MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6950310873 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6010345

Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn, sp. n.

2017· article· en· W6950310873 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeSimple eye in invertebratesScapeWingSternum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn, sp. n. (Figs 1–8) Type material. Holotype female on slide (Fig. 1), deposited in UCRC, labeled: 1. “ Côte d'Ivoire: Lagunes District Grand-Lahou Department, Yaokro 5°09'54''N 5°09'50''W, 8 m Collected 12.ii. 2017, emerged 17.ii.2017, K. E. Kwadjo, from eggs of Nedotepa curta Dmitriev ”; 2. “ Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2017 in Canada Balsam”; 3. [magenta] “ Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀ ”; 4. “dry body length ca. 0.6 mm Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2017”; 5. [database barcode label] “ UCRC UCRC _ ENT 00407585 ”. The holotype is mounted dorsoventrally and lacking one pair of wings. Paratypes, same data: 2 ♀ and 1 ♂ on slides [CNC (1 ♀) and UCRC (1 ♀ and 1 ♂)], as well as 2 ♀ and 1 ♂ on points [UCRC]. Description. Female (holotype). Body mostly yellow (as in Fig. 8) except eyes and ocelli dirty pink, appendages yellowish or pale except apical flagellomeres a little darker, wings mostly hyaline except fore wing disc with a slight brownish tinge behind venation. Antenna (Fig. 2) with scape 3.1× as long as wide, without distinct cross-ridges, 1.8× length of pedicel; F1 cylindrical and the shortest funicular segment, slightly less than half length of pedicel; F2 shorter than F3; F3–F6 subequal in length (F4 the longest funicular); F3–F6 each with 2 mps; clava with 3 mps, 3.1× as long as wide, a little shorter than combined length of F5 and F6. Midlobe of mesoscutum without adnotaular setae. Fore wing (Fig. 3) 7.3× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 2.7× maximum wing width; disc with a median row of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving distinct bare areas along the margins. Hind wing (Fig. 3) about 20× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 6.8× maximum wing width; disc mostly bare except for a row of setae along posterior margin. Ovipositor (Fig. 4) quite short, not extending anteriorly to mesophragma in slide-mounted specimens and not exserted posteriorly beyond apex of gaster, 1.5× length of protibia; second valvifers [= external plates of ovipositor, e.g., Chiappini et al. (1996)] each with 1 distal seta. Measurements of the slide-mounted holotype (as length or length: width for the wings). Body 0.58; head 0.106; mesosoma 0.19; gaster 0.3; ovipositor 0.172. Antenna: scape 0.069; pedicel 0.039; F1 0.018; F2 0.027; F3 0.045; F4 0.048; F5 0.047; F6 0.045; clava 0.085. Fore wing 0.458:0.063; longest marginal seta 0.17. Hind wing 0.424:0.021; longest marginal seta 0.142. Variation (paratypes). Body length of dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens 0.5 mm. Fore wing 7.2–7.3× as long as wide; distal macrochaeta 2.6–2.9× length of proximal macrochaeta. Ovipositor 1.3× length of protibia. Male. Body length of dry-mounted, critical point-dried paratypes (includes a measurement taken prior to slidemounting) 0.46–0.5 mm. Similar to female except for the normal sexually dimorphic features such as the antenna (Fig. 5) and genitalia (Fig. 7), and the following. Scape 3.0× as long as wide; F1 a little shorter than following flagellomeres; F10 and F11 broadly attached to each other so appearing to form a clava more than usual for the males of other Anagrus species. Fore wing (Fig. 6) 6.4× as long as wide. Genitalia length 0.118 mm. Diagnosis. This new species belongs to the atomus species group of A. (Anagrus) Haliday, as defined by Chiappini et al. (1996), because it has 3 mps on the clava of the female antenna. In Triapitsyn (2015), females of A. nedotepae key to couplet 19 together with A. scassellatii Paoli and A. sensillatus Viggiani & Jesu, both from the Afrotropical region. All have 2 mps on F3 of the female antenna. Among the three, A. nedotepae seems to be more similar to A. scassellatii, but the latter has two rather than one rows of setae on the fore wing disc between the admarginal rows. A modified couplet is provided below to differentiate these three species. 19(18) Fore wing disc with 5 or 6 rows of setae in the broadest part in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving no bare areas (Viggiani & Jesu 1995, fig. III, 2) .................................................................... Anagrus (Anagrus) sensillatus Viggiani & Jesu - Fore wing with 1 or 2 rows of setae in the broadest part in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving at least one distinct bare area................................................................................................................................................................................. 19' 19'(19) Midlobe of mesoscutum without adnotaular setae; fore wing disc with 1 median row of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae leaving distinct bare areas along both anterior and posterior margins (Fig. 3) .......................................................................................................................... Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn sp. n. - Midlobe of mesoscutum with adnotaular setae; fore wing disc with 2 rows of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae leaving a distinct bare area along posterior margin only (Paoli 1930, fig. 2, G) ............. Anagrus (Anagrus) scassellatii Paoli Etymology. The species is named after the generic name of its leafhopper host, Nedotepa curta. Notes on biology and host association. Unlike most other leafhoppers, females of N. curta lay eggs on the surface of the leaves (Dmitriev 2016) and then guard them (Fig. 10), very often remaining with their offspring until nymphs become adults. Upon locating a host egg cluster (Figs 9, 11), females of A. nedotepae (Fig. 8) antennate the eggs (Fig. 11) and then oviposit in them. Despite the fact that the host eggs are all the time guarded by female leafhoppers till they hatch, usually at least half of them get parasitized.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyTravaux en français237 207