MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6958233867 · doi:10.60692/dwaca-bcs77

Mammalian Smaug Is a Translational Repressor That Forms Cytoplasmic Foci Similar to Stress Granules

2005· article· en· W6958233867 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreater South Information System · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueRNA Research and Splicing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRepressorRNA-binding proteinPolyadenylationGeneTranslation (biology)CytoplasmRNAStress granule

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cytoplasmic events depending on RNA-binding proteins contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression. Sterile α motif-containing RNA-binding proteins constitute a novel family of post-transcriptional regulators that recognize a specific RNA sequence motif known as Smaug recognition element (SRE). The Drosophila member of this family, dSmaug, triggers the translational repression and deadenylation of maternal mRNAs by independent mechanisms, and the yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers. Two homologous genes are present in the mammalian genome. Here we showed that hSmaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses the translation of reporter transcripts carrying SRE motifs. When expressed in fibroblasts, hSmaug 1 forms cytoplasmic granules that contain polyadenylated mRNA and the RNA-binding proteins Staufen, TIAR, TIA-1, and HuR. Smaug 1 foci are distinct from degradation foci. The murine protein mSmaug 1 is expressed in the central nervous system and is abundant in post-synaptic densities, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation. Biochemical analysis indicated that mSmaug 1 is present in synaptoneurosomal 20 S particles. These results suggest a role for mammalian Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation in neurons. Cytoplasmic events depending on RNA-binding proteins contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression. Sterile α motif-containing RNA-binding proteins constitute a novel family of post-transcriptional regulators that recognize a specific RNA sequence motif known as Smaug recognition element (SRE). The Drosophila member of this family, dSmaug, triggers the translational repression and deadenylation of maternal mRNAs by independent mechanisms, and the yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers. Two homologous genes are present in the mammalian genome. Here we showed that hSmaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses the translation of reporter transcripts carrying SRE motifs. When expressed in fibroblasts, hSmaug 1 forms cytoplasmic granules that contain polyadenylated mRNA and the RNA-binding proteins Staufen, TIAR, TIA-1, and HuR. Smaug 1 foci are distinct from degradation foci. The murine protein mSmaug 1 is expressed in the central nervous system and is abundant in post-synaptic densities, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation. Biochemical analysis indicated that mSmaug 1 is present in synaptoneurosomal 20 S particles. These results suggest a role for mammalian Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation in neurons. Messenger RNA localization, translation activation, silencing, and controlled degradation contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression in time and space. All these processes depend on several families of RNA-binding proteins that are of comparable importance to transcription factors in regulating gene expression (1Keene J.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 7018-7024Crossref PubMed Scopus (199) Google Scholar). Sterile α motif (SAM) 3The abbreviations used are: SAMsterile α motifSRESmaug recognition elementECFPenhanced cyan fluorescent proteinPABPpoly(A)-binding proteinSGstress granulesPBprocessing bodiesSMNsurvival motor neuron proteinTIA-1T-cell intracytoplasmic antigenTIARTIA-1-related proteinPBSphosphate-buffered salineRTreverse transcriptionBHKbaby hamster kidneydDrosophilahhumanmmurine.-containing RNA binding domains define a novel family of RNA-binding proteins that function as post-transcriptional regulators (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar). They bind to an RNA sequence motif known as SRE (Smaug recognition element), the Drosophila protein Smaug being the first member that was identified (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar, 3Smibert C.A. Lie Y.S. Shillinglaw W. Henzel W.J. Macdonald P.M. RNA (N. Y.). 1999; 5: 1535-1547Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar, 4Dahanukar A. Walker J.A. Wharton R.P. Mol. Cell. 1999; 4: 209-218Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (175) Google Scholar, 5Green J.B. Gardner C.D. Wharton R.P. Aggarwal A.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 1537-1548Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). Drosophila Smaug is involved in translational repression of the maternal mRNA encoding nanos, a posterior determinant, and thus plays a role in defining embryo polarity. Smaug recruits Cup, an eIF4E-binding protein that prevents the association of eIF4E with eIF4G, thus blocking initiation of the translation of SRE-containing messengers (6Nelson M.R. Leidal A.M. Smibert C.A. