MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W69635713

Research with Blood Donated to Blood Banking Organizations

2013· article· en· W69635713 sur OpenAlex
Nola M. Ries

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHealth law review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEthics in Clinical Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiobankTransfusion medicineBlood transfusionResource (disambiguation)Public relationsMedicineHealth careBusinessPolitical scienceLawBioinformaticsSurgeryBiology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction A vast amount of literature examines legal, ethical and social issues involved in collection and use of blood and other biological samples for research purposes. For example, a recent study analyzed nearly 600 papers on consent and biobank (1) Some literatuAre focuses on prospective collection of blood or other biological materials for purpose of creating biobanks as a resource for biomedical Other literature addresses secondary research use of stored samples that were initially collected for clinical purposes. In contrast with wealth of literature addressing these topics, comparatively little has been written about research use of blood that is collected by blood service agencies meet blood supply needs in health care system. Public communication intended motivate people donate blood emphasizes use of blood as a precious resource sustain and save lives. Yet, blood that is collected primarily for medical care may also be stored and used for Some recent literature underscores potential benefits of creating and using repositories of donated blood for research purposes. In an editorial in Transfusion, Allain and Busch argue we feel strongly that research repositories are key advancing field [of transfusion medicine] and should be established and maintained. (2) They also suggest that such repositories can support broader research inquiries beyond those directly related transfusion medicine, that repository samples need be made widely available scientific community and should be linked with other biobanking initiatives. (3) Other researchers discuss opportunities for using blood repositories as a resource for genetic studies. (4) Another scholar cautions, however, that broader research use of blood collected by blood banks raises questions about linking the ethic of with goal of medical research. (5)Indeed, in any efforts expand research uses of blood collected by blood service agencies, it is critically important not undermine trust that donors have in these organizations. And while Allain and Busch advocate for wide research access biorepositories of donated blood, they also acknowledge that to make these resources powerful research tools it is important address ethical and/or informed consent considerations when specimens are collected allow for their future use.... (6) This article explores issues concerning research use of blood donated blood banking organizations. It begins with an overview of practices of these organizations in retaining samples and creating biorepositories. Next, article examines donors' knowledge of and attitudes toward use of donated blood in Available research shows that donors express trust in blood banks make appropriate choices for how donated blood is used, however donors may give little thought research use and focus, instead, on use for medical care purposes. Whatever their level of awareness about research uses, donors maintain a privacy interest in retained samples. The article discusses relevant privacy aspects, then turns a discussion of consent challenges and options. Blood service organizations that wish store, use and share donated samples for research should ensure that consent for research is addressed in a manner than sustains trust relationship between blood bank and donor. The concluding section of article suggests several areas for further research inform policy options for consent research use of donated blood. Blood Service Organizations and Retention and Use of Stored Samples A survey of practices among blood service agencies in more than 15 countries found that most store samples for some period, ranging from several days indefinite storage. A distinction is noted between donation specimens retained primarily for [the blood agency's] operational purposes and collections of donor and/or recipient biospecimens that are made available research community. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,792
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,502
Tête enseignante GPT0,620
Écart entre enseignants0,118 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle