MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6958594172 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26564553.v1

Additional file 1 of Depletion of polyfunctional CD26highCD8+ T cells repertoire in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

2024· article· en· W6958594172 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChronic lymphocytic leukemiaFlow cytometryCumulative doseCumulative incidenceT lymphocyteT cellLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Figure. S1. a Representative flow plot of the purity of isolated CD3+ T cells, (b) CD3+CCR7- cells, and (c) CD19+ B cells. d Representative flow plots of the gating strategy for CD26 staining in CD8+ T cells. e Cumulative data showing the number of CD26low and CD26high CD8+ T cells as normalized in 100,000 CD8+ T cells in HC and CLL patients. f Cumulative data comparing the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of CD26 in CD26low and CD26high CD8+ T cells. g Cumulative data comparing the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells in female versus male CLL patients. h Correlation between the age of CLL patients and the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells. i Cumulative data comparing the frequency of CD26+ and, (j) CD26low, CD26high CD8+ T cells in treated versus non-treated CLL. k Cumulative data are comparing the proportion of CD26+CD8+ T cell in three clinical stages of CLL (Low/Intermediate/high) based on the Rai staging system. l Correlation between CD26+CD8+ T cell frequency and lymphocyte counts (x103/ $$\mu$$ μ l) in CLL. m Representative flow plots, and (n) cumulative data of the frequency of CD26 among CD3- and CD3+ T cells in HC and CLL. (o) Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD26+CD4+ T cells, and (p) CD56+NK cells in HC versus CLL. q Cumulative data showing the MFI of CD26 in B cells from HCs and malignant B cells (B-CLL). r Cumulative data of the concentrations of soluble CD26 (ng/ml) in the plasma of HC and CLL. s Cumulative data of the frequency of CD26+, and (t) CD26low, CD26high CD8+ T cell in the peripheral blood versus bone marrow of CLL. u Cumulative data of CD26 mRNA expression in CD8+ T cells of HCs vs. CLL (n=15). Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S2. a Representative plots, and (b) cumulative data of the frequency of CD8+ T cell subsets (e.g. naïve, stem cell memory, central memory, transitional memory, effector memory, and effectors). c Representative flow plots, and (d) cumulative data showing the frequency of CD27 expressing cells among CD26neg/low/high effector memory subsets of CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative plots, and (f) Cumulative data of the frequency of TV $$\alpha$$ α 7.2+CD161high in CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. g Cumulative data of the frequency of TV $$\alpha$$ α 7.2+ CD161high in CD26highCD8+ T cells in HC versus CLL. h Cumulative data of the frequency of CD160+, (i) 2B4+, (j) PD-1+, (k) TIGIT+, (l) ICOS+, (m) CD28+ , (n) CD27+, (o) CD39+ , and (p) CD73+ among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. q Representative plots of the co-expression of CD26 and CD73 in different CD8+ T cell subsets (naïve, central memory, effector memory, and effector) in CLL. r The pie charts show the pattern of CD26 and CD73 co-expression in different CD8+ T cell subsets in CLL. s Cumulative data of the frequency of CD26+CD73+ versus CD26+CD73- in CD8+ T cells of HC versus CLL. t Cumulative data of the frequency of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory receptors in CD26highCD8+ T cell subset in HC and CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S3. a Cumulative data of the frequency of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory receptors in CD26neg CD8+ T cell subset in HC and CLL. b Cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB+, (c) Perforin+, and (d) GzmB+Perforin+ among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+CCR7- T cells in CLL. e Cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB+, (f) Perforin+, and (g) GzmB+Perforin+ CD8+ T cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high subsets in HC. h Representative plots, and (i) cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB and perforin expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL either unstimulated (black color) or stimulated for following 5 h with anti-CD3/CD28 (3 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml, 1 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml). j Cumulative data of the frequency of TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +, (k) IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ +, and (l) TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ + cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. m Cumulative data of the frequency of TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +, (n) IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ +, and (o) TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ + among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. p Representative plots, and cumulative data of the frequency of (q) CCR4+CCR6+ cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc17 cells. r Representative plots, and (s) cumulative data of the frequency of CXCR3+CCR6+ expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc1/Tc17 cells. t Cumulative data of the frequency of CXCR3+CCR6- among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc1 cells. u Cumulative data showing the frequency of CCR4+CCR6- among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc2 cells. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Florescence minus one (FMO). Figure. S4. a Cumulative data of the expression of T-bet in different CD8+ T cells subsets in CLL. b Cumulative data of the expression of FOXP3 in different CD8+ T cells subsets in CLL. c Representative plots, and (d) cumulative data showing the intensity (MFI) of TOX expression among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative plots, and (f) cumulative data showing the intensity (MFI) of CCR5 expression among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. g Representative plots, and (h) cumulative data showing the intensity of CCR6 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. i Representative plots, and (j) cumulative data showing the intensity of Integrin- $$\beta 7$$ β 7 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. k Representative plots, and (l) cumulative data of the intensity of CCR7 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. m Representative plots, and (n) cumulative data of the intensity of CLA (Cutaneous Lymphocyte Antigen) expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. o Cumulative data of the frequency, and (p) the intensity of CXCR3+ expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. q Cumulative data of the frequency, and (r) the intensity of CXCR4+ expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. s Cumulative data of the intensity of CCR4 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S5. a Representative plots, and (b) cumulative data of the frequency of CD69 expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. c Cumulative data showing the frequency of TSCM (T Stem Cell Memory: CCR7+ CD45RA+CD95+) among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. d Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD16+ in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative histogram plots, and (f) cumulative data of CD26 expression in CD8+ T cells upon culture with 10% plasma. (g, h) showing detected plasma concentrations of different cytokines and chemokines in CLL versus HCs. Cumulative data showing the intensity of CD26 in the presence/absence of (i) TNF-α, (j) IL-16, (k) IFN-γ, (l) IL-6, (m) IL-10, and (n) IFN-α. o Detected total plasma TGF-β and (p) free TGF-β in CLL versus HCs. q Cumulative data showing the intensity of CD26 expression in CD8+ T cells in the presence/absence of free TGF-β. r The correlation of plasma free TGF-β with the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells in CLL patients. s Cumulative data showing the intensity of Annexin-V expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells from CLL patients following treatment with recombinant human Gal-9 (0.02 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml) in-vitro. t Concentrations of Gal-9 (pg/ml) in supernatants of PBMCs (1× 106 cells/well) from HC and CLL were collected 18 h post culture. u Concentrations of IL-18 (pg/ml) (v) IL-12/IL-23p40 (pg/ml), and (w) IL-15 (pg/ml) in the plasma of HC versus CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S6. a Cumulative data showing the intensity of Annexin-V expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells from CLL patients following 8 h of culture in the presence of a cytokine cocktail (IL-18+IL-12+IL-15 (100 ng/ml of each)). b Representative flow cytometry plots, and (c) cumulative data of CD26-expressing cells among CD8+ T cells in the thymus, blood, and spleen of BALB/c mice. d Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD28+CD8+ T cells in HC versus CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample or a mouse. Florescence minus one (FMO).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,889
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,158

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,024
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,8890,177

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Même sujetQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture→Travaux en français237 207→