MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950293744 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6954626

Doratura stylata

2022· article· en· W6950293744 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésApex (geometry)AedeagusVertex (graph theory)Sagittal planeSetaMedian plane

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Doratura stylata (Boheman, 1847) (Figs 2A; 3A; 4A; 5A–D; 6A–H; 9A; 10A–G; 11A–C; 12A–D; 19A) Athysanus stylata Boheman, 1847: 31 Iassus stylatus: Walker, F., 1851: 891 Jassus stylatus: Dohrn, F., 1859: 87 Jassus (Athysanus) stylatus: Flor, 1861: 273 Doratura stylata: Sahlberg, J., 1871: 292 Doratura stylata var. macroptera Kusnezov, 1928a: 47 Doratura (Doratura) stylata: Emeljanov, 1964: 403 Diagnosis. This species has an almost completely smooth aedeagus (generally, but not always, there are tiny spinules on its medio-ventral area) with a proximal shield like base (Figs 10A–G), geniculate styles (Figs 11A–C) with long apical portion of apophyse and needle-shaped tip, pygofer (Fig. 3A) with generally 3–4 macrosetae, connective (Fig. 2A) with branched part longer than basal portion and rounded bifurcation, and the female pregenital sternite with straight hind margin, in most cases with the median portion slightly protruding caudad (Fig. 19A). In all these characters, the species displays a distinct affinity to D. exilis and D. impudica. From the first species it can be distinguished by its proportionally longer fore wings and in many cases by its different coloration with fore wings with green tinge and different pattern of markings on vertex and pronotum (see below), from the latter by the proportionally shorter hind tibiae, in most cases from both species by its slightly scabrous medio-ventral margin of aedeagus. The nymphs (Fig. 9A) display a dark abdomen with light areas laterally on tergite V and VI (often confluent to a continuous transverse light band) and in the sagittal line of the apex (in D. exilis abdomen with longitudinal dark stripes, in D. impudica without markings) (see Stöckmann et al. 2013). Distribution (Figs 53, 56, 57). In Italy, we found this species at many sites from Friuli-Venezia Giulia until Calabria. We studied material also from Piedmont and Veneto. Remane & Hellrigl (1996) record the species from Alto Adige, Servadei (1973) from Lombardy. Doratura stylata is apparently not present in Sardinia and Sicily. Outside of Italy, D. stylata has a vast distribution in most parts of the Palearctic region (Metcalf, 1967; Nast, 1972, 1987), and is present in the Nearctic region as well (apparently introduced, see Hamilton, 1983). We examined material from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Montenegro, Romania, Russia (Altai), Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Tunisia (a series of specimens collected by O. Schmiedeknecht and published by Melichar, 1899), Turkey, Ukraine, and Canada. In addition, there are records from Algeria (Oshanin, 1906); Belarus (Borodin, 2004); Belgium (Van Stalle, 1989); China: Beijing, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Shandong, Xinjiang (Duan & Zhang, 2012); Denmark (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Estonia (Söderman et al., 2009); Finland (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Georgia (Dlabola, 1958); Greece (Drosopoulos et al., 1986); Great Britain (Le Quesne, 1969); Hungary (Győrffy et al., 2009); Iran: East Azerbaijan Province (Abdollahi et al., 2015); Kyrgyzstan (Novikov et al., 2006); Latvia (Vilbaste, 1974); Lithuania (Vilbaste, 1974); Luxembourg (Niedringhaus et al., 2010); Netherlands (Reclaire, 1944); Norway (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Poland (Dworakowska, 1968); Portugal (Quartau & Duarte Rodrigues, 1969); Russia: European part (Emeljanov, 1964), Maritime Territory (Vilbaste, 1968), Siberia (Anufriev, 2016); Sweden (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Switzerland (Mühlethaler et al., 2017); Turkey: Anatolia (Kalkandelen, 1974), Black Sea (Zeybekoğlu, 1998); Uzbekistan (Dubovsky, 1965); United States (Hamilton, 1983). Records of D. stylata for “North Africa” by Holgersen (1944), and later by Ossiannilsson (1951) and Ribaut (1952) are apparently based on former records for Tunisia and Algeria (for example Oshanin, 1906). (A generic record like “North Africa” is sometimes documented as if concerning each single country belonging to North Africa, and in consequence the species is recorded for every country from West Sahara to Sudan, even though no records exist for most of these countries). Remarks. Ribaut (1952) indicates as a diagnostic character of D. stylata the “papilleuse” ventral side of the aedeagus (Fig. 10C). Dworakowska (1968) observed a distinct variability in this character. Indeed, in Italy and in Germany, D. stylata specimens with a completely smooth aedeagus are observed (Fig. 10B). We never found, however, a “papilleuse” ventral aedeagus side in D. exilis or D. impudica. Thus, among these three species, the presence of this structure of the aedeagus surface is a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the identification of a specimen as D. stylata. Ecology. In Italy, our lowest collection sites are at about 250 m in Piedmont and 400 m in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, at 450 m in the Northern Apennines, at 800 m in the Central Apennines and at 1300 m in the Southern Apennines. Most of the localities are at medium and high altitude between 1000–1800 m, sometimes up to more than 2000 m. On the Balkan Peninsula the species is equally distributed from lowland sites until at least 2000 m. The habitats are open areas, in the Northern Apennines also dry riverbeds, but normally moderately dry open pastures and dry to slightly humid meadows. The host plants belong apparently to several genera of fine leaved grasses, for instance Festuca, Agrostis, Poa and Nardus. In particular, Festuca ovina, F. rubra and Agrostis capillaris are recorded (Nickel, 2003). Phenology. We collected this species from the beginning of June until the middle of September; in the literature it is recorded also in May and October (Nickel, 2003). At low altitude, it may have two generations, in mountain regions only one.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,592
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2050,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityTravaux en français237 207