Additional file 1 of Depletion of polyfunctional CD26highCD8+ T cells repertoire in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Figure. S1. a Representative flow plot of the purity of isolated CD3+ T cells, (b) CD3+CCR7- cells, and (c) CD19+ B cells. d Representative flow plots of the gating strategy for CD26 staining in CD8+ T cells. e Cumulative data showing the number of CD26low and CD26high CD8+ T cells as normalized in 100,000 CD8+ T cells in HC and CLL patients. f Cumulative data comparing the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of CD26 in CD26low and CD26high CD8+ T cells. g Cumulative data comparing the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells in female versus male CLL patients. h Correlation between the age of CLL patients and the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells. i Cumulative data comparing the frequency of CD26+ and, (j) CD26low, CD26high CD8+ T cells in treated versus non-treated CLL. k Cumulative data are comparing the proportion of CD26+CD8+ T cell in three clinical stages of CLL (Low/Intermediate/high) based on the Rai staging system. l Correlation between CD26+CD8+ T cell frequency and lymphocyte counts (x103/ $$\mu$$ μ l) in CLL. m Representative flow plots, and (n) cumulative data of the frequency of CD26 among CD3- and CD3+ T cells in HC and CLL. (o) Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD26+CD4+ T cells, and (p) CD56+NK cells in HC versus CLL. q Cumulative data showing the MFI of CD26 in B cells from HCs and malignant B cells (B-CLL). r Cumulative data of the concentrations of soluble CD26 (ng/ml) in the plasma of HC and CLL. s Cumulative data of the frequency of CD26+, and (t) CD26low, CD26high CD8+ T cell in the peripheral blood versus bone marrow of CLL. u Cumulative data of CD26 mRNA expression in CD8+ T cells of HCs vs. CLL (n=15). Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S2. a Representative plots, and (b) cumulative data of the frequency of CD8+ T cell subsets (e.g. naïve, stem cell memory, central memory, transitional memory, effector memory, and effectors). c Representative flow plots, and (d) cumulative data showing the frequency of CD27 expressing cells among CD26neg/low/high effector memory subsets of CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative plots, and (f) Cumulative data of the frequency of TV $$\alpha$$ α 7.2+CD161high in CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. g Cumulative data of the frequency of TV $$\alpha$$ α 7.2+ CD161high in CD26highCD8+ T cells in HC versus CLL. h Cumulative data of the frequency of CD160+, (i) 2B4+, (j) PD-1+, (k) TIGIT+, (l) ICOS+, (m) CD28+ , (n) CD27+, (o) CD39+ , and (p) CD73+ among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. q Representative plots of the co-expression of CD26 and CD73 in different CD8+ T cell subsets (naïve, central memory, effector memory, and effector) in CLL. r The pie charts show the pattern of CD26 and CD73 co-expression in different CD8+ T cell subsets in CLL. s Cumulative data of the frequency of CD26+CD73+ versus CD26+CD73- in CD8+ T cells of HC versus CLL. t Cumulative data of the frequency of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory receptors in CD26highCD8+ T cell subset in HC and CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S3. a Cumulative data of the frequency of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory receptors in CD26neg CD8+ T cell subset in HC and CLL. b Cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB+, (c) Perforin+, and (d) GzmB+Perforin+ among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+CCR7- T cells in CLL. e Cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB+, (f) Perforin+, and (g) GzmB+Perforin+ CD8+ T cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high subsets in HC. h Representative plots, and (i) cumulative data of the frequency of GzmB and perforin expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL either unstimulated (black color) or stimulated for following 5 h with anti-CD3/CD28 (3 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml, 1 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml). j Cumulative data of the frequency of TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +, (k) IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ +, and (l) TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ + cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. m Cumulative data of the frequency of TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +, (n) IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ +, and (o) TNF- $$\alpha$$ α +IFN- $$\gamma$$ γ + among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in HC. p Representative plots, and cumulative data of the frequency of (q) CCR4+CCR6+ cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc17 cells. r Representative plots, and (s) cumulative data of the frequency of CXCR3+CCR6+ expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc1/Tc17 cells. t Cumulative data of the frequency of CXCR3+CCR6- among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc1 cells. u Cumulative data showing the frequency of CCR4+CCR6- among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL, considered as Tc2 cells. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Florescence minus one (FMO). Figure. S4. a Cumulative data of the expression of T-bet in different CD8+ T cells subsets in CLL. b Cumulative data of the expression of FOXP3 in different CD8+ T cells subsets in CLL. c Representative plots, and (d) cumulative data showing the intensity (MFI) of TOX expression among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative plots, and (f) cumulative data showing the intensity (MFI) of CCR5 expression among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. g Representative plots, and (h) cumulative data showing the intensity of CCR6 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. i Representative plots, and (j) cumulative data showing the intensity of Integrin- $$\beta 7$$ β 7 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. k Representative plots, and (l) cumulative data of the intensity of CCR7 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. m Representative plots, and (n) cumulative data of the intensity of CLA (Cutaneous Lymphocyte Antigen) expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. o Cumulative data of the frequency, and (p) the intensity of CXCR3+ expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. q Cumulative data of the frequency, and (r) the intensity of CXCR4+ expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. s Cumulative data of the intensity of CCR4 expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S5. a Representative plots, and (b) cumulative data of the frequency of CD69 expressing cells among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. c Cumulative data showing the frequency of TSCM (T Stem Cell Memory: CCR7+ CD45RA+CD95+) among CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. d Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD16+ in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells in CLL. e Representative histogram plots, and (f) cumulative data of CD26 expression in CD8+ T cells upon culture with 10% plasma. (g, h) showing detected plasma concentrations of different cytokines and chemokines in CLL versus HCs. Cumulative data showing the intensity of CD26 in the presence/absence of (i) TNF-α, (j) IL-16, (k) IFN-γ, (l) IL-6, (m) IL-10, and (n) IFN-α. o Detected total plasma TGF-β and (p) free TGF-β in CLL versus HCs. q Cumulative data showing the intensity of CD26 expression in CD8+ T cells in the presence/absence of free TGF-β. r The correlation of plasma free TGF-β with the frequency of CD26+CD8+ T cells in CLL patients. s Cumulative data showing the intensity of Annexin-V expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells from CLL patients following treatment with recombinant human Gal-9 (0.02 $$\mu$$ μ g/ml) in-vitro. t Concentrations of Gal-9 (pg/ml) in supernatants of PBMCs (1× 106 cells/well) from HC and CLL were collected 18 h post culture. u Concentrations of IL-18 (pg/ml) (v) IL-12/IL-23p40 (pg/ml), and (w) IL-15 (pg/ml) in the plasma of HC versus CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample. Figure. S6. a Cumulative data showing the intensity of Annexin-V expression in CD26neg, CD26low, and CD26high CD8+ T cells from CLL patients following 8 h of culture in the presence of a cytokine cocktail (IL-18+IL-12+IL-15 (100 ng/ml of each)). b Representative flow cytometry plots, and (c) cumulative data of CD26-expressing cells among CD8+ T cells in the thymus, blood, and spleen of BALB/c mice. d Cumulative data showing the frequency of CD28+CD8+ T cells in HC versus CLL. Error bars represent the median with an interquartile range. Each dot represents an individual human sample or a mouse. Florescence minus one (FMO).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.889 | 0.177 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".