MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950310873 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6010345

Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn, sp. n.

2017· article· en· W6950310873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSimple eye in invertebratesScapeWingSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn, sp. n. (Figs 1–8) Type material. Holotype female on slide (Fig. 1), deposited in UCRC, labeled: 1. “ Côte d'Ivoire: Lagunes District Grand-Lahou Department, Yaokro 5°09'54''N 5°09'50''W, 8 m Collected 12.ii. 2017, emerged 17.ii.2017, K. E. Kwadjo, from eggs of Nedotepa curta Dmitriev ”; 2. “ Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2017 in Canada Balsam”; 3. [magenta] “ Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀ ”; 4. “dry body length ca. 0.6 mm Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2017”; 5. [database barcode label] “ UCRC UCRC _ ENT 00407585 ”. The holotype is mounted dorsoventrally and lacking one pair of wings. Paratypes, same data: 2 ♀ and 1 ♂ on slides [CNC (1 ♀) and UCRC (1 ♀ and 1 ♂)], as well as 2 ♀ and 1 ♂ on points [UCRC]. Description. Female (holotype). Body mostly yellow (as in Fig. 8) except eyes and ocelli dirty pink, appendages yellowish or pale except apical flagellomeres a little darker, wings mostly hyaline except fore wing disc with a slight brownish tinge behind venation. Antenna (Fig. 2) with scape 3.1× as long as wide, without distinct cross-ridges, 1.8× length of pedicel; F1 cylindrical and the shortest funicular segment, slightly less than half length of pedicel; F2 shorter than F3; F3–F6 subequal in length (F4 the longest funicular); F3–F6 each with 2 mps; clava with 3 mps, 3.1× as long as wide, a little shorter than combined length of F5 and F6. Midlobe of mesoscutum without adnotaular setae. Fore wing (Fig. 3) 7.3× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 2.7× maximum wing width; disc with a median row of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving distinct bare areas along the margins. Hind wing (Fig. 3) about 20× as long as wide, longest marginal seta 6.8× maximum wing width; disc mostly bare except for a row of setae along posterior margin. Ovipositor (Fig. 4) quite short, not extending anteriorly to mesophragma in slide-mounted specimens and not exserted posteriorly beyond apex of gaster, 1.5× length of protibia; second valvifers [= external plates of ovipositor, e.g., Chiappini et al. (1996)] each with 1 distal seta. Measurements of the slide-mounted holotype (as length or length: width for the wings). Body 0.58; head 0.106; mesosoma 0.19; gaster 0.3; ovipositor 0.172. Antenna: scape 0.069; pedicel 0.039; F1 0.018; F2 0.027; F3 0.045; F4 0.048; F5 0.047; F6 0.045; clava 0.085. Fore wing 0.458:0.063; longest marginal seta 0.17. Hind wing 0.424:0.021; longest marginal seta 0.142. Variation (paratypes). Body length of dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens 0.5 mm. Fore wing 7.2–7.3× as long as wide; distal macrochaeta 2.6–2.9× length of proximal macrochaeta. Ovipositor 1.3× length of protibia. Male. Body length of dry-mounted, critical point-dried paratypes (includes a measurement taken prior to slidemounting) 0.46–0.5 mm. Similar to female except for the normal sexually dimorphic features such as the antenna (Fig. 5) and genitalia (Fig. 7), and the following. Scape 3.0× as long as wide; F1 a little shorter than following flagellomeres; F10 and F11 broadly attached to each other so appearing to form a clava more than usual for the males of other Anagrus species. Fore wing (Fig. 6) 6.4× as long as wide. Genitalia length 0.118 mm. Diagnosis. This new species belongs to the atomus species group of A. (Anagrus) Haliday, as defined by Chiappini et al. (1996), because it has 3 mps on the clava of the female antenna. In Triapitsyn (2015), females of A. nedotepae key to couplet 19 together with A. scassellatii Paoli and A. sensillatus Viggiani & Jesu, both from the Afrotropical region. All have 2 mps on F3 of the female antenna. Among the three, A. nedotepae seems to be more similar to A. scassellatii, but the latter has two rather than one rows of setae on the fore wing disc between the admarginal rows. A modified couplet is provided below to differentiate these three species. 19(18) Fore wing disc with 5 or 6 rows of setae in the broadest part in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving no bare areas (Viggiani & Jesu 1995, fig. III, 2) .................................................................... Anagrus (Anagrus) sensillatus Viggiani & Jesu - Fore wing with 1 or 2 rows of setae in the broadest part in addition to admarginal rows of setae, leaving at least one distinct bare area................................................................................................................................................................................. 19' 19'(19) Midlobe of mesoscutum without adnotaular setae; fore wing disc with 1 median row of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae leaving distinct bare areas along both anterior and posterior margins (Fig. 3) .......................................................................................................................... Anagrus (Anagrus) nedotepae Triapitsyn sp. n. - Midlobe of mesoscutum with adnotaular setae; fore wing disc with 2 rows of setae in addition to admarginal rows of setae leaving a distinct bare area along posterior margin only (Paoli 1930, fig. 2, G) ............. Anagrus (Anagrus) scassellatii Paoli Etymology. The species is named after the generic name of its leafhopper host, Nedotepa curta. Notes on biology and host association. Unlike most other leafhoppers, females of N. curta lay eggs on the surface of the leaves (Dmitriev 2016) and then guard them (Fig. 10), very often remaining with their offspring until nymphs become adults. Upon locating a host egg cluster (Figs 9, 11), females of A. nedotepae (Fig. 8) antennate the eggs (Fig. 11) and then oviposit in them. Despite the fact that the host eggs are all the time guarded by female leafhoppers till they hatch, usually at least half of them get parasitized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyFrench-language works237,207