MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6967320819 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10571331

Microsphecodes fernandoi Graham & Packer 2024

2024· article· en· W6967320819 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScapeHolotypePedicelHead (geology)Apex (geometry)GenusRest (music)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Microsphecodes fernandoi Graham & Packer Figs. 11, 13–18, 29, 32 & 36. Diagnosis: The colour pattern of this species is unique: the head is black except the clypeus is dark yellowish brown (Fig. 11), the mesosoma is brown, T1 and the base of T2 are somewhat paler than the remaining terga (except for the somewhat paler translucent apical impressed areas) which are dark brown (Figures 14 & 17). This is the only species with the entire mesosoma somewhat paler than the discs of T2–T6 (Figs. 14–17). Description: Holotype female: Dimensions: Total body length 4.6 mm; forewing length 3.76 mm. Head broader than long, width 1.42 mm, length 1.22 mm. Intertegular distance not measurable due to distortion caused by pin. Colouration: Light brown except as follows: Mandible brown, apical 1/4 red-brown; labrum and clypeus orange-brown; supraclypeal area dark brown; torulus, scape and pedicel orange-brown; flagellum brown; rest of head black; tegula yellow, wing veins dark brown, wing membrane translucent. All legs orange-brown. T1 orange-brown, with a dark brown apical impressed area; T2 orange-brown basally, dark brown elsewhere; T3 dark brown, apical appressed area paler; T4–T5 and pygidial plate dark brown; S1 orange-brown; S2 orange-brown basally, dark brown apically; remaining sterna dark brown; apical impressed areas translucent yellow. Pubescence: pale yellowish, relatively sparse fine simple sub-erect to erect except when stated otherwise; clypeus hairs short, branched, with longer simple hairs intermixed; lower paraocular area hairs denser with many branches, hairs marginally longer than on rest of face; sparser on vertexal area than face, shorter than longest hairs of clypeus; anterior surface of flagellum hairs sparse and long, underlying placodea dark, obscure against dark background. Pronotal collar with short, dense white hair laterally, dorsally less dense; side of mesosoma with dense somewhat plumose short white subappressed hairs with sparse erect long white hairs intermixed; hypoepimeral area almost entirely glabrous; mesoscutum hairs short sparse (surface of mesoscutum obstructed by pin posteromedially); scutellum hairs long white sparse; metanotum with dense white long hairs; posterior surface of propodeum with short, dense white hairs with some longer hairs intermixed; metatibia hairs simple suberect longest apically, shorter than or equal to apical width of tibia; dorsal surface of metatibia with pale bristles bearing few short branches on dorsal side of rachis. T1 glabrous except laterally hairs of medium length, sparsely branched; T2 as for T1, but with short appressed hairs basally; T3–T5 hairs moderately dense and short on disc, with sparse long hairs intermixed laterally and apically, subappressed medium length and white anterolaterally. S1 hairs long sparse along midline, absent elsewhere; S2–S5 hairs scattered long suberect, D-shaped glabrous area apicomedially; S6 hairs short subappressed. Surface Sculpture: Integument shiny lacking microsculpture unless stated otherwise. Face densely punctate i<d, with the exception being more sparse towards apex of supraclypeal area; vertexal area punctures sparser i=1–4d; impunctate around ocelli; genal area punctures small sparse i=1–3d;hypostomal area weakly imbricate except on disc, sparsely punctate. Mesoscutum very weakly imbricate, punctures distinct, varying in size, irregularly spaced i=0.5– 2.5d, densest laterally, sparsest on disc (obscured by pin posteriorly); mesoscutellum faintly imbricate, punctures scattered on disc, denser around margins i~1d; metanotum punctures dense i~1d. Metapostnotum dorsal surface margined by strong carina, indented posteromedially; areolate, median pair of areolae on either side of apically complete median carina take up most of the dorsal surface, margined by smaller elongate areolae. Preepisternum and hypoepimeral areas weakly rugose; mesepisternum punctate posteriorly punctures small, i<d; [metepisternum obscured by pubescence]; propodeum coarsely areolate, areolae on posterior surface large. Tegula impunctate weakly imbricate. T1–T2 very weakly imbricate laterally, impunctate; T3 punctures small dense i=0.5–3d; T4–T5 weakly imbricate, punctures small. S1 weakly imbricate, impunctate; S2–S5 imbricate, punctures shallow; S6 imbricate, more densely punctate than other sterna. Structure: Mandible shorter than compound eye (0.6 mm: 0.82 mm). Clypeus 3.5X broader than long (0.84 mm: 0.24 mm). Supraclypeal area convex, somewhat protuberant in profile. Frontal line carinate from just below lower tangent of antennal socket to ~1MOD below median ocellus (MOD = 0.12 mm). Inner margin of compound eyes somewhat convergent below: UOD:LOD 0.92 mm: 0.82 mm; ASD 0.1 mm, IAD 0.2 mm; supraclypeal area as long as wide (apical width 0.28 mm, length 0.28 mm); IOD:OOD 0.24 mm: 0.28 mm; vertex strongly convex in frontal view, upper tangent of compound eyes 0.25 MOD below lower tangent of median ocellus; genal area narrower than compound eye in profile (0.32 mm: 0.42 mm); F1 shorter than F2 (0.08mm: 0.12 mm). [Mesoscutum length to width ratio not measurable—surface distorted by pin.] Stigma large, 0.62 mm long, 0.18mm wide (~3.5:1); margin in marginal cell convex, marginal cell 1.04 mm long, 0.28mm wide, free portion slightly less than 3X that subtended by submarginal cells (0.82 mm: 0.3 mm); 1m-cu meets second submarginal cell near middle; stigmal perpendicular goes through 2r-m near anterior margin; hind wing with five distal hamuli. Pygidial plate apically rounded, surface slightly concave. Material Studied. Holotype female: FRENCH GUIANA, Les Eaux Claires, 3.5 mi. N[orth of] Saul, N3°38 - 40’ W53°13’ [~3.65 -53.21], 14-21 July 1995, mal[aise]. trap, A. Berkov, AMNH. Etymology: The species is known from a unique specimen and is named to honour the memory of Fernando Silveira who was also a unique individual, one of the warmest and funniest people the junior author has ever met; his passing is a great loss.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,442
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchTravaux en français237 207