MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950293744 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6954626

Doratura stylata

2022· article· en· W6950293744 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)AedeagusVertex (graph theory)Sagittal planeSetaMedian plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doratura stylata (Boheman, 1847) (Figs 2A; 3A; 4A; 5A–D; 6A–H; 9A; 10A–G; 11A–C; 12A–D; 19A) Athysanus stylata Boheman, 1847: 31 Iassus stylatus: Walker, F., 1851: 891 Jassus stylatus: Dohrn, F., 1859: 87 Jassus (Athysanus) stylatus: Flor, 1861: 273 Doratura stylata: Sahlberg, J., 1871: 292 Doratura stylata var. macroptera Kusnezov, 1928a: 47 Doratura (Doratura) stylata: Emeljanov, 1964: 403 Diagnosis. This species has an almost completely smooth aedeagus (generally, but not always, there are tiny spinules on its medio-ventral area) with a proximal shield like base (Figs 10A–G), geniculate styles (Figs 11A–C) with long apical portion of apophyse and needle-shaped tip, pygofer (Fig. 3A) with generally 3–4 macrosetae, connective (Fig. 2A) with branched part longer than basal portion and rounded bifurcation, and the female pregenital sternite with straight hind margin, in most cases with the median portion slightly protruding caudad (Fig. 19A). In all these characters, the species displays a distinct affinity to D. exilis and D. impudica. From the first species it can be distinguished by its proportionally longer fore wings and in many cases by its different coloration with fore wings with green tinge and different pattern of markings on vertex and pronotum (see below), from the latter by the proportionally shorter hind tibiae, in most cases from both species by its slightly scabrous medio-ventral margin of aedeagus. The nymphs (Fig. 9A) display a dark abdomen with light areas laterally on tergite V and VI (often confluent to a continuous transverse light band) and in the sagittal line of the apex (in D. exilis abdomen with longitudinal dark stripes, in D. impudica without markings) (see Stöckmann et al. 2013). Distribution (Figs 53, 56, 57). In Italy, we found this species at many sites from Friuli-Venezia Giulia until Calabria. We studied material also from Piedmont and Veneto. Remane & Hellrigl (1996) record the species from Alto Adige, Servadei (1973) from Lombardy. Doratura stylata is apparently not present in Sardinia and Sicily. Outside of Italy, D. stylata has a vast distribution in most parts of the Palearctic region (Metcalf, 1967; Nast, 1972, 1987), and is present in the Nearctic region as well (apparently introduced, see Hamilton, 1983). We examined material from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Montenegro, Romania, Russia (Altai), Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Tunisia (a series of specimens collected by O. Schmiedeknecht and published by Melichar, 1899), Turkey, Ukraine, and Canada. In addition, there are records from Algeria (Oshanin, 1906); Belarus (Borodin, 2004); Belgium (Van Stalle, 1989); China: Beijing, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Shandong, Xinjiang (Duan & Zhang, 2012); Denmark (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Estonia (Söderman et al., 2009); Finland (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Georgia (Dlabola, 1958); Greece (Drosopoulos et al., 1986); Great Britain (Le Quesne, 1969); Hungary (Győrffy et al., 2009); Iran: East Azerbaijan Province (Abdollahi et al., 2015); Kyrgyzstan (Novikov et al., 2006); Latvia (Vilbaste, 1974); Lithuania (Vilbaste, 1974); Luxembourg (Niedringhaus et al., 2010); Netherlands (Reclaire, 1944); Norway (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Poland (Dworakowska, 1968); Portugal (Quartau & Duarte Rodrigues, 1969); Russia: European part (Emeljanov, 1964), Maritime Territory (Vilbaste, 1968), Siberia (Anufriev, 2016); Sweden (Ossiannilsson, 1983); Switzerland (Mühlethaler et al., 2017); Turkey: Anatolia (Kalkandelen, 1974), Black Sea (Zeybekoğlu, 1998); Uzbekistan (Dubovsky, 1965); United States (Hamilton, 1983). Records of D. stylata for “North Africa” by Holgersen (1944), and later by Ossiannilsson (1951) and Ribaut (1952) are apparently based on former records for Tunisia and Algeria (for example Oshanin, 1906). (A generic record like “North Africa” is sometimes documented as if concerning each single country belonging to North Africa, and in consequence the species is recorded for every country from West Sahara to Sudan, even though no records exist for most of these countries). Remarks. Ribaut (1952) indicates as a diagnostic character of D. stylata the “papilleuse” ventral side of the aedeagus (Fig. 10C). Dworakowska (1968) observed a distinct variability in this character. Indeed, in Italy and in Germany, D. stylata specimens with a completely smooth aedeagus are observed (Fig. 10B). We never found, however, a “papilleuse” ventral aedeagus side in D. exilis or D. impudica. Thus, among these three species, the presence of this structure of the aedeagus surface is a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the identification of a specimen as D. stylata. Ecology. In Italy, our lowest collection sites are at about 250 m in Piedmont and 400 m in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, at 450 m in the Northern Apennines, at 800 m in the Central Apennines and at 1300 m in the Southern Apennines. Most of the localities are at medium and high altitude between 1000–1800 m, sometimes up to more than 2000 m. On the Balkan Peninsula the species is equally distributed from lowland sites until at least 2000 m. The habitats are open areas, in the Northern Apennines also dry riverbeds, but normally moderately dry open pastures and dry to slightly humid meadows. The host plants belong apparently to several genera of fine leaved grasses, for instance Festuca, Agrostis, Poa and Nardus. In particular, Festuca ovina, F. rubra and Agrostis capillaris are recorded (Nickel, 2003). Phenology. We collected this species from the beginning of June until the middle of September; in the literature it is recorded also in May and October (Nickel, 2003). At low altitude, it may have two generations, in mountain regions only one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2050.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityFrench-language works237,207