MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6967320819 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10571331

Microsphecodes fernandoi Graham & Packer 2024

2024· article· en· W6967320819 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapeHolotypePedicelHead (geology)Apex (geometry)GenusRest (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microsphecodes fernandoi Graham & Packer Figs. 11, 13–18, 29, 32 & 36. Diagnosis: The colour pattern of this species is unique: the head is black except the clypeus is dark yellowish brown (Fig. 11), the mesosoma is brown, T1 and the base of T2 are somewhat paler than the remaining terga (except for the somewhat paler translucent apical impressed areas) which are dark brown (Figures 14 & 17). This is the only species with the entire mesosoma somewhat paler than the discs of T2–T6 (Figs. 14–17). Description: Holotype female: Dimensions: Total body length 4.6 mm; forewing length 3.76 mm. Head broader than long, width 1.42 mm, length 1.22 mm. Intertegular distance not measurable due to distortion caused by pin. Colouration: Light brown except as follows: Mandible brown, apical 1/4 red-brown; labrum and clypeus orange-brown; supraclypeal area dark brown; torulus, scape and pedicel orange-brown; flagellum brown; rest of head black; tegula yellow, wing veins dark brown, wing membrane translucent. All legs orange-brown. T1 orange-brown, with a dark brown apical impressed area; T2 orange-brown basally, dark brown elsewhere; T3 dark brown, apical appressed area paler; T4–T5 and pygidial plate dark brown; S1 orange-brown; S2 orange-brown basally, dark brown apically; remaining sterna dark brown; apical impressed areas translucent yellow. Pubescence: pale yellowish, relatively sparse fine simple sub-erect to erect except when stated otherwise; clypeus hairs short, branched, with longer simple hairs intermixed; lower paraocular area hairs denser with many branches, hairs marginally longer than on rest of face; sparser on vertexal area than face, shorter than longest hairs of clypeus; anterior surface of flagellum hairs sparse and long, underlying placodea dark, obscure against dark background. Pronotal collar with short, dense white hair laterally, dorsally less dense; side of mesosoma with dense somewhat plumose short white subappressed hairs with sparse erect long white hairs intermixed; hypoepimeral area almost entirely glabrous; mesoscutum hairs short sparse (surface of mesoscutum obstructed by pin posteromedially); scutellum hairs long white sparse; metanotum with dense white long hairs; posterior surface of propodeum with short, dense white hairs with some longer hairs intermixed; metatibia hairs simple suberect longest apically, shorter than or equal to apical width of tibia; dorsal surface of metatibia with pale bristles bearing few short branches on dorsal side of rachis. T1 glabrous except laterally hairs of medium length, sparsely branched; T2 as for T1, but with short appressed hairs basally; T3–T5 hairs moderately dense and short on disc, with sparse long hairs intermixed laterally and apically, subappressed medium length and white anterolaterally. S1 hairs long sparse along midline, absent elsewhere; S2–S5 hairs scattered long suberect, D-shaped glabrous area apicomedially; S6 hairs short subappressed. Surface Sculpture: Integument shiny lacking microsculpture unless stated otherwise. Face densely punctate i<d, with the exception being more sparse towards apex of supraclypeal area; vertexal area punctures sparser i=1–4d; impunctate around ocelli; genal area punctures small sparse i=1–3d;hypostomal area weakly imbricate except on disc, sparsely punctate. Mesoscutum very weakly imbricate, punctures distinct, varying in size, irregularly spaced i=0.5– 2.5d, densest laterally, sparsest on disc (obscured by pin posteriorly); mesoscutellum faintly imbricate, punctures scattered on disc, denser around margins i~1d; metanotum punctures dense i~1d. Metapostnotum dorsal surface margined by strong carina, indented posteromedially; areolate, median pair of areolae on either side of apically complete median carina take up most of the dorsal surface, margined by smaller elongate areolae. Preepisternum and hypoepimeral areas weakly rugose; mesepisternum punctate posteriorly punctures small, i<d; [metepisternum obscured by pubescence]; propodeum coarsely areolate, areolae on posterior surface large. Tegula impunctate weakly imbricate. T1–T2 very weakly imbricate laterally, impunctate; T3 punctures small dense i=0.5–3d; T4–T5 weakly imbricate, punctures small. S1 weakly imbricate, impunctate; S2–S5 imbricate, punctures shallow; S6 imbricate, more densely punctate than other sterna. Structure: Mandible shorter than compound eye (0.6 mm: 0.82 mm). Clypeus 3.5X broader than long (0.84 mm: 0.24 mm). Supraclypeal area convex, somewhat protuberant in profile. Frontal line carinate from just below lower tangent of antennal socket to ~1MOD below median ocellus (MOD = 0.12 mm). Inner margin of compound eyes somewhat convergent below: UOD:LOD 0.92 mm: 0.82 mm; ASD 0.1 mm, IAD 0.2 mm; supraclypeal area as long as wide (apical width 0.28 mm, length 0.28 mm); IOD:OOD 0.24 mm: 0.28 mm; vertex strongly convex in frontal view, upper tangent of compound eyes 0.25 MOD below lower tangent of median ocellus; genal area narrower than compound eye in profile (0.32 mm: 0.42 mm); F1 shorter than F2 (0.08mm: 0.12 mm). [Mesoscutum length to width ratio not measurable—surface distorted by pin.] Stigma large, 0.62 mm long, 0.18mm wide (~3.5:1); margin in marginal cell convex, marginal cell 1.04 mm long, 0.28mm wide, free portion slightly less than 3X that subtended by submarginal cells (0.82 mm: 0.3 mm); 1m-cu meets second submarginal cell near middle; stigmal perpendicular goes through 2r-m near anterior margin; hind wing with five distal hamuli. Pygidial plate apically rounded, surface slightly concave. Material Studied. Holotype female: FRENCH GUIANA, Les Eaux Claires, 3.5 mi. N[orth of] Saul, N3°38 - 40’ W53°13’ [~3.65 -53.21], 14-21 July 1995, mal[aise]. trap, A. Berkov, AMNH. Etymology: The species is known from a unique specimen and is named to honour the memory of Fernando Silveira who was also a unique individual, one of the warmest and funniest people the junior author has ever met; his passing is a great loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207