MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6958233867 · doi:10.60692/dwaca-bcs77

Mammalian Smaug Is a Translational Repressor That Forms Cytoplasmic Foci Similar to Stress Granules

2005· article· en· W6958233867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepressorRNA-binding proteinPolyadenylationGeneTranslation (biology)CytoplasmRNAStress granule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytoplasmic events depending on RNA-binding proteins contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression. Sterile α motif-containing RNA-binding proteins constitute a novel family of post-transcriptional regulators that recognize a specific RNA sequence motif known as Smaug recognition element (SRE). The Drosophila member of this family, dSmaug, triggers the translational repression and deadenylation of maternal mRNAs by independent mechanisms, and the yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers. Two homologous genes are present in the mammalian genome. Here we showed that hSmaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses the translation of reporter transcripts carrying SRE motifs. When expressed in fibroblasts, hSmaug 1 forms cytoplasmic granules that contain polyadenylated mRNA and the RNA-binding proteins Staufen, TIAR, TIA-1, and HuR. Smaug 1 foci are distinct from degradation foci. The murine protein mSmaug 1 is expressed in the central nervous system and is abundant in post-synaptic densities, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation. Biochemical analysis indicated that mSmaug 1 is present in synaptoneurosomal 20 S particles. These results suggest a role for mammalian Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation in neurons. Cytoplasmic events depending on RNA-binding proteins contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression. Sterile α motif-containing RNA-binding proteins constitute a novel family of post-transcriptional regulators that recognize a specific RNA sequence motif known as Smaug recognition element (SRE). The Drosophila member of this family, dSmaug, triggers the translational repression and deadenylation of maternal mRNAs by independent mechanisms, and the yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers. Two homologous genes are present in the mammalian genome. Here we showed that hSmaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses the translation of reporter transcripts carrying SRE motifs. When expressed in fibroblasts, hSmaug 1 forms cytoplasmic granules that contain polyadenylated mRNA and the RNA-binding proteins Staufen, TIAR, TIA-1, and HuR. Smaug 1 foci are distinct from degradation foci. The murine protein mSmaug 1 is expressed in the central nervous system and is abundant in post-synaptic densities, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation. Biochemical analysis indicated that mSmaug 1 is present in synaptoneurosomal 20 S particles. These results suggest a role for mammalian Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation in neurons. Messenger RNA localization, translation activation, silencing, and controlled degradation contribute to the fine-tuning of gene expression in time and space. All these processes depend on several families of RNA-binding proteins that are of comparable importance to transcription factors in regulating gene expression (1Keene J.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 7018-7024Crossref PubMed Scopus (199) Google Scholar). Sterile α motif (SAM) 3The abbreviations used are: SAMsterile α motifSRESmaug recognition elementECFPenhanced cyan fluorescent proteinPABPpoly(A)-binding proteinSGstress granulesPBprocessing bodiesSMNsurvival motor neuron proteinTIA-1T-cell intracytoplasmic antigenTIARTIA-1-related proteinPBSphosphate-buffered salineRTreverse transcriptionBHKbaby hamster kidneydDrosophilahhumanmmurine.-containing RNA binding domains define a novel family of RNA-binding proteins that function as post-transcriptional regulators (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar). They bind to an RNA sequence motif known as SRE (Smaug recognition element), the Drosophila protein Smaug being the first member that was identified (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar, 3Smibert C.A. Lie Y.S. Shillinglaw W. Henzel W.J. Macdonald P.M. RNA (N. Y.). 1999; 5: 1535-1547Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar, 4Dahanukar A. Walker J.A. Wharton R.P. Mol. Cell. 1999; 4: 209-218Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (175) Google Scholar, 5Green J.B. Gardner C.D. Wharton R.P. Aggarwal A.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 1537-1548Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). Drosophila Smaug is involved in translational repression of the maternal mRNA encoding nanos, a posterior determinant, and thus plays a role in defining embryo polarity. Smaug recruits Cup, an eIF4E-binding protein that prevents the association of eIF4E with eIF4G, thus blocking initiation of the translation of SRE-containing messengers (6Nelson M.R. Leidal A.M. Smibert C.A. