: 35 (cat.); Yanega, 1996: 133; Noguera & Chemsak, 1996: 406 (distr.); Linsley & Chemsak, 1997: 339 (hosts); Peck & Thomas, 1998: 122 (distr.); Schiefer, 1998: 125 (distr.); Monné, 2001: 39 (cat. hosts); Vlasak & Vlasakova, 2002: 214 (hosts). Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus) quadrigibba; Aurivillius, 1923: 387 (cat.). Psapharochrus quadrigibbus lucidus Knull, 1958: 282; Chemsak, 1977: 178 (type). Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus) quadrigibba lucidus; Gilmour, 1965: 613 (cat.). Although originally described in Acanthocinus by Say, 1831 and moved to Acanthoderes by Haldeman (1847) it was Lacordaire (1872) who finally transferred Acanthoderes quadrigibbus to Psapharochrus, affirming that this latter genus included most of the species allocated in Acanthoderes at that time. Curiously, the species continued to be quoted as being in Acanthoderes, and it was Casey (1913) who finally correctly listed it again in Psapharochrus. Even so, the species continued to be mentioned as belonging to Acanthoderes, until Aurivillius (1923) moved Psapharochrus to the status of a subgenus of Acanthoderes and included A. quadrigibba in it. From Aurivillius (1923) to Rice & Enns (1981) the species was mentioned in Psapharochrus (as a distinct genus) or in Acanthoderes (Psapharochrus). More recently, Linsley & Chemsak (1985) transferred the species to Aegomorphus, but only because of their doubts: “Since the species of Acanthoderes sensu latu are extremely numerous the question of generic or subgeneric assignments is difficult and beyond the scope of this work… We are assigning our five species of ‘Acanthoderes’ to Aegomorphus Haldeman until the problem can be resolved for the entire group.” Finally, Chemsak & Hovore (2002b) transferred Aegomorphus quadrigibbus to Acanthoderes. The thinking behind what these authors were trying to do is somewhat mysterious, since they reported: “We have used the name Acanthoderes herein for placement of taxa which possess most of the characters of Acanthoderes varia and Aegomorphus decipiens, and which fit within the existing parameters of the genus sensu latu, without assignment to subgenera.” We do not know for sure what “ Acanthoderes varia ” is, but it is likely Cerambyx varius Fabricius, 1787 (currently equal to Cerambyx clavipes Schrank, 1781, and placed in Aegomorphus). As Aegomorphus decipiens is the type species of Aegomorphus, this affirmation may have indicated their view that it was closely related to Acanthoderes. For sure, it was a transference based on doubts, and not on justified or definable features. Acanthocinus quadrigibbus Say, 1831 has the eyes coarsely faceted, and pronotum not distinctly depressed centrally. Accordingly, it belongs to and is hereby transferred to Aegomorphus. As correctly reported by Chemsak & Hovore (2002b) for this species “the variation within and be- tween samples is considerable.” The elytral pubescence (Figs. 101, 106-109) is extremely variable in concentration, but much less so in position of the maculae, and although the anterior light pubescent macula of the elytra is from slightly distinct to well-marked its placement on the elytra remains the same. Material examined: MEXICO, Guerrero: Hwy 200, 51 km NE Ixtapa, 6 males, 4 females, 18-21.VII.1985, Wappes col. (ACMT); 1 female, 17-20.VII.1985, Wappes col. (ACMT). Quintana Roo (new state record): Hwy 307, 5 km S Cancun A.P., 1 male, 09.VI.2005, Skillman Jr. col. (FWSC); 1-5 km S Cancun, 1 male, 04.VI.2009, Skillman & Hildebrant col. (FWSC). Veracruz: Laguna Catemaco, 1 male, 24-25.V.1969, J.E.H. Martin col. (MZSP); 1 male, 09.VI.1969, J.E.H. Martin col. (MZSP); 1 male, 25.VI.1969, Bright & Campbell col. (MZSP); 1 male, 08-16.VIII.1969, H.F. Howden col. (MZSP). GUATEMALA (new country record): Baja Verapaz: CA14, km 149-151, 1 male, 2 females, 25.VII.2008, Skillman and C. & L. O’Brien col. (FWSC). Known geographical distribution (Monné, 2019; Tavakilian & Chevillotte, 2019; new records): Canada, Eastern United States to Florida and Texas, Mexico (Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco, Yucatán, Nayarit, Quintana Roo), Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".