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 150-159Crossref PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar). In addition, it has been reported recently that Drosophila Smaug mediates degradation of maternal Hsp83 mRNAs by an independent mechanism that involves the CCR4 deadenylase and does not require Cup nor SRE motifs (7Semotok J.L. Cooperstock R.L. Pinder B.D. Vari H.K. Lipshitz H.D. Smibert C.A. Curr. Biol. 2005; 15: 284-294Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar). The yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers by a similar mechanism (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar). sterile α motif Smaug recognition element enhanced cyan fluorescent protein poly(A)-binding protein stress granules processing bodies survival motor neuron protein T-cell intracytoplasmic antigen TIA-1-related protein phosphate-buffered saline reverse transcription baby hamster kidney Drosophila human murine. Two Smaug homologous genes of unknown function are present in the mammalian genome (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar, 3Smibert C.A. Lie Y.S. Shillinglaw W. Henzel W.J. Macdonald P.M. RNA (N. Y.). 1999; 5: 1535-1547Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar). Here we show that Smaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses translation of SRE-containing messengers in fibroblast cell lines. Both hSmaug 1 and Drosophila Smaug form cytoplasmic granules when expressed in fibroblasts and colocalize when cotransfected. Furthermore, hSmaug 1 foci contain polyadenylated mRNAs, and their size and number depend on polysome integrity, as described in the cases of stress granules (SG) and processing bodies (PB) (8Anderson P. Kedersha N. J. Cell Sci. 2002; 115: 3227-3234Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 9Kedersha N.L. Gupta M. Li W. Miller I. Anderson P. J. Cell Biol. 1999; 147: 1431-1442Crossref PubMed Scopus (902) Google Scholar, 10Kimball S.R. Horetsky R.L. Ron D. Jefferson L.S. Harding H.P. Am. J. Physiol. 2003; 284: C273-C284Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). We found that murine Smaug 1 is expressed in the brain and is abundant in synaptoneurosomes, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation (reviewed in Refs. 11Steward O. Schuman E.M. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001; 24: 299-325Crossref PubMed Scopus (597) Google Scholar, 12Bailey C.H. Kandel E.R. Si K. Neuron. 2004; 44: 49-57Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 13Ostroff L.E. Fiala J.C. Allwardt B. Harris K.M. Neuron. 2002; 35: 535-545Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 14Takei N. Inamura N. Kawamura M. Namba H. Hara K. Yonezawa K. Nawa H. J. Neurosci. 2004; 24: 9760-9769Crossref PubMed Scopus (357) Google Scholar, 15Si K. Giustetto M. Etkin A. Hsu R. Janisiewicz A.M. Miniaci M.C. Kim J.H. Zhu H. Kandel E.R. Cell. 2003; 115: 893-904Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (349) Google Scholar, 16Krichevsky A.M. Kosik K.S. Neuron. 2001; 32: 683-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar, 17Menon K.P. Sanyal S. Habara Y. Sanchez R. Wharton R.P. Ramaswami M. Zinn K. Neuron. 2004; 44: 663-676Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar, 18Gebauer F. Hentze M.W. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004; 5: 827-835Crossref PubMed Scopus (716) Google Scholar). Our results suggest a role for Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation of SRE-containing transcripts at post-synaptic sites. Plasmids and Library Screening—A pCDNA3.0 vector (Invitrogen) encoding Drosophila Smaug was generated by subcloning the coding region from a dSmaug cDNA kindly provided by Dr. C. Smibert (University of Toronto, Canada) using the primers 5′-TAAGAACTATCCCGGTACCACAA-3′ and 5′-GATCAAATTTGCTCGAGTTCTCC-3′. Firefly luciferase reporters carrying three copies of either wild type or mutated SRE were constructed by subcloning of the BamHI/HindIII fragment of C145 and C146 plasmids, a generous gift of C. Smibert (19Smibert C.A. Wilson J.E. Kerr K. Macdonald P.M. Genes Dev. 1996; 10: 2600-2609Crossref PubMed Scopus (185) Google Scholar), into a pcDNA3.0 vector. A pCDNA6.0 encoding murine Staufen 1 (GenBank™ accession number AF395842) (20Thomas M.G. Martinez Tosar L.J. Loschi M. Pasquini J.M. Correale J. Kindler S. Boccaccio G.L. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005; 16: 405-420Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar) was used. The predicted coding region of hSmaug 1 from the AK034323 EST was subcloned between HindIII and SacII sites in the pECFP-N1 vector (Clontech) and KpnI and XhoI sites in the pcDNA6.0 vector (Invitrogen). Screening of the mouse brain, heart, kidney, testis, and embryo cDNA libraries was performed at OriGene Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD) using three pairs of primers: 5′-GTGGAGTAGTGATTGCCGCTTG-3′ and 5′-CACTCGTTCCAGCCCTTAAACC-3′; 5′-CAGTCCAACTCCCTCCCAACAG-3′ and 5′-AGTCTCTGCAACCCTGAAGATGG-3′; and 5′-AGACTGTTGCACTGCTGTCG-3′ and 5′-TCCAATCGTGTTGATTGTGG-3′. Primary Antibody agai

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreater South Information System→Même sujetRNA Research and Splicing→Travaux en français237 207→