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 150-159Crossref PubMed Scopus (197) Google Scholar). In addition, it has been reported recently that Drosophila Smaug mediates degradation of maternal Hsp83 mRNAs by an independent mechanism that involves the CCR4 deadenylase and does not require Cup nor SRE motifs (7Semotok J.L. Cooperstock R.L. Pinder B.D. Vari H.K. Lipshitz H.D. Smibert C.A. Curr. Biol. 2005; 15: 284-294Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar). The yeast homologue Vts1 stimulates degradation of SRE-containing messengers by a similar mechanism (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar). sterile α motif Smaug recognition element enhanced cyan fluorescent protein poly(A)-binding protein stress granules processing bodies survival motor neuron protein T-cell intracytoplasmic antigen TIA-1-related protein phosphate-buffered saline reverse transcription baby hamster kidney Drosophila human murine. Two Smaug homologous genes of unknown function are present in the mammalian genome (2Aviv T. Lin Z. Lau S. Rendl L.M. Sicheri F. Smibert C.A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 614-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar, 3Smibert C.A. Lie Y.S. Shillinglaw W. Henzel W.J. Macdonald P.M. RNA (N. Y.). 1999; 5: 1535-1547Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar). Here we show that Smaug 1, encoded in human chromosome 14, represses translation of SRE-containing messengers in fibroblast cell lines. Both hSmaug 1 and Drosophila Smaug form cytoplasmic granules when expressed in fibroblasts and colocalize when cotransfected. Furthermore, hSmaug 1 foci contain polyadenylated mRNAs, and their size and number depend on polysome integrity, as described in the cases of stress granules (SG) and processing bodies (PB) (8Anderson P. Kedersha N. J. Cell Sci. 2002; 115: 3227-3234Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 9Kedersha N.L. Gupta M. Li W. Miller I. Anderson P. J. Cell Biol. 1999; 147: 1431-1442Crossref PubMed Scopus (902) Google Scholar, 10Kimball S.R. Horetsky R.L. Ron D. Jefferson L.S. Harding H.P. Am. J. Physiol. 2003; 284: C273-C284Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). We found that murine Smaug 1 is expressed in the brain and is abundant in synaptoneurosomes, a subcellular region where translation is tightly regulated by synaptic stimulation (reviewed in Refs. 11Steward O. Schuman E.M. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001; 24: 299-325Crossref PubMed Scopus (597) Google Scholar, 12Bailey C.H. Kandel E.R. Si K. Neuron. 2004; 44: 49-57Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 13Ostroff L.E. Fiala J.C. Allwardt B. Harris K.M. Neuron. 2002; 35: 535-545Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 14Takei N. Inamura N. Kawamura M. Namba H. Hara K. Yonezawa K. Nawa H. J. Neurosci. 2004; 24: 9760-9769Crossref PubMed Scopus (357) Google Scholar, 15Si K. Giustetto M. Etkin A. Hsu R. Janisiewicz A.M. Miniaci M.C. Kim J.H. Zhu H. Kandel E.R. Cell. 2003; 115: 893-904Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (349) Google Scholar, 16Krichevsky A.M. Kosik K.S. Neuron. 2001; 32: 683-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar, 17Menon K.P. Sanyal S. Habara Y. Sanchez R. Wharton R.P. Ramaswami M. Zinn K. Neuron. 2004; 44: 663-676Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar, 18Gebauer F. Hentze M.W. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004; 5: 827-835Crossref PubMed Scopus (716) Google Scholar). Our results suggest a role for Smaug 1 in RNA granule formation and translation regulation of SRE-containing transcripts at post-synaptic sites. Plasmids and Library Screening—A pCDNA3.0 vector (Invitrogen) encoding Drosophila Smaug was generated by subcloning the coding region from a dSmaug cDNA kindly provided by Dr. C. Smibert (University of Toronto, Canada) using the primers 5′-TAAGAACTATCCCGGTACCACAA-3′ and 5′-GATCAAATTTGCTCGAGTTCTCC-3′. Firefly luciferase reporters carrying three copies of either wild type or mutated SRE were constructed by subcloning of the BamHI/HindIII fragment of C145 and C146 plasmids, a generous gift of C. Smibert (19Smibert C.A. Wilson J.E. Kerr K. Macdonald P.M. Genes Dev. 1996; 10: 2600-2609Crossref PubMed Scopus (185) Google Scholar), into a pcDNA3.0 vector. A pCDNA6.0 encoding murine Staufen 1 (GenBank™ accession number AF395842) (20Thomas M.G. Martinez Tosar L.J. Loschi M. Pasquini J.M. Correale J. Kindler S. Boccaccio G.L. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005; 16: 405-420Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar) was used. The predicted coding region of hSmaug 1 from the AK034323 EST was subcloned between HindIII and SacII sites in the pECFP-N1 vector (Clontech) and KpnI and XhoI sites in the pcDNA6.0 vector (Invitrogen). Screening of the mouse brain, heart, kidney, testis, and embryo cDNA libraries was performed at OriGene Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD) using three pairs of primers: 5′-GTGGAGTAGTGATTGCCGCTTG-3′ and 5′-CACTCGTTCCAGCCCTTAAACC-3′; 5′-CAGTCCAACTCCCTCCCAACAG-3′ and 5′-AGTCTCTGCAACCCTGAAGATGG-3′; and 5′-AGACTGTTGCACTGCTGTCG-3′ and 5′-TCCAATCGTGTTGATTGTGG-3′. Primary Antibody agai

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information System→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→